Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour is clearly the more prestigious of the two. However - unless it can escape the politics that picked last years team it ain't worth the $$$.


Are the politics as bad in Baltimore for the UA?


Absolutely, Command division had majority FCA/CHC kids on squad. Guess who controlled selections?


I think there were as many, if not more Crabs players than FCA players on the Baltimore Command team. Stands to reason as they are the best club teams in Baltimore and two of the best teams in the country.


No, just the oldest. Leading the country in 19 and 20 year old HS Seniors. Nothing like trotting out kids that should be Sophomores in college to play 17 and 18 year olds. Oh right they're in HS now it doesn't matter. So if it doesn't matter, why not put and age qualifier on the UA games? Should be U-18.