Clemson up 9-7 in the fourth. ND with the last five to win. So…..Clemson for real or ND not that good?
I was there. Clemson is good. They would have won if they had not got the 3 yellows in the 4th. They move the ball well and the goalie is very good. ND is ok, a .500 team at best in the ACC and a weak OOC schedule.
-- "I was there. Clemson is good. They would have won if they had not got the 3 yellows in the 4th."--
That statement reminds me of an old saying, something about the "if the Queen had you know what, she would be the King"....
So let me get this straight, you state that "Clemson is good" and then you state "ND is ok".... I assume that in your mind "ok" is better than "good".... We are all very happy that you were there but your post is absurd.
Considering the talent ND has the game should not have been close. For a 1st year team Clemson is good. they were up 9-7 in the 4th before the 1st of the 3 yellow cards. All 3 cards were legit calls so Clemson has to work on those situations. Clemson will be a better team than ND in 2 years. ND is the jeckyll and hide of the ACC.
Clemson May be a new program but they had 19 junior/senior/graduate transfers. They are not a typical new team like USF will be next year. They probsbly belong to be ranked top 25
Reply
Quote