Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Serious question. In recruiting terms - Is it worth sending a kid to a top private school if he has an opportunity to go to a top public school? Looking at the colleges that a lot of the mid-tier private players go to there seems to be lot of overlap with the colleges that the top public players go to (eg W&L CNU RIT etc). So if you have a kid who could be elite public or midtier private what’s the advantage to private.

Each of the last few years of D1 commitments from DMV have only 5-10 kids from public schools vs 100+ from private schools. I think Broadneck and Severna Park may be the only schools with multiple D1 commits.

There are 2 main differences. Private school coaches spend way more with the athletes throughout the year both in official organized practices and tournaments and unofficial activities. Private schools have a much deeper player pool so competition at practices is going to be stronger. It would be really difficult for a kid at a public school to get the same level of training and opportunity to develop.

As far as getting recognized goes, a public school kid should make sure they are getting minutes on an elite club team. That should be enough to get on the recruiting radar and get seen.

Broadneck, Severna Park, Westminster, Catonsville, Urbana, Linganore to name a few always put out a lot of college players. These teams would be even better without losing a few kids to private schools each year.
Severna Park and Broadneck are regularly stacked, Westminster, Catonsville and Urbana and the others you mentioned have up and down years and play [Censored] schedules.

Look for any A Conference school, and he'll get recruited.