Can we stop comparing apples and oranges. Syracuse and UNC brought back numerous 5th year seniors, Grad students and Syracuse has 6th year player. Is it any wonder that they are playing at a higher level. The NCAA decision is what it is but it created the current environment which may continue for the near future.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Can we stop comparing apples and oranges. Syracuse and UNC brought back numerous 5th year seniors, Grad students and Syracuse has 6th year player. Is it any wonder that they are playing at a higher level. The NCAA decision is what it is but it created the current environment which may continue for the near future.
Did you even bother to look at ND roster or Loyola , stop with the whining .
Syracuse and UNC were noted as they are currently the 2 top teams and appear to be the most egregious in stacking their teams with transfers, Grad students. The same environment exists with other teams just didn’t feel the need to note every team. Bottom line is a number of teams have used the extra scholarship money to stack their teams. Would be nice to see the money these teams have dedicated to wlax so that a fair comparison can be made. ******Asterisk for this years Natty.
Your response just shows your ignorance . First UNC has one transfer player . Second every year some teams are fully funded while others are not . You sound like a whinny flaccid lost who hates most likely a UNC player . Stop being a flaccid chubby non athlete and have a conversation with the dad you so envy or shut up . The only asterisk should be on your birth certificate where it says most likely male .
Obvious your not a Mensa member. But educate us with your wlax knowledge. Does a team that is funding its program over the 12.5 scholarship cap by bringing back 5th year players, Grad transfers etc have an advantage. Oh yea see if your vocabulary goes deeper. And after your deep thinking response you can go home and get your shine box.
I am not the person that you are responding to but I will chime in. Why do you have a problem with 5th year players, grad transfers etc... and / or schools that are funding their program beyond the 12 scholarship limit for this year? The NCAA granted all 2020 spring sport athletes an additional year of eligibility nobody is doing anything wrong, everybody is playing by the same rules. Programs that are able to bring in the best players always have an advantage, do you think talent should somehow be divided up evenly among all programs? Do you think every program should have to offer the same amount of scholarships? Should all programs have the same operating budget? There are other schools that have 5th year players and graduate transfers , why do you only seem to be bothered by UNC and Syracuse? Again I ask, why do you have a problem with any of this?
Reply
Quote
