Anyone attend Battle of the Bay; what teams looked good and what teams disappointed?
Dukes: looked good.better than the summer. Good collection of studs.
"Studs"? They come from weak minded families that need them to play down to succeed. In 2 years they will be barely noticeable.
Ha! What an absolute joke. PLEASE show me the kids who are "playing down". Outsiders looking at big athletic kids love to make excuses and throw stones. But you have no actual facts and so you hurl insults instead. It's honestly laughable.
The only thing laughable is the amount of koolaid your drinking.They have a nice team but they aren't so big when compared to boys the same age. And truthfully that's fine, but show me these studs in three years when those "big athletic kids" are still 5' 8" and just your run of the mill lacrosse players. These types of pluers were the mistakes college coaches are looking forward to not making now early recruiting is over. PS all the kids are friends so they know how old they are, it's not a big secret.
They actually ARE big when compared to boys the same age--that's what everyone is complaining about, right? How big they are? Well this one's going to hurt your theory--they're all 12 or 13. In fact all but 3 are age eligible for the WSYL (which seems to be THE measuring stick for a fair tournament all of a sudden) and the 3 who aren't miss it by literally weeks because they have August birthdays.
I wholly agree that if they stay 5'8" and ONLY depend on their size that wouldn't really work out well. But given that they're being taught how to be lacrosse players and utilize IQs I think they'll be okay.
