They do not nor will they ever try to divide the talent on the teams equally. If you did that then the black team would not be competitive with other clubs top teams.Further it would not be fair to the better players who get put on purple or white.If you think college coaches do not care what team you play on because "they recruit individuals not teams" you would be misguided in that they are more likely to show interest in you when your resume says black player.I hope the white team is better than most other clubs 3 team but stop with the barely less than the black team, its just not the case. Have your kid work hard and they will eventually get moved up if the deserve it.
I don't remember anyone saying they divide the talent equally among all 3 teams, but if they did, that's incorrect. However, a few people, who seem to be involved in white and purple teams, correctly pointed out that the talent between white and purple may be similar. After they fill the black team, with whoever they think are the BEST players, they'll attempt to field two competitive teams, with purple and white. They're looking for an A, and two B's, not A, B, and C.
No way is the talent equally divided among the three. But no way is it the top 24 players on black, then next best 24 on purple and so on. The black team could easily be made better by trading out bottom 1/3 with white and purple. That is the point, they have left a good amount of talent on the other teams which is great. If you think every player on black is better than all the kids on the other two teams you are clueless. Every team needs the players who will take a back seat to the top players come crunch time. Every team has those fill out players. Seriously ask the parents of the studs on the team if they think the bottom of the roster could be improved. Not trying to be mean here, but trying to enlight some disillusioned parents out there.
Reply
Quote
