Originally Posted by Anonymous
Current recruiting environment favors those programs who recruit their tails off vs the lazy ones. Sure, it's easy to follow the crowd: primarily watch NLF teams, primarily talk to NLF club directors, look at IL rankings, and call it a day. But "fools gold" is at an all time high. Many NLF players who are hyped up rarely work out (and many obviously do). At the same time, there are many great players out there at non-NLF clubs without the hype and have incredible college careers at high level college programs.

More kids are playing lacrosse at a high level than ever before - and a lot of those kids don't play for NLF clubs (and many do). But IMO, the "70% of recruits from NLF Clubs" stat (factual or not) would have me drooling more than ever if I was one of the programs who has found success in the past from taking a broader approach to recruiting.


Drooling ? Lol....matt you're too much . Funny how your post on IG says "70% NLF and affiliates ".....so now even if a team isn't part of your NLF group but you invited them to an NLF tournament they are an " affiliate " and you include them in your statistics . You're dumber than I thought and that's pretty dense . Keep grinding matt ....too many people can see what you're up to with your watered down NLF then you now have to include " affiliates " loo