Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
What if I told you this kid has a late July birthday is only 11, playing with and against kids who are older than he is; would that change your opinion? Just because a child is physically bigger than other kids on the field does not mean he's playing down. Some kids are just big.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
What if I told you this kid has a late July birthday is only 11, playing with and against kids who are older than he is; would that change your opinion? Just because a child is physically bigger than other kids on the field does not mean he's playing down. Some kids are just big.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
He's a great player, he just should be with kids that are also 12-13 and not 10 and 11. If Cabell cared about his development he would do the right thing.

It's a great team that goes to good without him, and there's nothing wrong with that. Not trying to single him out, as he likely has had nothing to do with these decisions.
What if I told you this kid has a late July birthday is only 11, playing with and against kids who are older than he is; would that change your opinion? Just because a child is physically bigger than other kids on the field does not mean he's playing down. Some kids are just big.


Late July and 11 is 2005. That's 2023. Not playing with kids his own age.
How's that? It's very, very common for parents to hold off on sending their child to kindergarten if they turn 5 a month prior to school starting. Very common. And at that time no parent knows how good their kid will be in any sport. Now, if they later chose to hold their child back, just to give them an edge on the field, then you would have a valid point. Its not as if he's 12 or 13 playing on a 5th grade team. He is playing with kids his age/grade. Just leave it at that and give the kid credit for working hard and being a great player. Don't criticize with no knowledge.