Re the BBL vs. ML game. Some of your facts are incorrect.
1.) The Richmond "mercenary" doesn't play attack and he's been on the team for years (also not from Richmond). He travels to practice regularly in spring and summer, but misses a lot in the fall because of football....like a sizeable portion of the team, unfortunately.
2.) ML was up at halftime over BBL by several goals. You got the complete coach meltdown and joy stick coaching correct. It cost us the game in OT. In fact, it never would have gone to OT if he just let them play. ML had the upper hand most of the game. Regardless, BBL is good team and deserved to win. They have improved a lot.
3.) Two kids left and went to BLC that played attack and attack/middie. They did indeed leave because the coach just decided out of the blue that his son was going to be starting attack. The attack/middie is better than said son and his parents simply had enough of it. However, it is a sore subject with the other attackmen who get less PT in the rotation because of the move and is/will be an ongoing issue.
okay, you have thoroughly confused me. Point 2 talks about an overtime game between BBL and MadLax, but tourney app says that was a 10-2 BBL win. This is a 2027 thread, right?
I really don't care about the MadLax drama, I just want to know whether BBL would have had better competition at the Circuit in PA or at a regular tournament in Delaware. It looks to me like they would have had only one worthwhile game at either event. I thought that is what this discussion was about??
