Originally Posted by Anonymous
1. Hawks - They will repeat. Deepest roster, stacked at the positions. Top goalie, attack and FO in Elite.
2. Madlax - detest to say well coached, but they have a system that wins youth games, and a double hold back.
3. FCA - Stud Attack and FO. Good depth, but not enough overall talent to beat 1 and 2
4. Next Level - Great parts, solid depth, undisciplined and easy to predict
5. Crabs - They seem to be middle of the road every year and at every tourney
6. True Annapolis - Lost some kids. Took a step back this year.
7. BLC - Got better, but not good enough to compete at Elite. Could win 1 or 2 games, could win 0.
8. Kelly Post - welcome to a miserable year.

This is pretty good analysis. I’d say it’s more that there is a tier 1 that consists of Madlax and Hawks — and maybe Hawks are slightly favored. I think the battle at the x will be especially key between those two.

Then there is a second tier that consists of FCA, Next Level, and Crabs. FCA seems to be the best bet of those three, but I wouldn’t be shocked if it was NL or Crabs in third.

Then there is a third tier of True Annapolis, BLC, and KP. BLC has gotten better and True Annapolis is probably not as strong as last year so that will probably be a pretty interesting game. I think KP is a small step behind these two, but wouldn’t be surprised if they beat either True or BLC or both.

Should be a fairly competitive league overall except when the Tier 1 teams play tier 3. Those could be very one sided.