How about the fact that 2way and Leading Edge were head and shoulders above everyone else.
They both had better athletes and weapons all over the field.
Been sitting this in depth analysis out on the sidelines, but I have to draw the line with this genius I’m quoting. Are you serious? 2way and LE are saturated with kids 12-18 months older than any Long Island team. Period. End of story. And yes, it matters.
Ummmm ok. Last I checked this is a 2028 forum for westchester, Long Island, ct. facts are that 2Way and leading edge were much better. Not sure about the overly dramatic “everyone is 12–18 months older” statement either. Saw an awful lot of that 2Way roster at the World Series last summer.
Ummmm here are the facts. Both of those teams contain older players. Is it cheating? No Is it against the current rules for this age group? No If you took away those older players, would those teams be as good as they are? No If you took away those older players would they all of a sudden be bad teams? Absolutely not. Are they “head and shoulders” above 3D New England? No Are they “head and shoulders” above the Hawks? No Do you know why? Ummm yes you do
They are great teams regardless of the older players. But let’s not talk about how they are “head and shoulders” above everyone else without given the reason why. .
“Head and shoulders above” because they are 2years older!!! A head taller lmao
Reply
Quote