Forums20
Topics3,800
Posts399,217
Members2,637
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I think Team 11 beats NXT at this point.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
Ok, thanks Tad
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
seems like just too many teams in Philly area.theres also Bandits, Brotherly Love, Dukes Twist, Headstrong, Black Bear, 302, Bucks Select, East Coast Power (new), Olde English and on and on and on
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Dukes and Mesa both are B teams, but thanks for your 2 cents Tad
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
Ok, thanks Tad I'm nott Tad but this looks pretty accurate (maybe Team 11 should be above NXT), for a variety of reasons Dukes, Mesa, and HHH are really struggling at this age group
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
Ok, thanks Tad I'm nott Tad but this looks pretty accurate (maybe Team 11 should be above NXT), for a variety of reasons Dukes, Mesa, and HHH are really struggling at this age group Dude, your response make zero sense! You say it looks accurate and then say Dukes, Mesa and HHH struggle st the age. Did you look at the rankings?
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Philly 2020 Teams Ranked (IMO): 1. Rising Sons 2. Dukes 3. Mesa 4. Freedom 5. HHH 6. PA Roughriders 7. NXT 8. Team 11
Ok, thanks Tad I'm nott Tad but this looks pretty accurate (maybe Team 11 should be above NXT), for a variety of reasons Dukes, Mesa, and HHH are really struggling at this age group Dude, your response make zero sense! You say it looks accurate and then say Dukes, Mesa and HHH struggle st the age. Did you look at the rankings? Heres how I rankPhilly 2020 teams: 1. R Sons 2. Freedom 3. Dukes 4. PA RR 5. Mesa 6. HHH 7. Team 11 8. NXT
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So with the new 60 second shot clock, I would be rethinking having a midfielder who doesn’t go both ways. I think we will see the end of “D mid” and “O mid”
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So with the new 60 second shot clock, I would be rethinking having a midfielder who doesn’t go both ways. I think we will see the end of “D mid” and “O mid” Really.....please explain.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quaker:
HHH 3-0 Rising Sons 2-0-1 Mesa 1-1-1
Rising Sons tied Blue Star. Mesa lost to Blue Star. HHH beat Blue Star 12-5.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quaker:
HHH 3-0 Rising Sons 2-0-1 Mesa 1-1-1
Rising Sons tied Blue Star. Mesa lost to Blue Star. HHH beat Blue Star 12-5. Results today are not significant when determining the better team. Sons are hands down the best team in philly. If you think otherwise you are ignoring the obvious.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So with the new 60 second shot clock, I would be rethinking having a midfielder who doesn’t go both ways. I think we will see the end of “D mid” and “O mid” they do it in the MML all the time . That will not happen.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quaker:
HHH 3-0 Rising Sons 2-0-1 Mesa 1-1-1
Rising Sons tied Blue Star. Mesa lost to Blue Star. HHH beat Blue Star 12-5. The rankings on this thread are a joke.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quaker:
HHH 3-0 Rising Sons 2-0-1 Mesa 1-1-1
Rising Sons tied Blue Star. Mesa lost to Blue Star. HHH beat Blue Star 12-5. The rankings on this thread are a joke. Rising Sons has jumped the shark!
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You people are so notIntelligent talking about the scores, only thing you should be worried about is how many college coaches were watching the game. and how did your kid play.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You people are so notIntelligent talking about the scores, only thing you should be worried about is how many college coaches were watching the game. and how did your kid play. 0.0
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
You people are so notIntelligent talking about the scores, only thing you should be worried about is how many college coaches were watching the game. and how did your kid play. Tad, the best teams play for each other and not with each other. Lacrosse is a team sport.
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quaker:
HHH 3-0 Rising Sons 2-0-1 Mesa 1-1-1
Rising Sons tied Blue Star. Mesa lost to Blue Star. HHH beat Blue Star 12-5. Look what else happened at Quaker: Sons beat Turtles 11-1. PA RoughR beat Turtles 9-3. HHH beat Turtles 8-5
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
conclusion, Turtles blow. Both on LI and in PA...
|
|
|
Re: Boys 2020
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Turtles pretty solid on li
|
|
|
Moderated by A1Laxer, Annoy., baldbear, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, botc_ne, clax422, CP@BOTC, cp_botc, David20, Gremelin, hatimd80, JimSection1, Ladylaxer2609, Laxers412, LaxMomma, Liam Kassl, LILax15, MomOf6, Team BOTC, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, Thirdy@BOTC, TM@BOTC
|
|