Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous

Not true. The games were based on the brackets that each team played in and were set prior to the tournament. Crabs were already set to play whoever came out of the Hawks bracket. Presumably the theory being that Crabs would make it past the Hawks or whoever came out of that bracket but they knew it would not be Looneys, FCA or Laxachusetts.


Not true at all. Original bracket winners were seeded by record (all were 3-0), then goals against in 1 through 8 order. The 1-8 seedings were not tied into particular original bracket A-H, hence FCA, Crabs, Looney's, etc..


Nope crab daddy. As previous poster stated, brackets were published last week, crabs were slated to play whoever won the Hawks bracket.



Wrong. Brackets were based on record, then goals against. Keep trying.


OMG...typical delusional crab daddy nonsense. The bracket chart clearly showed how all of the brackets lined up e.g. A vs. E, B vs. F. It was out there for several days before the event, for everyone to see. Saying it was something different does not make it so.

My last comment on this topic since everyone who was actually paying attention knows how it was set up, or "a set up" depending on how you look at it.



Day 2 seeding was by record, then goals against. A was not predetermined to play E, and so on. That is very fake news. That is a lie. Seeded match ups were by ranking, not by day 1 bracket. FCA was seeded #1 because they had the fewest goals against. All bracket winners day 1 were 3-0. Crabs had 2nd fewest goals against, hence #2. Looney's had 3rd fewest goals against, hence #3. And so on..