Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Team USA u16 girls are all interchangeable. Really no difference in talent. The competition wasn’t that good but they all looked phenomenal out there.


Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Team USA u16 girls are all interchangeable. Really no difference in talent. The competition wasn’t that good but they all looked phenomenal out there.

14,17, 1 , 16 and 7 stood out for sure. The others dominated in mop up time. Not a great opportunity to evaluate though.

I agree with the first poster, if you mean “stood out” by not passing to wide open teammates and try to show off trick shots against weak competition I guess you are right. Making the team was way more impressive than what I saw. They would have been better off keeping the top 44 girls and making 2 teams and having them play each other. Then the ball hogs wouldn’t look so impressive.

it's a showcase. Let the girls have fun. It's all part of the game and these girls aren't the first nor will they be the last to play with extra flair. Did you watch the senior team USA over the summer? BTBs for days. insane skills. Anytime you play for team USA you want to showcase the game. No harm no foul.