Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
3 former 2027 Hawks went to 2028, but they were 2028’s playing up. They are on age for 2028.

If you are born in summer 2009 before Sept you aren't on age for 2028. there's at least one if not more. If that's what fits best academically, fine do what's best, but don't pretend it's not a holdback impact when it comes to sports.

Please, not this again, Let the holdbacks pretend they are not holdbacks, they did prefirst or were born in the summer. That is not a holdback according to the world of lacrosse. Makes Johnny feel better. Get with the program.

What's worse 3-4 holdbacks on a team or creating all star teams to be able to compete.

Go Nationals

B
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
3 former 2027 Hawks went to 2028, but they were 2028’s playing up. They are on age for 2028.

If you are born in summer 2009 before Sept you aren't on age for 2028. there's at least one if not more. If that's what fits best academically, fine do what's best, but don't pretend it's not a holdback impact when it comes to sports.

Please, not this again, Let the holdbacks pretend they are not holdbacks, they did prefirst or were born in the summer. That is not a holdback according to the world of lacrosse. Makes Johnny feel better. Get with the program.

What's worse 3-4 holdbacks on a team or creating all star teams to be able to compete.

Lets see, what's worst....playing down or bringing in better on age players than you have ? Survey says, playing down .

What happens when little Johnny can't depend on his all stars he needs to shine. Its the exact same thing as a hold back. Both pathetic.