I agree that the owner would answer the question honestly when asked and probably does not let the fee influence his recommendation.
Two problems with the pay for advocacy option are 1) the false hope for people who have no business trying to play at the college level and 2) perception that those players have a leg up. Most of the self-advocacy information is available online and free now.
What is surprising right now is that given the success of the 2019 class, why aren't more 'elite players' staying with the club at the younger ages?
Because the people who disagree or hate Madlax are pushing hard and doing a good job of bashing/pointing out negatives about Madlax.
Or maybe a lot of families are not opting Madlax at the younger ages because they don't see it as the best option for them? Madlax 2020, for example, is nowhere near the best 2020 team in this area. Or maybe they like other clubs better.
Reply
Quote
