Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
If parents understand this concept for college, why isn't it true for HS?

So many parents send their kids to the same MIAA student/lax mills and wonder why their kid isn't playing.

Guess reality hasn't set in for them yet.
It takes getting to the college level to realize what 🐂💩the MIAA and everything pertaining to it really is. And I say that having two kids in MIAA.

Serious question - bull in what way? My experience traveling around the country is that for all its warts, the MIAA schools, down into upper MIAA-C, are SADLY a superior lacrosse product compared to 90% of what is offered nationally. Yes, a few HS in DC. Yes, IMG. Yes, DC/IAC. Yes, Long Island, Westchester, and MA are arguably better (at least some years). Sit with the parents from the best lax clubs in NC, GA, CO next time you're at a tournament. See them not even understand - even be shocked by - the physicality or complexity of the game that MIAA and IAC kids are playing with. .

Yea, but the MIAA kids are all graduating HS at the age of 20 while all the Long Island kids are graduating at 17/18 yrs old. So yea, the adults are going to play a lot more physical than the kids.

That is a laughable, typically LI response. "But all our kids nevvvverrr hold back and they all graduate when they're 17."

It’s true. LI makes students enroll in college when they turn 18 if they still want to attend school. Look it up.

So, I looked it up.

New York Education Law §3202 states that persons over 5 and under 21 years of age who have not received a high school diploma are entitled to attend the public schools ...

Nice troll effort though.....you got me to look it up.