Why isn’t Machine listed as #1 in the latest US Club Rankings?
It's very simple ....because they're not #1. Not even close . Might not even crack the top 10.
Yea, but if the rankings were based off on age teams - Machine would be #1.
No one is impressed with the holdback teams.
Agreed on this. 91 would still be number 1 if age-based. The rankings are pointless. It is essentially a list of the teams with the oldest players.. The top three clubs are probably stacked with kids who could/should be in HS already
Whaaa...whaaa...whaaa. 91 cry babies at it again . A lot of would have , could have , should ofs....go win some games and be quiet . You do a lot of talking about holdbacks for a team that claims that they " play up " into 2026 brackets . How does that make any sense ?
