Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No. Loyola hired some True guy as a coach- Championship!

for freshman team

He's a decent coach and the kids seem to like him. His role at True since Day 1 has been mergers, acquisitions and recruiting though, so it's been rare to see him coaching. He's been in my orbit for several years and my first (and ongoing) inclination has been to keep him at arm's length because he's in a very transactional role at True....that's probably the nicest way I can put it.

Having him in a purely coaching role, trying to at least develop kids toward JV, may be a good call. May be a good thing for him, too. Back to the sport and what not.

Your transactional assessment is spot on.

Everyone knows how True operates and the level of his Baltimore teams.

From a lacrosse standpoint, do you think that's the level Loyola should aspire?

Just curious to hear from the Loyola faithful.

Adult discussion with no snark: It was briefly discussed at the LB parents' holiday party, 9th grade coaching is not on the radar for most. Most had no idea the hire had happened, and some didn't know the name. He won't be in front of recruits, and most of his players - Hereford HS, Harford Tech and Harford CC not too many players who would consider school at Loyola the best option for them (whether it's the academics or not wanting to sit on a 100 man, 3 team roster).

Let's face it, if a coach has a pedigree or a history of repeated/demonstrated success, if they take that 9th grade part time MIAA coaching gig, they are going to want to know what's the potential for upward career trajectory. In Loyola's current situation, everyone is holding their breath to see who the new AD brings on next, because it's likely that coach will hire assistants to implement their own system. In other words there's no upward trajectory for anyone on the current coaching staff. Hiring somebody like KT for one year, for a non varsity team, is a decent stop gap IMHO. There's about zero chance it becomes a long term gig for him, but it's good for his resume' and who knows, maybe they win some games and maybe he convinces a few lower tier LB lax kids to go play for True in the summers. Harm done = zero.

The harm is that beyond his transactional position at True, his coaching pedigree comes from less than mediocre programs/divisions. Does he even know how to coach superior players beyond the basic drills that they do at True? This is another indication that LB has no plan to develop its underclassmen who aspire to play varsity or beyond. If your kid is a middle schooler who plays on one of the elite B'more teams, does the opportunity to be coached by KT make you want to come to LB?

Response.......Yeah I know his pedigree if you can call it that. And I doubt he has experience coaching superior players above the middle school age. That said, "superior" 9th grade and 10th grade players are most likely going to make JV (9th) or varsity (10th) at LB, not be stuck on the 9th-10th grade team which is mostly your HoCo AAA kids, Team 91, FCA, Predators, etc.

You raise a good point about actual development. That's why I'm guessing the school and KT both understand this is a short term thing. I personally like the coaching staff at LB, but to close out the MIAA season the way they did, with a new alumnus athletic director looking over their shoulder, has the lax staff a little icey these days. Kind of like the football coach calling a run play with time expiring, against Calvert Hall, with the new AD standing on the sideline with his LB football letter jacket on. Doneskies.