Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what a fraud. even if you generously concede a 90. that's at best a 3.5. 1000 on SAT is not very strong. please don't insult the readers.


the college sports scene is as corrupt as everything else, UNC was cooking the books for athletes over an 18 year period before the scandal came to light and I'm sure it wasn't only them


and nothing is going to happen to them for it... a slap on the wrist at best.


Please explain to us, what should happen?

50% or more of the students who were given "A's" for taking fantom courses in African American Studies were not athletes. The university created the curriculum so that "STUDENTS" who were admitted to the university with sup par academic credentials could maintain a 2.0 GPA. Students were given "A's" in order to keep their GPS's up. Not all of the students were athletes. The vast majority of student athletes were football and mens basketball players.

Please ask the NCAA to let us all know how many men's and women's lacrosse players at UNC received "A's" in African American Studies during during that 18 year period.

You are a puts and a troll.



You're a little sensitive there Sally. No one said anything about womens lacrosse at UNC. The statement was "cooking the books for athletes" which clearly happened for a brief 18 years. The "program" should be penalized, but it won't. Other teams have seen post season bans, loss of scholarship, vacated wins etc... for much, much less. But I guess if they allowed the regular students to cheat too than it wasn't preferential treatment to the athletes....wild logic.

They may be a little sensitive but you are a little ignorant. The "program" was penalized, they did lose scholorships,they did have wins vacated, they did have a post season ban etc..The logic is that the NCAA should regulate athletics not school curriculum and academics and if the easy "A" classes were equally available to all students it is not an athletic issue but an accreditation issue which the NCAA has no jurisdiction over. Its actually a logical and legally interesting argument.