Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Loyola has 100+ kids in their lax program.

A few of those kids play B-level football and the team implodes?

๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐Ÿ˜„ ๐Ÿ˜‚

+1
Not the best showing for our boys. We were only missing a few guys. We should have done better but the scheme wasn't really tailored to the boys on hand. And we missed too many open shots. We made the goalies look better than they were.
We have more talent than most. We'll be back and at the top of the conference this spring. Bank on it. RDR

So what does your statement mean "the scheme wasn't really tailored to the boys on hand".:. Who was the scheme tailored to if not the boys "on hand", assuming you are talking about the ones that were there.. I saw Loyola's last game of the day, they did not look bad, had a few standout players, a middie and a lefty attack. The problem with Loyola is they lack MIAA level coaching, the head coach and others have no idea how to change a game plan according to how the game is progressing, the last game against BL last spring clearly showed and proved the coaching staff weak. Loyola has talent but without strong coaching, who knows how spring 2022 will play out.[/quote]

Who comes up with the team's scheme, what the kids run, or how they are prepared?

We agree.

I was just trying to be positive and nice.