Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You could have the best kids, but maybe not a ton of success without the right coaching and offenses/defenses, etc. You could also have lesser kids and better coaching and have a lot of success. If any team at this level is having issues, the whole picture needs to be looked at. I have to think that teams like Hawks and NL have good enough players AND know how to coach them. That’s what separates the top from the bottom.
Having too many kids on a roster will ruin a team. If you have over 20 players start a B team. Keeps the talent level relative.

NL was not a great team last year, let’s not forget…

Folks, this love affair with NL may be a little premature. They pulled one out against Madlax down 4-2 with 4 minutes remaining, and had Hawks on the ropes. It’s early Spring. Eeeeeasy….

Also, holding Madlax to 4 goals is not much of a feat. Hawks held them to 5. And Madlax couldn't even put up double digits against True.
Love this. Counting out Madlax after two games. Tight ones at that.

Earlier Madlax Dad said they "steamrolled" the Hawks last summer 7-2, but the recent 9-5 Hawks win over the Madlax was "tight." Just stop posting on here. It's embarrassing the way you talk about 6th grade lacrosse.