Home
Posted By: B_O_T_C Girls High School - 08/08/16 10:10 PM
It's the start of the Fall 2016/Spring 2017 season. Use this thread for your posts regarding this age group
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/01/16 09:36 PM
Is NCS going to be respectable this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/02/16 04:30 PM
what is NCS? McDonogh will dominate again. IAAM should be competitive from 2nd thru 10. Interested to see how Glenelg Country does moving up to A conference from B conference.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/02/16 08:03 PM
look out for manchester valley . north carroll closed so they got the best of both schools. should be a powerhouse. mcdonogh will go down this year by someone but then again everyone says that after 150 straight wins.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/20/16 05:20 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
what is NCS? McDonogh will dominate again. IAAM should be competitive from 2nd thru 10. Interested to see how Glenelg Country does moving up to A conference from B conference.


Glenelg Country has a 2020 commit, to Penn State.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/20/16 06:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
look out for manchester valley . north carroll closed so they got the best of both schools. should be a powerhouse. mcdonogh will go down this year by someone but then again everyone says that after 150 straight wins.....
Yes! Manchester Valley will be strong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/20/16 10:34 PM
Glenelg scrimmages McD so a win won't mean squat but it will be a good game nonetheless
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/21/16 02:43 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
look out for manchester valley . north carroll closed so they got the best of both schools. should be a powerhouse. mcdonogh will go down this year by someone but then again everyone says that after 150 straight wins.....
Century usually gives McD some headaches as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/21/16 02:57 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Glenelg scrimmages McD so a win won't mean squat but it will be a good game nonetheless
If you say so. Keep an eye on SPSG and Century will be in it to win it as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/22/17 12:18 PM
great game yesterday at McDonogh, vs Garrison Forest School. McDonogh pulled out a real close game 13-11. at one point the game was 10-9, and Garrison scored, but the goal was called back for shooting space foul. McDonogh ended up stopping the ensuing shot and scored on a fastbreak. McDonogh then went to a stall ball approach to kill the clock.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/22/17 09:02 PM
Notre Dame Prep had an impressive win... BC Commit with a great game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/23/17 06:45 PM
Looking forward to seeing how Mount de Sales does against McD this Saturday. The new coach looks like he has the team firing on all cylinders and they can really show their growth and development under him. I’m really looking forward to the draw middies’ matchup – that’s going to be back and forth all game. And with the experienced senior leadership on defense this year – they will definitely show their metal.

This will be a good barometer for Mount de Sales to see how well this season will progress.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/17 03:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looking forward to seeing how Mount de Sales does against McD this Saturday. The new coach looks like he has the team firing on all cylinders and they can really show their growth and development under him. I’m really looking forward to the draw middies’ matchup – that’s going to be back and forth all game. And with the experienced senior leadership on defense this year – they will definitely show their metal.

This will be a good barometer for Mount de Sales to see how well this season will progress.
Do not see a competitive game here.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/17 07:59 PM
I have to disagree. MDSA is on an upward trajectory. The new coaches are breathing new life into this program. It is really starting to gel. The D is tough as nails and there are some middies that can really move the ball in transitions. There are sniper feeders on attack with tall girls that can finish. This is going to be closer than everyone thinks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/17 11:18 PM
Is McD does not win by at least 10, consider it a major victory for MDSA. The athletes at the 2 schools are in completely different leagues, and new coach is not in Chris Robinson's league..fact
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/25/17 01:18 AM
The new MDSA coach is no comparison to MG. she is one of the best coaches out there. Mcd will win by at least 12 tomorrow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/25/17 04:49 AM
Did MG ever have a winning season with MDSA??
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/25/17 02:34 PM
MCD 21 MDSA 6

MCD was up by 12 at the half and 15 with 10 minutes left.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/27/17 07:23 PM
So McDonough only scored 5 goals in the second half? That don't sound right.

Did I hear correctly that Brendan Mundorf is one of the coaches at DeSales?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/27/17 09:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So McDonough only scored 5 goals in the second half? That don't sound right.

Did I hear correctly that Brendan Mundorf is one of the coaches at DeSales?


You did not hear correctly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/27/17 11:55 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So McDonough only scored 5 goals in the second half? That don't sound right.

Did I hear correctly that Brendan Mundorf is one of the coaches at DeSales?


You did not hear correctly.


Matthew Mundorf is a coach at MDSA, not Brendan.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/09/17 12:16 PM
DeSales is coming together as a team - they just had two close losses. The girls could finally be buying into the new system. It probably will not be long until they get over the hump and start firing on all cylinders. It would not surprise me if that happens during the next game or two. They could end up surprising some people.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/10/17 04:02 PM
Yet DeSales drops one to a B conference team Severn, yea "really coming together as a team"
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/10/17 04:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yet DeSales drops one to a B conference team Severn, yea "really coming together as a team"


Severn is in the A conference for girls lacrosse. They are B for field hockey.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/10/17 05:49 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yet DeSales drops one to a B conference team Severn, yea "really coming together as a team"

Severn is an A conference team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/10/17 07:04 PM
Better add wm in the running. Knocked off mc today
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/27/17 09:14 AM
Hi all. I'm new to this, specifically to the public high schools playoffs. How are the playoff matchups and schedules set up? I noticed that we only have about a week left in the regular/county season. Someone had mentioned something about a regional format.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/27/17 04:53 PM
Big Game today: NDP vs MCD.

Who does everyone have?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/09/17 02:38 PM
The MPSSAA lacrosse brackets are out. Some of these sections are ridiculous. How can they talk about travel distance when Manchester Valley is in the South Region?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/10/17 01:45 AM
Glenelg walks through the states in MD
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/10/17 12:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Glenelg walks through the states in MD


If they make it out of their region - the rest should be a stroll.

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/17 02:14 PM
The first round of the MPSSAA playoffs are done. Did anyone hear of any "bracket busters"? Or surprises?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/23/17 11:41 PM
Now that the high school season has almost come to an end, I would like to throw out an option for those senior players that still haven't found a college lacrosse home yet. My daughter plays for Anne Arundel Community College and they had a very good season this year, making it to the national semi-finals. AACC is just a couple of good players away from getting back to the national tournament next season and I know there are quite a few good players in the Annapolis/Baltimore area who are wanting to continue to play college lacrosse while getting a great education at the same time, at a nice low price. AACC has a long history of players who have moved on to 4 year schools, too. Also, AACC's women's lacrosse team is D1 in the NJCAA and has the option of giving an athletic scholarship. Let me say again, I am a parent and am not affiliated with the school or team, officially. But, I do know they are good and can get better with a couple of good players. We all know that there's always the player who changes her mind in the fall or doesn't go back to the college after winter break, wants to stay local or the family has financial limits. AACC is looking for you too. If interested in staying local and playing, getting a great education and spending less money for it is something you may be interested, please go to the AACC Athletics webpage and send the coach a message via the recruit questionnaire.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/23/18 04:19 AM
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/23/18 12:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Archbishop Spalding will be improved this year. Will they be able to beat McDonough? Probably not, but the scores will be much closer than in the past.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/23/18 03:08 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/24/18 11:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 12:53 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


It was so unnecessary to bring that to this forum. There was no need to go into detail.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 04:11 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


It was so unnecessary to bring that to this forum. There was no need to go into detail.

Yes, it was so well covered up until now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 04:41 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


It was so unnecessary to bring that to this forum. There was no need to go into detail.

Yes, it was so well covered up until now.

Does he any any ties to this?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 05:06 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


It was so unnecessary to bring that to this forum. There was no need to go into detail.

Yes, it was so well covered up until now.


Ok I agree we should "bottle" up this conversation not fuel the rumors "running" around.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 05:54 PM
Are any of the private school rosters out yet?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 05:54 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


It was so unnecessary to bring that to this forum. There was no need to go into detail.

Yes, it was so well covered up until now.

Does he any any ties to this?

No. This was an unrelated incident.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/18 07:16 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
With private school tryouts wrapping up, will anyone knock off McD this year? Will the coaching change have an impact?


Yes



McDonogh not be the same. Nancy Love is the interim coach and the Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding at McDonogh. Earlier this year several McDonogh student/athletes were expelled for rape and sexual assaults inside the McDonogh dorms. I'm surpised she still retained her job.


That cant be true. Nothing was ever in paper about that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/26/18 02:16 AM
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/27/18 03:01 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/27/18 12:42 PM
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/ma...ssault-investigation-20180126-story.html
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/27/18 02:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


It was in the paper. The school does a very good job of keeping things quiet though. The parent having sex with a student was kept quiet much longer than you would think a couple years ago as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/27/18 07:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


It was in the paper. The school does a very good job of keeping things quiet though. The parent having sex with a student was kept quiet much longer than you would think a couple years ago as well.


Big deal.. a couple of students actually had a fight! The horror! Far cry from rape, assault, etc..


""""“It’s closed at this point. We’ve completed our investigation and have been unable to substantiate any of the allegations,” said spokesman Cpl. Shawn Vinson.""""

"""Investigators conducted several interviews about an alleged assault last month but were unable to get enough to conduct a criminal investigation. He said the case could be reopened if more information or evidence was found. Vinson described the allegations only as an assault between male students.""""
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/27/18 07:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


It was in the paper. The school does a very good job of keeping things quiet though. The parent having sex with a student was kept quiet much longer than you would think a couple years ago as well.


Big deal.. a couple of students actually had a fight! The horror! Far cry from rape, assault, etc..


""""“It’s closed at this point. We’ve completed our investigation and have been unable to substantiate any of the allegations,” said spokesman Cpl. Shawn Vinson.""""

"""Investigators conducted several interviews about an alleged assault last month but were unable to get enough to conduct a criminal investigation. He said the case could be reopened if more information or evidence was found. Vinson described the allegations only as an assault between male students.""""


Ok Biff
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/18 01:42 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


It was in the paper. The school does a very good job of keeping things quiet though. The parent having sex with a student was kept quiet much longer than you would think a couple years ago as well.


Big deal.. a couple of students actually had a fight! The horror! Far cry from rape, assault, etc..


""""“It’s closed at this point. We’ve completed our investigation and have been unable to substantiate any of the allegations,” said spokesman Cpl. Shawn Vinson.""""

"""Investigators conducted several interviews about an alleged assault last month but were unable to get enough to conduct a criminal investigation. He said the case could be reopened if more information or evidence was found. Vinson described the allegations only as an assault between male students.""""


Ok Biff


That was a quote from Police?? What does biff and your BS have to do with it
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/18 02:57 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


It was in the paper. The school does a very good job of keeping things quiet though. The parent having sex with a student was kept quiet much longer than you would think a couple years ago as well.


Big deal.. a couple of students actually had a fight! The horror! Far cry from rape, assault, etc..


""""“It’s closed at this point. We’ve completed our investigation and have been unable to substantiate any of the allegations,” said spokesman Cpl. Shawn Vinson.""""

"""Investigators conducted several interviews about an alleged assault last month but were unable to get enough to conduct a criminal investigation. He said the case could be reopened if more information or evidence was found. Vinson described the allegations only as an assault between male students.""""


Ok Biff


That was a quote from Police?? What does biff and your BS have to do with it


Because it wasn’t a fight between a couple students. Not even close. If that’s all it was the consequences wouldn’t have been what they were.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/18 11:47 AM
That’s how they fight in prison!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/18 06:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
A lot of things happen at McDonogh that don’t reach the papers....


If Police are involved ..it will be public. I call BS on this too. Easy to say anything.


The police are involved.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/01/18 01:47 PM
The new McDonogh coach is the Director of Boarding at the school. Curious how she still has a job after what went down there. Just expelling the kids involved is not sufficient. Some adult should be held accountable for what went on. I am sure the school will be sued by the parents of the Freshman boys involved.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/18 02:54 AM
Who will beat McDonogh this year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/18 05:32 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who will beat McDonogh this year?


3 schools will.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/18 08:51 PM
Do the schools publish rosters? I keep looking at Madlax. Not sure how that website works though...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/18 09:27 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do the schools publish rosters? I keep looking at Madlax. Not sure how that website works though...


Wrong forum
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/18 09:51 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Do the schools publish rosters? I keep looking at Madlax. Not sure how that website works though...


Madlax? Why are you looking at a boy's club website for girl's high school team rosters?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/07/18 12:28 AM
Are you thinking of MaxPreps?
I do think it is important to see who made certain teams especially in the private schools. It’s interesting to see who moved onto what schools
from the club lacrosse days.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/07/18 04:01 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Are you thinking of MaxPreps?
I do think it is important to see who made certain teams especially in the private schools. It’s interesting to see who moved onto what schools
from the club lacrosse days.


Interesting yes. Not sure it’s important.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/07/18 09:06 PM
It’s important to keep it interesting!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/18 11:45 PM
What's up with a kid who's been on topguns black (2020) since 5th grade now being on her 3rd year of JV at wantagh. Who got it wrong?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/12/18 12:38 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's up with a kid who's been on topguns black (2020) since 5th grade now being on her 3rd year of JV at wantagh. Who got it wrong?


You realize this is the MD forum and none of us know who you are talking about? We all think top guns stinks anyway so it’s not surprising.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/12/18 10:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's up with a kid who's been on topguns black (2020) since 5th grade now being on her 3rd year of JV at wantagh. Who got it wrong?

Since you are clearly very concerned about this, maybe you should speak with her parents to get the answers you need. I’m sure they would love to discuss this with you. If it doesn’t affect you why do you care what level she is playing on? Seriously, you must have something better than this to worry about. Also, if your intention was for all of LI to see this you probably shouldn’t post it on the MD forum. U2twz
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/13/18 08:55 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's up with a kid who's been on topguns black (2020) since 5th grade now being on her 3rd year of JV at wantagh. Who got it wrong?


TG black lost most of the good players 3-4 years ago, whoever is left on the team is there for a reason - no other options
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/13/18 09:33 PM
That’s funny!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/14/18 09:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What's up with a kid who's been on topguns black (2020) since 5th grade now being on her 3rd year of JV at wantagh. Who got it wrong?


TG black lost most of the good players 3-4 years ago, whoever is left on the team is there for a reason - no other options


Hey....I know you....you are the troll. Whatcha doing in MD. Gone ghetto I guess.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/18 10:33 AM
Big congrats to Glenelg Country and Maryvale for pulling off big upsets this week!!! Exciting stuff early in the IAAM A conference early in the season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/18 03:31 PM
The natives are restless at Mcdonogh
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/18 06:42 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The natives are restless at Mcdonogh


Kind of a random posting about a team that is still undefeated. Care to elaborate?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/18 06:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The natives are restless at Mcdonogh


We’ll do tell and leave nothing out
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/18 09:34 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The natives are restless at Mcdonogh


So you're gonna drop this little nugget and then disappear?
Posted By: Guenthner Re: Girls High School - 05/18/18 06:10 PM
Congratulations to NDP and Mac Ford
Posted By: MrAnonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/19/18 07:32 PM
Originally Posted by Guenthner
Congratulations to NDP and Mac Ford


Nice of you to register and post that a week after the game.lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/18 09:50 PM
Taylor Cummings has been named the new McDonogh varsity lacrosse coach.




We would like to take this opportunity to thank Nancy Love for stepping in as the interim Head Coach of the girls varsity lacrosse team for the 2018 season. Nancy went above and beyond the call of duty and did an outstanding job along with her assistants, Taylor Cummings '12, Mary Beth Todd '02, and Eva Winiarski. We will be forever grateful to Nancy for her time, expertise, and love for the team. We know the girls will always remember how she made them feel—valued, important, and proud to be a part of a special legacy.



After 14 years of complete dedication to the team, Nancy has decided it is time to step away from her role as a varsity coach. Although, she is quick to add that she will always be there to support the girls and the coaches off the field in any way that would be helpful. Nancy will continue her administrative responsibilities as Associate Head of Upper School and Director of Boarding.



As we look to the 2019 season, we are happy to announce that Taylor Cummings will be the new Girls Varsity Lacrosse Head Coach. She will also teach physical education classes beginning this fall. Taylor was a Golden Eagle during her high school years at McDonogh, playing varsity soccer, basketball, and lacrosse. She was also The Baltimore Sun's Athlete of the Year in 2011 and 2012. Taylor went on to the University of Maryland where she led the Terps to two NCAA tournament titles and was the first-ever three-time winner of the Tewaaraton Award, which is presented annually to the most outstanding American college lacrosse player. Since graduating from Maryland, Taylor has focused her attention on growing the game of lacrosse and hosting clinics and camps. She is also Regional Director for WPLL Futures, a national program for high school girls that focuses on lacrosse, character, and leadership.



Mary Beth Todd and Eva Winiarski will continue to be assistant coaches. Mary Beth, who was a standout soccer, basketball, and lacrosse player at McDonogh and played soccer at the University of Delaware, is Head of our Physical Education Department, a dorm parent, and a member of McDonogh's Athletic Hall of Fame. Eva, who played lacrosse at Drexel University and was captain of the 2017 team, teaches Middle School language arts and coaches Middle School field hockey and basketball.



Please join us in thanking Nancy for everything she has done for the girls lacrosse program over the years and welcoming Taylor back to the Nest in her new role as Head Coach! We are confident that Taylor's knowledge of the game, as well as her passion, work ethic, and boundless energy, will have a positive impact on the girls and the program in the years to come.



-------------------------------------------------------



I hope you are having a fantastic ending to the 2018 school year and are enjoying all of the festivities that come along with it. I've met some of you through assisting with this year's varsity program and others from various camps and clinics, but I wanted to take a moment to personally introduce myself to the McDonogh girls lacrosse community as a whole.



For those of you I haven't met, my name is Taylor Cummings, and I am excited to be the new Head Coach of the Girls Varsity Lacrosse program. I graduated from McDonogh in 2012 and went on to play at the University of Maryland for the next four years. After graduating in 2016, I started my own company that provides lacrosse training through camps and clinics across the country. I also play for the U.S. Women's National Team.



My most recent job, however, is one of my very favorite experiences. This spring, I had the incredible honor of working with McDonogh's varsity program under my former coach and incredible mentor, Nancy Love, and alongside two other amazing coaches and people, Mary Beth Todd '02 and Eva Winiarski. Along with our group of unbelievably talented young women, we had an incredibly successful season.



As you can probably tell, lacrosse has most certainly become my life. It has not only kept me healthy and fulfilled my competitive drive, but it has been the vehicle through which I have learned some of life's challenging lessons. I've had my share of successes and failures on and off the field, and I have been able to navigate all of them because of everything I've learned through this sport. More so, over my years of playing and coaching, I've had incredible opportunities to form relationships, friendships, and memories that will last a lifetime.



Mary Beth, Eva, and I are tremendously invested in providing these same opportunities and helping players become successful young women at McDonogh and beyond. We are committed to using lacrosse to help student-athletes learn life lessons, build character, and develop invaluable and intangible skills they will use throughout their lives. In addition, we want every player to have fun and grow as a person and player each and every day.



This philosophy is not only relevant to the varsity program but to every level and age group within the McDonogh community. I want you to know that the coaching staff and players are looking forward to sharing our love of the sport with girls of all ages (PK-12) through on-field instruction and meaningful off-field interaction.



I am so honored, humbled, and immensely thankful for this incredible opportunity, and I cannot wait to get started. If you have any questions or would like to meet with me in person, please feel free to reach out. The more we can all get to know one another, the better our program will be as a whole. Thank you for your time. GO EAGLES!!



Sincerely,



Taylor Cummings '12
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 05/25/18 05:49 PM
From McDonough to Florida: https://www.floridalacrossenews.com...robinson-as-head-coach-of-girls-program/
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/04/18 06:54 PM
More money to make!!! only job is to coach girls lax. Probably has unlimited use of the facilities. Will probably start up an NGLL South league, start a club M&D South. setup tourneys in Florida. roll in cash!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/07/18 08:44 PM
https://events.r2it.com/lacrosse/UnderArmour/Roster/Division/Underclass
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/08/18 01:55 AM
Does anyone know how the “uncommitted” roster works? Would those selected already know?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/08/18 02:14 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does anyone know how the “uncommitted” roster works? Would those selected already know?


according to UALax website:

UNCOMMITTED SHOWCASE

Each year there are very talented players who are on the cusp of making the regional Underclass teams, but are not selected. Aside from the 22 players chosen for each team, four uncommitted (to college) players from each of the graduating classes will be invited to compete and showcase themselves in front of scores of coaches at Towson University on Under Armour All-America Weekend.

A total of 48 players in each of the graduating classes – 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 – for both boys and girls will be invited to participate event weekend. Players will be selected by the regional evaluators and coaches after the final regional teams are picked. Teams will be divided accordingly.

*You must have participated in the regional tryouts to be eligible for the Underclass Showcase.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/07/19 07:53 PM
I'm not sure if everyone is aware, but there is currently a NCAA proposal to change the recruiting calendar to allow contact starting 6/15 after 10th grade and visits and offers to begin 8/1. This would change the current date of 9/1 of junior year for all contact. This proposal has been recommended by the NCAA Student-Athlete Experience Committee for all sports but Football, Basketball, Baseball and Hockey. This proposal was approved for a final vote in April by the NCAA Council. This week the ACC has submitted a request to amend this proposal to keep the 9/1 date for lacrosse. This will now also be voted on in April. I'm not sure if most of you agree, but the current 9/1 date has several issues. First off, we are all forced to blindly spend money for our kids to attend camps, clinics, etc. While we can hear if a school has "general interest" some schools don't even offer that much. Allowing contact on 6/15 would make it possible to have real discussions with the coaches to gauge their actual level of interest, where the player is on their list and other useful information. It also provides an opportunity to being to create a relationship with the coaches that will be coaching your child for 4 years. As you all are aware, the 9/1 date does not remove the recruiting pressure on the kids. Coaches still watch the games years prior to that date. If anything the pressure is worse because the kids have no idea where they stand. Moving the visit date to 8/1 also allows the kids to more easily play fall sports. Most soccer, field hockey, football coaches aren't going to be too thrilled with kids missing Friday and weekend practices or even games because they need to go visit colleges for lacrosse. Coaches say they want multiple sport athletes yet pass rules that make it very difficult to play a fall sport junior year.

It has been expressed to me that it would be very beneficial for as many parents as possible to send letters/emails to the chair of the NCAA council prior to the April vote expressing concerns with the 9/1 date and support for the new proposal which is Proposal 2018-93. I am including the email below for the current and incoming Chairs. I hope we as a community can come together and try to make sure this positive change can pass.

Current Chair:
Blake James bjames@miami.edu
Incoming Chair:
Dr. M. Grace Calhoun athdir@pobox.upenn.edu
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/19 06:20 PM
What does the IAAM looking like this year? McDonogh graduated a ton, but have a ton coming back. Interesting to see how Taylor does in her first year as coach. NDP graduated a ton, but not sure what they have left, They practically dress half the school on the sideline. Spalding or Glenelg Country have a shot? Bryn Mawr and Roland Park?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/19 06:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What does the IAAM looking like this year? McDonogh graduated a ton, but have a ton coming back. Interesting to see how Taylor does in her first year as coach. NDP graduated a ton, but not sure what they have left, They practically dress half the school on the sideline. Spalding or Glenelg Country have a shot? Bryn Mawr and Roland Park?

Top 4
1. NDP
2. McD
3. SPSG
4. GCS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/19 08:16 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What does the IAAM looking like this year? McDonogh graduated a ton, but have a ton coming back. Interesting to see how Taylor does in her first year as coach. NDP graduated a ton, but not sure what they have left, They practically dress half the school on the sideline. Spalding or Glenelg Country have a shot? Bryn Mawr and Roland Park?

Top 4
1. NDP
2. McD
3. SPSG
4. GCS


I’d put GCS as the top seed going in and probably MCD as two. Don’t believe the the bs SPSG would not do any better then last year they’ll finish mid pack again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/19 08:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What does the IAAM looking like this year? McDonogh graduated a ton, but have a ton coming back. Interesting to see how Taylor does in her first year as coach. NDP graduated a ton, but not sure what they have left, They practically dress half the school on the sideline. Spalding or Glenelg Country have a shot? Bryn Mawr and Roland Park?

Top 4
1. NDP
2. McD
3. SPSG
4. GCS


I’d put GCS as the top seed going in and probably MCD as two. Don’t believe the the bs SPSG would not do any better then last year they’ll finish mid pack again.



NDP wins the next two. They could field two competitive teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/19 09:06 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What does the IAAM looking like this year? McDonogh graduated a ton, but have a ton coming back. Interesting to see how Taylor does in her first year as coach. NDP graduated a ton, but not sure what they have left, They practically dress half the school on the sideline. Spalding or Glenelg Country have a shot? Bryn Mawr and Roland Park?

Top 4
1. NDP
2. McD
3. SPSG
4. GCS


I’d put GCS as the top seed going in and probably MCD as two. Don’t believe the the bs SPSG would not do any better then last year they’ll finish mid pack again.



NDP wins the next two. They could field two competitive teams.


1. GCS
2. NDP
3. McD
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/15/19 04:09 AM
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/15/19 02:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in


There are a lot of talented freshmen coming in, however NDP doesn’t have the room for them on Varsity. Their JV will be the strongest out there because of it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/15/19 04:31 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in


There are a lot of talented freshmen coming in, however NDP doesn’t have the room for them on Varsity. Their JV will be the strongest out there because of it.


I can only speak to NDP's sophomore class. They have several SW and several TLC players. The rest of the top club players in town are split between McDonough and St Pauls and then sprinkled among the rest of the schools in town. That group of NDP sophomores is very, very good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/15/19 06:23 PM
St. Marys has a chance to be really good. Everyone pretty much returns from last year and they picked up a solid 2020 goalie that transferred. A
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/15/19 06:33 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in


There are a lot of talented freshmen coming in, however NDP doesn’t have the room for them on Varsity. Their JV will be the strongest out there because of it.


I can only speak to NDP's sophomore class. They have several SW and several TLC players. The rest of the top club players in town are split between McDonough and St Pauls and then sprinkled among the rest of the schools in town. That group of NDP sophomores is very, very good.

Glenelg Country has a very good senior class but very young after that..2 jr, 4 soph and 13 fresh.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/16/19 01:50 PM
Hopefully someone can take down McD but every year the parents of NDP and the other preps talk trash because they have a D on the team. Every year their is an excuse about the coaching or injuries etc.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/16/19 08:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hopefully someone can take down McD but every year the parents of NDP and the other preps talk trash because they have a D on the team. Every year their is an excuse about the coaching or injuries etc.


Every year parents of ALL schools, not just NDP, talk trash about how they will beat McD and then don’t. Well, except NDP. They have earned the right to talk trash.
It will be a good year for a lot of schools. The 2022 class is a very talented one across the board and that will make for some really good lacrosse games this season.
Good luck to everyone.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 03:39 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in


There are a lot of talented freshmen coming in, however NDP doesn’t have the room for them on Varsity. Their JV will be the strongest out there because of it.


I can only speak to NDP's sophomore class. They have several SW and several TLC players. The rest of the top club players in town are split between McDonough and St Pauls and then sprinkled among the rest of the schools in town. That group of NDP sophomores is very, very good.


The talent on the 21 SW team is at JC, SPSG, BM, McD and Gerstell. None of the 2021 SW girls at NDP are difference makers. There is one TLC 2021 girl at NDP that is good. I'd ease up on the very, very good talk.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 03:07 PM
Is there such a thing as lacrosse scholarships for girls high school sports? Which schools? Or do they just hide through financial aid?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 05:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Is there such a thing as lacrosse scholarships for girls high school sports? Which schools? Or do they just hide through financial aid?


Gerstell openly advertises athletic scholarships. Other schools hide behind financial aid and named scholarships where part of the criteria is athletic prowess.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 05:13 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who does NDP have coming back? Any big time freshman coming in


There are a lot of talented freshmen coming in, however NDP doesn’t have the room for them on Varsity. Their JV will be the strongest out there because of it.


I can only speak to NDP's sophomore class. They have several SW and several TLC players. The rest of the top club players in town are split between McDonough and St Pauls and then sprinkled among the rest of the schools in town. That group of NDP sophomores is very, very good.


The top 2021's in the area are at McD, SPSG, Glenelg Country and a lot are at public schools. Bryn Mawr has a few. SPSG has 12 2021 girls from M&D, SW, Heros and TLC. McD has half that but they are all good players. GCS has most of the top Heros girls. You use the excuse that most of the NDP freshman weren't on varsity last year because there are so many players there. But if that's the case shouldn't NDP's JV team have been better last year?

NDP lost a ton of talent from last year's team. And contrary to popular belief there isn't a bunch of talent there to replace them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 09:46 PM
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/19 10:30 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 01:23 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 01:51 PM
Financial aid packages are available if you are a great lacrosse player. This is how Mcd and preps stay loaded with talent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 02:37 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 03:14 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 03:36 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.


What about for a 2021 from a "non-traditional area"? Plays on a good club team. Would it be a worthwhile event to measure herself against other players?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 04:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.


Funny. This is always the response. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend. But from what I was told last year was no better other than they gave out a lot of swag to make up for the lack of coaches. As I've said, none of the top girls attend anymore. Look at last year's rosters. Their still up on the site. There are hardly any M&D, SW, YJ 2021 girls. On the bright side it's much easier to get an invite now. In fact, both the Nike 120 and UA 150 were still sending out emails trying to get girls to attend only a few weeks out from the event last year.

By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on. It is what it is. The girls are in high school. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 04:53 PM
Originally Posted by cltlax
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.


What about for a 2021 from a "non-traditional area"? Plays on a good club team. Would it be a worthwhile event to measure herself against other players?


The top players aren't going to be at UA 150. So not sure it's the best place to measure herself against them. If it's a non-traditional area, you should have a good shot at making the Schoolgirls team or UA Underclass team. Those two events have tons of coaches and don't cost much(UA Underclass is free if you make the team). Other than that, you are much better off spending the money going to a couple camps of schools that your daughter is interested in. Especially if those schools have shown interest in your daughter. At this point most girls should know some schools that are interested in her. Plan your summer accordingly.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 05:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.


Funny. This is always the response. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend. But from what I was told last year was no better other than they gave out a lot of swag to make up for the lack of coaches. As I've said, none of the top girls attend anymore. Look at last year's rosters. Their still up on the site. There are hardly any M&D, SW, YJ 2021 girls. On the bright side it's much easier to get an invite now. In fact, both the Nike 120 and UA 150 were still sending out emails trying to get girls to attend only a few weeks out from the event last year.

By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on. It is what it is. The girls are in high school. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

Lets dissect your wandering response:
1. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

My daughter did not attend nor apply last year so therefore I did not tell anyone about it.

2. Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was.

Did she attend or not..it's a pretty simple answer

3. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend.

Wait a minute. If she maybe attended 2 years ago and saw how useless it was why did she apply again last year. I'm stumped

4. By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on

No where on the UA 150 webiste does it say anything about instruction. It's about the games and the Parisi combine

5. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

My daughter was on the UA All American Baltimore Command team last year..was yours?

Like I said it's usually the parents who did not apply in time or weren't accepted that belittle these type of events. I saw it last year with the UA All American games. Parent's who were late in applying or who's kid did not make the cut belittled the tournament as useless
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 06:42 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by cltlax
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.


What about for a 2021 from a "non-traditional area"? Plays on a good club team. Would it be a worthwhile event to measure herself against other players?


The top players aren't going to be at UA 150. So not sure it's the best place to measure herself against them. If it's a non-traditional area, you should have a good shot at making the Schoolgirls team or UA Underclass team. Those two events have tons of coaches and don't cost much(UA Underclass is free if you make the team). Other than that, you are much better off spending the money going to a couple camps of schools that your daughter is interested in. Especially if those schools have shown interest in your daughter. At this point most girls should know some schools that are interested in her. Plan your summer accordingly.

apparently many of the area's top 22's and 21'su are going this year. Word was out on the college list for 2019
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 06:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour 150 emails went out. Is there a consensus on this event?


What about for a 2021 from a "non-traditional area"? Plays on a good club team. Would it be a worthwhile event to measure herself against other players?


The top players aren't going to be at UA 150. So not sure it's the best place to measure herself against them. If it's a non-traditional area, you should have a good shot at making the Schoolgirls team or UA Underclass team. Those two events have tons of coaches and don't cost much(UA Underclass is free if you make the team). Other than that, you are much better off spending the money going to a couple camps of schools that your daughter is interested in. Especially if those schools have shown interest in your daughter. At this point most girls should know some schools that are interested in her. Plan your summer accordingly.

apparently many of the area's top 22's and 21'su are going this year. Word was out on the college list for 2019


Not sure who you are talking to, but the top 2021s are not going to UA 150 this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 07:09 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.


Funny. This is always the response. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend. But from what I was told last year was no better other than they gave out a lot of swag to make up for the lack of coaches. As I've said, none of the top girls attend anymore. Look at last year's rosters. Their still up on the site. There are hardly any M&D, SW, YJ 2021 girls. On the bright side it's much easier to get an invite now. In fact, both the Nike 120 and UA 150 were still sending out emails trying to get girls to attend only a few weeks out from the event last year.

By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on. It is what it is. The girls are in high school. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

Lets dissect your wandering response:
1. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

My daughter did not attend nor apply last year so therefore I did not tell anyone about it.

2. Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was.

Did she attend or not..it's a pretty simple answer

3. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend.

Wait a minute. If she maybe attended 2 years ago and saw how useless it was why did she apply again last year. I'm stumped

4. By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on

No where on the UA 150 webiste does it say anything about instruction. It's about the games and the Parisi combine

5. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

My daughter was on the UA All American Baltimore Command team last year..was yours?

Like I said it's usually the parents who did not apply in time or weren't accepted that belittle these type of events. I saw it last year with the UA All American games. Parent's who were late in applying or who's kid did not make the cut belittled the tournament as useless



My daughter was also on UA Underclass team last year. Went to UA 150 and Nike 120 two years ago. They were both a waste of time and money. She applied because we had not yet made a decision on whether she would go again but when the time came we decided not to spend the money. Instead she went to 2 college camps last summer for not much more money.

My comment about instruction was in comparison in what you get for the money when you go to a camp. Playing 6 games in front of mostly D3 coaches is not worth the exorbitant fees in my opinion. There are games being played on 4 fields. You will be lucky for your daughter to be watched twice over a 2 day span by any of the few good D1 schools.

What exactly is the benefit of the Parisi Combine? There is none. Do you really think college coaches give a darn about the results?

These used to be great events when they were held in January. Tons of coaches came as it was during their down time. When they changed the recruiting calendar it ruined them. Coaches are on the road every weekend watching tournament games all summer. UA 150 is the week between Nike G8 and Mid-Atlantic. It's easy for Maryland, Loyola, Navy, etc to attend as they're local. USC is always there because they just stay on east coast that week. Most coaches don't want to stay in MD all week after being in Jersey that weekend, they want to go home for a few days.

The event serves a purpose for certain kids. As long as your expectations are not too high in terms of exposure by all means go ahead and attend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 07:55 PM
I would rather my daughter spend $600 and get seen by 3 coaches on her list than spend the same amount on one camp where you get instruction from current players, some who never touch the field. I guess this is where that “to each his own” statement comes into play.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 08:08 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.


Funny. This is always the response. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend. But from what I was told last year was no better other than they gave out a lot of swag to make up for the lack of coaches. As I've said, none of the top girls attend anymore. Look at last year's rosters. Their still up on the site. There are hardly any M&D, SW, YJ 2021 girls. On the bright side it's much easier to get an invite now. In fact, both the Nike 120 and UA 150 were still sending out emails trying to get girls to attend only a few weeks out from the event last year.

By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on. It is what it is. The girls are in high school. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

Lets dissect your wandering response:
1. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

My daughter did not attend nor apply last year so therefore I did not tell anyone about it.

2. Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was.

Did she attend or not..it's a pretty simple answer

3. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend.

Wait a minute. If she maybe attended 2 years ago and saw how useless it was why did she apply again last year. I'm stumped

4. By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on

No where on the UA 150 webiste does it say anything about instruction. It's about the games and the Parisi combine

5. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

My daughter was on the UA All American Baltimore Command team last year..was yours?

Like I said it's usually the parents who did not apply in time or weren't accepted that belittle these type of events. I saw it last year with the UA All American games. Parent's who were late in applying or who's kid did not make the cut belittled the tournament as useless



My daughter was also on UA Underclass team last year. Went to UA 150 and Nike 120 two years ago. They were both a waste of time and money. She applied because we had not yet made a decision on whether she would go again but when the time came we decided not to spend the money. Instead she went to 2 college camps last summer for not much more money.

My comment about instruction was in comparison in what you get for the money when you go to a camp. Playing 6 games in front of mostly D3 coaches is not worth the exorbitant fees in my opinion. There are games being played on 4 fields. You will be lucky for your daughter to be watched twice over a 2 day span by any of the few good D1 schools.

What exactly is the benefit of the Parisi Combine? There is none. Do you really think college coaches give a darn about the results?

These used to be great events when they were held in January. Tons of coaches came as it was during their down time. When they changed the recruiting calendar it ruined them. Coaches are on the road every weekend watching tournament games all summer. UA 150 is the week between Nike G8 and Mid-Atlantic. It's easy for Maryland, Loyola, Navy, etc to attend as they're local. USC is always there because they just stay on east coast that week. Most coaches don't want to stay in MD all week after being in Jersey that weekend, they want to go home for a few days.

The event serves a purpose for certain kids. As long as your expectations are not too high in terms of exposure by all means go ahead and attend.

thanks for your approval to attend, it means so much. BTW there are no college camps or these types events that will have over 35 colleges attending and they are a mixture of Top D1 all the way through NAIA. The more exposure the more options for schools to pick from. Even the UA All American games did not draw that many coaches for the Command or Highlight Underclass games. Yes college coaches do care about the speed results from the combine because you CANNOT TEACH SPEED..any college coach in any sport will tell you that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 08:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.

Everyone who says this is not worthwhile either did apply in time or did not get accepted. it's not any more expensive than similar tournaments and the list of colleges attending is much better than last year.


Funny. This is always the response. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend. But from what I was told last year was no better other than they gave out a lot of swag to make up for the lack of coaches. As I've said, none of the top girls attend anymore. Look at last year's rosters. Their still up on the site. There are hardly any M&D, SW, YJ 2021 girls. On the bright side it's much easier to get an invite now. In fact, both the Nike 120 and UA 150 were still sending out emails trying to get girls to attend only a few weeks out from the event last year.

By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on. It is what it is. The girls are in high school. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

Lets dissect your wandering response:
1. I bet your daughter was selected as an all star last year at the UA150 and you made sure to tell everyone about it to.

My daughter did not attend nor apply last year so therefore I did not tell anyone about it.

2. Maybe my daughter attended two years ago and saw how useless it was.

Did she attend or not..it's a pretty simple answer

3. My daughter was invited last year but did not attend.

Wait a minute. If she maybe attended 2 years ago and saw how useless it was why did she apply again last year. I'm stumped

4. By all means spend the money for a day and a half of lacrosse if you want. There is no instruction going on

No where on the UA 150 webiste does it say anything about instruction. It's about the games and the Parisi combine

5. They should be trying to make their regional Under Armour teams.

My daughter was on the UA All American Baltimore Command team last year..was yours?

Like I said it's usually the parents who did not apply in time or weren't accepted that belittle these type of events. I saw it last year with the UA All American games. Parent's who were late in applying or who's kid did not make the cut belittled the tournament as useless



My daughter was also on UA Underclass team last year. Went to UA 150 and Nike 120 two years ago. They were both a waste of time and money. She applied because we had not yet made a decision on whether she would go again but when the time came we decided not to spend the money. Instead she went to 2 college camps last summer for not much more money.

My comment about instruction was in comparison in what you get for the money when you go to a camp. Playing 6 games in front of mostly D3 coaches is not worth the exorbitant fees in my opinion. There are games being played on 4 fields. You will be lucky for your daughter to be watched twice over a 2 day span by any of the few good D1 schools.

What exactly is the benefit of the Parisi Combine? There is none. Do you really think college coaches give a darn about the results?

These used to be great events when they were held in January. Tons of coaches came as it was during their down time. When they changed the recruiting calendar it ruined them. Coaches are on the road every weekend watching tournament games all summer. UA 150 is the week between Nike G8 and Mid-Atlantic. It's easy for Maryland, Loyola, Navy, etc to attend as they're local. USC is always there because they just stay on east coast that week. Most coaches don't want to stay in MD all week after being in Jersey that weekend, they want to go home for a few days.

The event serves a purpose for certain kids. As long as your expectations are not too high in terms of exposure by all means go ahead and attend.

Please do not listen to this person...if your daughter applied and was excepted then by all means have her go. It cannot be a bad thing to be seen by head or assistant coaches from all or any of these colleges. Their bad experience may be your good experience
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 08:40 PM
enough on the merits of the UA 150. Lets get back to the HS spring season.

what schools will be good in the Public schools? 4A?, 3A? 2A? 1A?

how about the IAAM B & C divison

Can Taylor Cummings be a successful head coach?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 08:49 PM
Of course coaches like speed. Do you really think coaches go look at the results from the UA 150 parisi combine though? Of course not.

The UA Underclass games are free to play in as opposed to the crazy high fee for UA150. And you're crazy if you don't think there weren't more coaches from top D1 schools there than UA150.

UA150 costs twice as much as it should for what is provided. You get less exposure there than you will at G8 the weekend before or Mid-Atlantic the weekend after. If the goal is to just play games in front of college coaches tournaments blow UA150 out of the water. Camps are better if your daughter is interested in the school and wants to be able to actually interact with the coaches and current players and get a feel for the program.

Again, to each their own.
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 09:28 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by cltlax
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


$$$ grab. No top girls went last year. Not a good list of colleges attending.


Notre Dame, Syracuse, Hopkins, Loyola, Florida... when did they fall off the “good list”?


If you think it's worth all the money by all means shell it out. Chris will appreciate it I'm sure. There's a reason all the top players stopped attending.


What about for a 2021 from a "non-traditional area"? Plays on a good club team. Would it be a worthwhile event to measure herself against other players?


The top players aren't going to be at UA 150. So not sure it's the best place to measure herself against them. If it's a non-traditional area, you should have a good shot at making the Schoolgirls team or UA Underclass team. Those two events have tons of coaches and don't cost much(UA Underclass is free if you make the team). Other than that, you are much better off spending the money going to a couple camps of schools that your daughter is interested in. Especially if those schools have shown interest in your daughter. At this point most girls should know some schools that are interested in her. Plan your summer accordingly.

apparently many of the area's top 22's and 21'su are going this year. Word was out on the college list for 2019


Per the above mention, trying to figure out what coaches will be there this year. I can only find the 2018 list. Thanks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 09:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Of course coaches like speed. Do you really think coaches go look at the results from the UA 150 parisi combine though? Of course not.

The UA Underclass games are free to play in as opposed to the crazy high fee for UA150. And you're crazy if you don't think there weren't more coaches from top D1 schools there than UA150.

UA150 costs twice as much as it should for what is provided. You get less exposure there than you will at G8 the weekend before or Mid-Atlantic the weekend after. If the goal is to just play games in front of college coaches tournaments blow UA150 out of the water. Camps are better if your daughter is interested in the school and wants to be able to actually interact with the coaches and current players and get a feel for the program.

Again, to each their own.

once again, thanks for your approval
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/19 10:09 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Of course coaches like speed. Do you really think coaches go look at the results from the UA 150 parisi combine though? Of course not.

The UA Underclass games are free to play in as opposed to the crazy high fee for UA150. And you're crazy if you don't think there weren't more coaches from top D1 schools there than UA150.

UA150 costs twice as much as it should for what is provided. You get less exposure there than you will at G8 the weekend before or Mid-Atlantic the weekend after. If the goal is to just play games in front of college coaches tournaments blow UA150 out of the water. Camps are better if your daughter is interested in the school and wants to be able to actually interact with the coaches and current players and get a feel for the program.

Again, to each their own.

once again, thanks for your approval


You're right. They asked for an honest response on if the UA 150. It's the best $600 you can spend.

That better?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/19 01:32 AM


Per the above mention, trying to figure out what coaches will be there this year. I can only find the 2018 list. Thanks.[/quote]


On the home page there is a box scrolling through this year's college list. Definitely includes names that aren't on the 2018 list.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/19 02:11 AM
"Other than that, you are much better off spending the money going to a couple camps of schools that your daughter is interested in. Especially if those schools have shown interest in your daughter. At this point most girls should know some schools that are interested in her. Plan your summer accordingly."
[/quote]

What if girls don't know where they are interested in going or who is interested in them yet? Especially 2022's? Might be better served for now to be at UA in front of a variety of schools than going a specific school's summer camp yet. Looks like a good variety of schools. True that not a lot of players from top-tier teams were on the rosters the past years. And lack of high level schools. But now that recruiting guidelines have changed, it could have an effect on the caliber of this event - both in terms of colleges and players. A couple of years ago top girls were already committed by the time they were the ages of this year's UA150 players. I don't know the answers. But things to think about.
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 02/21/19 01:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Per the above mention, trying to figure out what coaches will be there this year. I can only find the 2018 list. Thanks.



On the home page there is a box scrolling through this year's college list. Definitely includes names that aren't on the 2018 list. [/quote]

I hadn't focused on the scroll - I see now. Much appreciated!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/19 05:14 PM
McDonogh's schedule and roster are online.

https://www.mcdonogh.org/athletics/teams-schedules/sport/girls-lacrosse/girls-varsity-lacrosse/2182
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/19 06:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Good luck to them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/26/19 04:18 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/26/19 05:10 PM
That roster is bigger than most colleges....14-16 girls will see the field ...at most.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/26/19 08:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?


Seniors and Freshman that pay the coach $100 a hour for personal training haha
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 03:06 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?


Seniors and Freshman that pay the coach $100 a hour for personal training haha



Isn't that a serious conflict of interest when the coach TC is also a private lessons instructor using school property for lessons.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 01:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?


Seniors and Freshman that pay the coach $100 a hour for personal training haha



Isn't that a serious conflict of interest when the coach TC is also a private lessons instructor using school property for lessons.


This happens at a lot more schools than McD... whether its private lessons or club affiliation
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 02:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?


Seniors and Freshman that pay the coach $100 a hour for personal training haha

Yes but just being on the team will get them recruited to sit on a bench for a college team
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 02:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Big roster. A third of those girls are seniors that will never play I assume?


Seniors and Freshman that pay the coach $100 a hour for personal training haha

Yes but just being on the team will get them recruited to sit on a bench for a college team

Well aren’t you snarky. Guessing your daughter was either recently cut or kept a lot of metal warm when she played.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 02:58 PM
FYI-what a waste of $$$. Let your D be a huge star at Public HS instead of paying money to sit the bench . College coaches don't watch HS lax just check the stats . I pulled my D from prep school 28,000 a year to public and she is committed to Ivy school now -go figure.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 03:26 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI-what a waste of $$$. Let your D be a huge star at Public HS instead of paying money to sit the bench . College coaches don't watch HS lax just check the stats . I pulled my D from prep school 28,000 a year to public and she is committed to Ivy school now -go figure.

depends on your view of what a 'waste' is. many of these girls playing lax in private schools are not paying full price anyway. if you D is playing in the IAAM A then they are playing against top competition every game and probably in practice making them better for the summer club season when the college coaches are watching. My guess your daughter was getting into an Ivy regardless of a public or private education. Congrats and good for her.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 04:53 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI-what a waste of $$$. Let your D be a huge star at Public HS instead of paying money to sit the bench . College coaches don't watch HS lax just check the stats . I pulled my D from prep school 28,000 a year to public and she is committed to Ivy school now -go figure.

depends on your view of what a 'waste' is. many of these girls playing lax in private schools are not paying full price anyway. if you D is playing in the IAAM A then they are playing against top competition every game and probably in practice making them better for the summer club season when the college coaches are watching. My guess your daughter was getting into an Ivy regardless of a public or private education. Congrats and good for her.


I know people say high school isn't important for recruiting but it is important in training. High school coaches get your daughter 6 times a week for 2 months. Club is twic a week for 2 hours. Playing on a good high school team goes a far way in making them better players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/19 08:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
FYI-what a waste of $$$. Let your D be a huge star at Public HS instead of paying money to sit the bench . College coaches don't watch HS lax just check the stats . I pulled my D from prep school 28,000 a year to public and she is committed to Ivy school now -go figure.

depends on your view of what a 'waste' is. many of these girls playing lax in private schools are not paying full price anyway. if you D is playing in the IAAM A then they are playing against top competition every game and probably in practice making them better for the summer club season when the college coaches are watching. My guess your daughter was getting into an Ivy regardless of a public or private education. Congrats and good for her.


I know people say high school isn't important for recruiting but it is important in training. High school coaches get your daughter 6 times a week for 2 months. Club is twic a week for 2 hours. Playing on a good high school team goes a far way in making them better players.


How much of a sales job is needed to convince your daughter that it's a good thing she's sitting at the tail end of a 40 man roster at a private school but, in the long run, the practices are worth it to further her career in college? Good god, high school sports should be about actually playing, if they have the ability, since they only have 4 years to enjoy it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/04/19 02:09 PM
The sales pitch was the need to be at the private school in the first place. You will find this out but when the kids get recruited -the teams that will want them will not be the schools they want to attend academically. IAAM is great competition for HS lacrosse but most of the kids on the bench will not see the field in college either so pick the right fit for your child and if it doesnt work out -walk away from lacrosse. Also put that money in a 529 account instead of prep school coffers.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/04/19 05:28 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The sales pitch was the need to be at the private school in the first place. You will find this out but when the kids get recruited -the teams that will want them will not be the schools they want to attend academically. IAAM is great competition for HS lacrosse but most of the kids on the bench will not see the field in college either so pick the right fit for your child and if it doesnt work out -walk away from lacrosse. Also put that money in a 529 account instead of prep school coffers.

only go to a private prep if you are recruited by the coach. If you are on the coaches wish list then you are probably on varsity as freshmen and getting some playing time from the start... also probably getting a nice break in tuition.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/04/19 05:38 PM
It's the same sales pitch given by the top few clubs around MD to pad their rosters and increase the amount of money brought in by each team to the clubs' bank accounts. Nothing will replace playing time. Suddenly there's this pitch that being on the tale end a certain club teams' roster is "great" because even if you don't play you're "practicing with the best". And parents actually buy it. Yes you're on a winning team but if you're not in the top half of the team it's useless.

Man I wish I came up with this lie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/06/19 04:11 PM
Something else to consider... - better yet here is the real truth that should be told...
The college lacrosse coaches will not let the contact date be moved up because these coaches are now making too much money from their camps.
Coaches want recruiting pushed back because coaches make huge money from the extra two years of camps from the Sophomore and Junior players who now go.
Coaches did not push recruiting back because it "was in the best interest of the players" they pushed it back because "it was in the best interest of coaches' pocketbooks". Follow the money!
Coaches want you to believe it is an amazing coincidence that the extra two months of July and August that the coaches claim "are needed so the players can mature" just happen to be the exact two months when coaches run their camps. What an amazing coincidence!
Players do not magically mature in July & August. It is because July and August are when coaches run their money making camps.
Sorry players, the NCAA, just like US Lacrosse, will put the money before the players.
By the way...
-Proposal 2018-93 is for June 15th contact
-Proposal 2018-93-2 is for Sept 1st contact
Please email:
bjames@miami.edu
athdir@pobox.upenn.edu
and tell them to vote June 15th not Sept 1st
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/07/19 05:43 PM
SR from DC scrimmaged McD Varsity up 8-6 at the half, ended up losing 11-10.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/08/19 12:31 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
SR from DC scrimmaged McD Varsity up 8-6 at the half, ended up losing 11-10.

final scores for scrimmages mean nothing. most teams are playing everyone if possible to see what they have.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/08/19 01:22 PM
How are the Maryland Public Schools going to be this year? Did Glenelg lose many girls? Hereford, Westminster should be pretty good?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/08/19 06:09 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
SR from DC scrimmaged McD Varsity up 8-6 at the half, ended up losing 11-10.


The coaches gave every McDonogh player playing time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/19 12:05 PM
What you say about college coaches is just not true of all of them. I spoke to a college coach about a month ago who is in favor of the contact date being moved to June. In fact, I believe the coaches are the ones who suggested to change. We will see how the vote goes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/19 02:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
SR from DC scrimmaged McD Varsity up 8-6 at the half, ended up losing 11-10.


The coaches gave every McDonogh player playing time.


False. Every McDonogh player did not play in that game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/19 03:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What you say about college coaches is just not true of all of them. I spoke to a college coach about a month ago who is in favor of the contact date being moved to June. In fact, I believe the coaches are the ones who suggested to change. We will see how the vote goes.


The coaches did not suggest the change to 6/15. The NCAA Student Athlete Experience Committee did after a multi-year study. The IWLCA and IMLCA decided at their conferences this fall to submit a proposal to remove lacrosse from the 6/15 proposal. This was submitted by the ACC for vote in April. There are multiple versions of the proposal up for vote and lacrosse has requested to keep 9/1. I agree there are coaches that think 6/15 is a good idea, but the coach associations have selfishly requested to keep 9/1. Send emails!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/19 06:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


Looks like they are coming up to NY play Manhasset. That will be fun. Also notice Manhasset will be going to CALIFORNIA to play Torrey Pines mid season. That has to be a first. Pretty crazy that they would travel to California. Wonder if Torrey Pines subsidized part of that trip.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/13/19 03:12 PM
I think Glenelg should repeat (again). Century has improved (several transfers from South Carroll), not sure about Hereford but they always seem to be contenders.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/14/19 11:00 AM
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/14/19 12:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/14/19 01:22 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.

of course there will be...this is a preseason ranking. most of these teams haven't even played a game yet
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/14/19 03:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.

of course there will be...this is a preseason ranking. most of these teams haven't even played a game yet


You're right. NDP will drop quite a bit once the season starts. They lost way too much and don't have anyone to replace them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/15/19 01:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.

of course there will be...this is a preseason ranking. most of these teams haven't even played a game yet


You're right. NDP will drop quite a bit once the season starts. They lost way too much and don't have anyone to replace them.


McDonogh won't be at the top for long and probably won't even win the IAAM. They only topped Spalding 6-5 yesterday at home, scoring the game winner with under 20 seconds left. It should be interesting to see which team rises up and replaces them. It's certainly there for the taking.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/15/19 03:22 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.

of course there will be...this is a preseason ranking. most of these teams haven't even played a game yet


You're right. NDP will drop quite a bit once the season starts. They lost way too much and don't have anyone to replace them.


McDonogh won't be at the top for long and probably won't even win the IAAM. They only topped Spalding 6-5 yesterday at home, scoring the game winner with under 20 seconds left. It should be interesting to see which team rises up and replaces them. It's certainly there for the taking.



NDP is not going anywhere. They have the best sophomore class in the country.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/16/19 05:30 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
IL Preseason top 25

1.McDonogh School (Md.)
2.Manhasset (N.Y.)
3.Eastport South Manor (N.Y.)
4.Mt. Sinai (N.Y.)
5.Notre Dame Prep (Md.)
6.American Heritage (Fla.)
7.Bishop Ireton (D.C.)
8.Sts. Stephen's & Agnes (Va.)
9.Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
10.Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
11.Garden City (N.Y.)
12.Moorestown (N.J.)
13.Glenelg (Md.)
14.Christian Brothers Academy (N.Y.)
15.Darien (Conn.)
16.Ridgewood (N.J)
17.St. Paul's SG (Md.)
18.Northport (N.Y)
19.Holton-Arms School (Md.)
20.Summit (N.J)
21.Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22.Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
23.New Canaan (Conn.)
24.Novato (Calif.)
25.Glenelg Country School (Md.)


There will be quite a bit of movement. Compare this list to the one released three weeks from now.

of course there will be...this is a preseason ranking. most of these teams haven't even played a game yet


You're right. NDP will drop quite a bit once the season starts. They lost way too much and don't have anyone to replace them.


McDonogh won't be at the top for long and probably won't even win the IAAM. They only topped Spalding 6-5 yesterday at home, scoring the game winner with under 20 seconds left. It should be interesting to see which team rises up and replaces them. It's certainly there for the taking.



NDP is not going anywhere. They have the best sophomore class in the country.


Is this a joke? If their sophomores are so good why was only one on varsity last year?

They didn't help them much this morning in their 20-10 loss
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 05:43 PM
McDonogh 6 - Spalding 5
Glenelg Country 11 - John Carroll 10
Maryvale 13 - Severn 8
SPSG 16 - Maryvale 8
RPCS 11 - St. Marys 7
Bryn Mawr 15 - Gerstell 8
John Carroll 10 - Gerstell 9

Looks like there's quite a bit of parity this year in IAAM. Should be a lot of close games. RPCS and NDP got beaten pretty badly out of conference this weekend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 06:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
McDonogh 6 - Spalding 5
Glenelg Country 11 - John Carroll 10
Maryvale 13 - Severn 8
SPSG 16 - Maryvale 8
RPCS 11 - St. Marys 7
Bryn Mawr 15 - Gerstell 8
John Carroll 10 - Gerstell 9

Looks like there's quite a bit of parity this year in IAAM. Should be a lot of close games. RPCS and NDP got beaten pretty badly out of conference this weekend.


Who beat NDP?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 06:59 PM
American Heritage Delray won 20-10.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 08:13 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
American Heritage Delray won 20-10.


No way they lost that bad. NDP has the best sophomore class in the country.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 08:49 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
American Heritage Delray won 20-10.


No way they lost that bad. NDP has the best sophomore class in the country.



Any freshmen on varsity?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 08:53 PM
that may be true....but the best Sophomore class and NDP got beat 20-10.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 08:55 PM
for?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/17/19 09:02 PM
American Heritage School of Boca/Delray won Saturday against NDP with a score of 20-10 in Orlando. Believe it. They play McDonogh tomorrow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/18/19 03:40 AM
It was a joke. NDP doesn't have the best sophomore class in the country. They don't have the best sophomore class in the IAAM. Most of their sophs are from TLC or are bench players for SW. Only two of them made varsity as freshman and only one contributed. Their JV team wasn't very good last year which wouldn't make sense if it was supposedly loaded with all these great sophomores that didn't make varsity last year. The best two 2021 club teams in Baltimore are SW and M&D. None of their top players are at NDP. NDP lost a TON of talent from last year's team and there is no one there to replace them.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/18/19 03:22 PM
Sun preseason rankings:
1. McDonogh
2. NDP
3. Glenelg Country
4. Glenelg
5. Marriotts Ridge
6. Spalding
7. St. Mary's
8. South River
9. Roland Park
10. St. Paul's
11. Hereford
12. Westminster
13. Severna Park
14. Century
15. Catonsville

Thought?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/18/19 05:44 PM
St Paul's should move to # 2 on that list. NDP should move to #5
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/18/19 06:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
St Paul's should move to # 2 on that list. NDP should move to #5


Based on what?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/19/19 01:35 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
St Paul's should move to # 2 on that list. NDP should move to #5


Based on what?


Based on the fact that St. Paul's has the best sophomore class in the country.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/19/19 03:59 PM
McDonogh dominate again. Will the dynasty ever die. 18-9 over American Heritage.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/19/19 05:06 PM
Considering St Pauls just beat Bishop Ireton - ranked nationally # 3. Ranked MidAtlantic #2
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/19/19 05:32 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Considering St Pauls just beat Bishop Ireton - ranked nationally # 3. Ranked MidAtlantic #2

St Pauls should be 3 in the bmore area. Glenelg Country is over ranked. They lost to some team from GA yesterday
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/20/19 01:46 PM
Hi. Just posting here because some may have seen this before when their girls were younger. My daughter will be in high school in 2 years.
Has this ever happened or is this a thing?
My daughter plays club. Another friend from school plays club as well. They don’t see each other as much since they go to different schools now.

Not to overload you with details but as moms we used to share info like what camps are good vs waste of money etc. Now as middle schoolers it seems people are holding onto info more tightly and not sharing as much. We did a random camp this summer and this friend shows up where In the old days I would have heard about it from her mom but not anymore. I don’t think her mom wants her daughter playing with my daughter. Sounds weird bc they used to be good buddies from an old team. Just wondering if this sounds common or normal.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/20/19 03:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi. Just posting here because some may have seen this before when their girls were younger. My daughter will be in high school in 2 years.
Has this ever happened or is this a thing?
My daughter plays club. Another friend from school plays club as well. They don’t see each other as much since they go to different schools now.

Not to overload you with details but as moms we used to share info like what camps are good vs waste of money etc. Now as middle schoolers it seems people are holding onto info more tightly and not sharing as much. We did a random camp this summer and this friend shows up where In the old days I would have heard about it from her mom but not anymore. I don’t think her mom wants her daughter playing with my daughter. Sounds weird bc they used to be good buddies from an old team. Just wondering if this sounds common or normal.


The mom is also not telling you that she is paying money for her daughter to work with a personal trainer and a separate lax trainer.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/21/19 04:24 PM
Yes ... this happens. But no it's not normal. Parents do not tell their friends and other parents from their teams about camps, leagues, training, out of club tournaments. Who knows why - probably to give their daughter a leg up.

When I played youth soccer our coach told every player and parents about every opportunity he heard of for extra play and arranged for us to do a couple things together. He wanted everyone on the team to get better - not just his daughter. It's not that way anymore

There are parents (one is particularly egregious) who take 1/2 of their club team and play in tournaments, camps, leagues, etc. and completely exclude the other girls on the team. No actually - its a group of parents. They're not playing in club sponsored activities so no one can actually stop them but you would think common decency would stop it. And they'd NEVER let that happen to their own children but that's the new normal. Worry about what benefits & advances your child and maybe a select few others . For all others - well too bad for them.

It will only get worse when your daughter gets to high school and the competition for things like looks from colleges/under armour, all american, and nike teams/write ups in the papers/spots on varsity & JV/ etc.

Use a forum like this to ask about certain camps. You'll probably get a better answer from anonymous parents on here who aren't worried about your kid outshining theirs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/21/19 06:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes ... this happens. But no it's not normal. Parents do not tell their friends and other parents from their teams about camps, leagues, training, out of club tournaments. Who knows why - probably to give their daughter a leg up.

When I played youth soccer our coach told every player and parents about every opportunity he heard of for extra play and arranged for us to do a couple things together. He wanted everyone on the team to get better - not just his daughter. It's not that way anymore

There are parents (one is particularly egregious) who take 1/2 of their club team and play in tournaments, camps, leagues, etc. and completely exclude the other girls on the team. No actually - its a group of parents. They're not playing in club sponsored activities so no one can actually stop them but you would think common decency would stop it. And they'd NEVER let that happen to their own children but that's the new normal. Worry about what benefits & advances your child and maybe a select few others . For all others - well too bad for them.

It will only get worse when your daughter gets to high school and the competition for things like looks from colleges/under armour, all american, and nike teams/write ups in the papers/spots on varsity & JV/ etc.

Use a forum like this to ask about certain camps. You'll probably get a better answer from anonymous parents on here who aren't worried about your kid outshining theirs

All of the camps, tournaments, UA sponsored events are all on the internet. All you need to do is search for it. I did not need any other parent to tell me about one of these events. I researched them and figured out which ones were worth paying for. Do not be dependent on others when all that is needed is a little research effort.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/22/19 03:35 PM
Ahhh the fat man strikes again
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/22/19 05:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes ... this happens. But no it's not normal. Parents do not tell their friends and other parents from their teams about camps, leagues, training, out of club tournaments. Who knows why - probably to give their daughter a leg up.

When I played youth soccer our coach told every player and parents about every opportunity he heard of for extra play and arranged for us to do a couple things together. He wanted everyone on the team to get better - not just his daughter. It's not that way anymore

There are parents (one is particularly egregious) who take 1/2 of their club team and play in tournaments, camps, leagues, etc. and completely exclude the other girls on the team. No actually - its a group of parents. They're not playing in club sponsored activities so no one can actually stop them but you would think common decency would stop it. And they'd NEVER let that happen to their own children but that's the new normal. Worry about what benefits & advances your child and maybe a select few others . For all others - well too bad for them.

It will only get worse when your daughter gets to high school and the competition for things like looks from colleges/under armour, all american, and nike teams/write ups in the papers/spots on varsity & JV/ etc.

Use a forum like this to ask about certain camps. You'll probably get a better answer from anonymous parents on here who aren't worried about your kid outshining theirs


Ah yes, the "if everyone can't do it then no one should be able to do it" thought process. Does everyone on the team have to be friends all the time? It sounds like they are excluding some but not all. Maybe you can take the reins and your own time and efforts and organize a few things and someone will reciprocate for you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/19 07:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes ... this happens. But no it's not normal. Parents do not tell their friends and other parents from their teams about camps, leagues, training, out of club tournaments. Who knows why - probably to give their daughter a leg up.

When I played youth soccer our coach told every player and parents about every opportunity he heard of for extra play and arranged for us to do a couple things together. He wanted everyone on the team to get better - not just his daughter. It's not that way anymore

There are parents (one is particularly egregious) who take 1/2 of their club team and play in tournaments, camps, leagues, etc. and completely exclude the other girls on the team. No actually - its a group of parents. They're not playing in club sponsored activities so no one can actually stop them but you would think common decency would stop it. And they'd NEVER let that happen to their own children but that's the new normal. Worry about what benefits & advances your child and maybe a select few others . For all others - well too bad for them.

It will only get worse when your daughter gets to high school and the competition for things like looks from colleges/under armour, all american, and nike teams/write ups in the papers/spots on varsity & JV/ etc.

Use a forum like this to ask about certain camps. You'll probably get a better answer from anonymous parents on here who aren't worried about your kid outshining theirs


All these camps, 7v7's, etc are on the schools website. Some parents research these things and some don't. It's not someone else's job to make sure your daughter attends certain events. 7v7s and things like that have a limited allowed roster size. Yes certain players like playing together in these things. Doesn't mean they are excluding others but usually girls prefer to play with the girls they are closer to. Put another team together if your daughter wants to go and she wasn't asked to be on a team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/19 07:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Ahhh the fat man strikes again


Who is the fat man? M&D goalie dad?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/24/19 08:35 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes ... this happens. But no it's not normal. Parents do not tell their friends and other parents from their teams about camps, leagues, training, out of club tournaments. Who knows why - probably to give their daughter a leg up.

When I played youth soccer our coach told every player and parents about every opportunity he heard of for extra play and arranged for us to do a couple things together. He wanted everyone on the team to get better - not just his daughter. It's not that way anymore

There are parents (one is particularly egregious) who take 1/2 of their club team and play in tournaments, camps, leagues, etc. and completely exclude the other girls on the team. No actually - its a group of parents. They're not playing in club sponsored activities so no one can actually stop them but you would think common decency would stop it. And they'd NEVER let that happen to their own children but that's the new normal. Worry about what benefits & advances your child and maybe a select few others . For all others - well too bad for them.

It will only get worse when your daughter gets to high school and the competition for things like looks from colleges/under armour, all american, and nike teams/write ups in the papers/spots on varsity & JV/ etc.

Use a forum like this to ask about certain camps. You'll probably get a better answer from anonymous parents on here who aren't worried about your kid outshining theirs


All these camps, 7v7's, etc are on the schools website. Some parents research these things and some don't. It's not someone else's job to make sure your daughter attends certain events. 7v7s and things like that have a limited allowed roster size. Yes certain players like playing together in these things. Doesn't mean they are excluding others but usually girls prefer to play with the girls they are closer to. Put another team together if your daughter wants to go and she wasn't asked to be on a team.


I can see what parent you are, good luck.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/02/19 03:07 PM
Regarding 2018-93, the $ greedy college coaches want to keep the lacrosse date 9/1 because 9/1 enables coaches to run another round of money making summer camps .
If the date was 6/15 coaches would commit the "true recruits" the coaches were truly interested in on 6/15 and then the 100's of mislead non-recruits would not go to the coaches' money making camps.
The coaches had a stronger argument when they moved recruiting back 3 YEARS. But now the extra 2 MONTHS coaches want are just for the coaches to make money on 2 months of camps.
Players do not miraculously mature in those last 2 months. It is those 2 months the coaches want to make more money from camps.
The lacrosse coaches want 9/1 instead of 6/15 because of $ greed.
As usual US Lacrosse has sold out to the money and the coaches instead of putting the kids first. Let's hope the NCAA puts the kids first this time.
The NCAA needs to stand up to the coaches and make the date 6/15 like the other sports.
email addresses:
bjames@miami.edu
athdir@pobox.upenn.edu
Proposal #'s:
2018-93 is for June 15th contact like other sports
2018-93-2 is Lax Coach Camp $ greed Sept 1
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/02/19 05:56 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Regarding 2018-93, the $ greedy college coaches want to keep the lacrosse date 9/1 because 9/1 enables coaches to run another round of money making summer camps .
If the date was 6/15 coaches would commit the "true recruits" the coaches were truly interested in on 6/15 and then the 100's of mislead non-recruits would not go to the coaches' money making camps.
The coaches had a stronger argument when they moved recruiting back 3 YEARS. But now the extra 2 MONTHS coaches want are just for the coaches to make money on 2 months of camps.
Players do not miraculously mature in those last 2 months. It is those 2 months the coaches want to make more money from camps.
The lacrosse coaches want 9/1 instead of 6/15 because of $ greed.
As usual US Lacrosse has sold out to the money and the coaches instead of putting the kids first. Let's hope the NCAA puts the kids first this time.
The NCAA needs to stand up to the coaches and make the date 6/15 like the other sports.
email addresses:
bjames@miami.edu
athdir@pobox.upenn.edu
Proposal #'s:
2018-93 is for June 15th contact like other sports
2018-93-2 is Lax Coach Camp $ greed Sept 1


Sorry. I am all for 9/1
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 04/02/19 06:34 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Regarding 2018-93, the $ greedy college coaches want to keep the lacrosse date 9/1 because 9/1 enables coaches to run another round of money making summer camps .
If the date was 6/15 coaches would commit the "true recruits" the coaches were truly interested in on 6/15 and then the 100's of mislead non-recruits would not go to the coaches' money making camps.
The coaches had a stronger argument when they moved recruiting back 3 YEARS. But now the extra 2 MONTHS coaches want are just for the coaches to make money on 2 months of camps.
Players do not miraculously mature in those last 2 months. It is those 2 months the coaches want to make more money from camps.
The lacrosse coaches want 9/1 instead of 6/15 because of $ greed.
As usual US Lacrosse has sold out to the money and the coaches instead of putting the kids first. Let's hope the NCAA puts the kids first this time.
The NCAA needs to stand up to the coaches and make the date 6/15 like the other sports.
email addresses:
bjames@miami.edu
athdir@pobox.upenn.edu
Proposal #'s:
2018-93 is for June 15th contact like other sports
2018-93-2 is Lax Coach Camp $ greed Sept 1


Sorry. I am all for 9/1


I'm all for no more spamming all the threads with the same 6/15 post.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/05/19 06:07 PM
God forbid someone tells parents how the coaches are not acting in the kids best interest. Coach
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/05/19 07:32 PM
Thanks coach / camp director!
June 15th gives an informed player the choice to attend camp or not.
September 1st keeps the power, information and the player's money in the hands of the coaches.
September 1st keeps players in the dark and allows coaches to take more of the ignorant player's money.
Here is a little secret...everybody gets invited to the camp with a personalized "first name" email invitation...don't get fooled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/05/19 08:58 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thanks coach / camp director!
June 15th gives an informed player the choice to attend camp or not.
September 1st keeps the power, information and the player's money in the hands of the coaches.
September 1st keeps players in the dark and allows coaches to take more of the ignorant player's money.
Here is a little secret...everybody gets invited to the camp with a personalized "first name" email invitation...don't get fooled.



Hey, any news on the 6/15 recruiting?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/06/19 03:44 PM
No, that information has been deemed classified by the "no spammer" coach.

No really, not sure the date of the vote.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/10/19 04:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
No, that information has been deemed classified by the "no spammer" coach.

No really, not sure the date of the vote.




The vote is next Friday 4/19
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/12/19 12:46 PM
When will the shot clock be used for IAAM? It is needed.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/12/19 05:25 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When will the shot clock be used for IAAM? It is needed.


I 100% agree with this statement.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/12/19 05:48 PM
I agree with Shot clock as well. I also think the yellow card should be released if goal is scored. One yellow card in HS can ruin a great game. Keep like college. Give them one goal not 5 in 2 minutes. Not to be hard on refs but they ruined a game this year with multiple questionable yellows which turned into multiple goals. The impact of a yellow in HS is multiplied. That is a rules issue, not refs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/14/19 02:35 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
When will the shot clock be used for IAAM? It is needed.


I 100% agree with this statement.


8+ minutes of stalling at the end of a game is pretty ridiculous and no one gets better from that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/19 10:23 PM
June 15th gives an informed player the choice to attend camp or not.
September 1st keeps the power, information and the player's money in the hands of the coaches.
September 1st keeps players in the dark and allows coaches to take more of the ignorant player's money.
Here is a little secret...everybody gets invited to the camp with a personalized "first name" email invitation...don't get fooled.[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

No really, not sure the date of the vote.


The vote is next Friday 4/19[/quote

The June 15th date is bad for the coaches because coaches want players to keep going to their $$ camps.
If it was June 15th then players would be able to make a much more informed decision as to what coaches had TRUE interest, not just fake marketing campaigns to lure kids who the coaches have zero interest in.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/15/19 11:18 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
June 15th gives an informed player the choice to attend camp or not.
September 1st keeps the power, information and the player's money in the hands of the coaches.
September 1st keeps players in the dark and allows coaches to take more of the ignorant player's money.
Here is a little secret...everybody gets invited to the camp with a personalized "first name" email invitation...don't get fooled.[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

No really, not sure the date of the vote.


The vote is next Friday 4/19[/quote

The June 15th date is bad for the coaches because coaches want players to keep going to their $$ camps.
If it was June 15th then players would be able to make a much more informed decision as to what coaches had TRUE interest, not just fake marketing campaigns to lure kids who the coaches have zero interest in.

you really don't like the coaches do you? What happened? Your little superstar not get recruited and ended up at a JUCO.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/17/19 01:11 AM
Bet you couldn't keep the ball off the ground, under pressure, for 8 + minutes.

That being said, I want a shot clock as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/17/19 01:26 PM
The coaches are misleading everyone, some could say flat out lying to everyone.

This change is not about recruiting in 6th grade or any other type of early recruiting.

This is about 78 days.

What is the benefit of waiting 78 days?
Until someone tells me differently I can only think it is an additional 78 days of camps.

What do the children get by having access 78 days sooner?
Seems to me that the PSA can use that 78 days to use real information to evaluate where they want to spend 4 years of their lives.
Some will even be able to start their Junior year of HS and the others will also have their process start a little sooner.

Again this is about 78 days........NOT Early recruiting. Early recruiting has been stopped.
Posted By: cltlax Re: Girls High School - 04/17/19 03:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The coaches are misleading everyone, some could say flat out lying to everyone.

This change is not about recruiting in 6th grade or any other type of early recruiting.

This is about 78 days.

What is the benefit of waiting 78 days?
Until someone tells me differently I can only think it is an additional 78 days of camps.

What do the children get by having access 78 days sooner?
Seems to me that the PSA can use that 78 days to use real information to evaluate where they want to spend 4 years of their lives.
Some will even be able to start their Junior year of HS and the others will also have their process start a little sooner.

Again this is about 78 days........NOT Early recruiting. Early recruiting has been stopped.



Staying at 9/1 does allow for an entire summer tournament season, though.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/19/19 06:51 PM
Guess you're going to have to keep shelling out the bucks for those hated coaches summer camps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/20/19 12:47 PM
Just like they wanted. We are lambs being led.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/25/19 02:16 PM
I have a 2023 in NGLL A.
What are some good camps and the camps we should avoid?
I feel like we have grown out of any camps that offer middle school ages.
We are looking at
Maximum exposure
Univ of Maryland
Penn State
UA Command

How does this look? Possibly missing anything?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/25/19 02:30 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have a 2023 in NGLL A.
What are some good camps and the camps we should avoid?
I feel like we have grown out of any camps that offer middle school ages.
We are looking at
Maximum exposure
Univ of Maryland
Penn State
UA Command

How does this look? Possibly missing anything?


Save your money. Too early to worry about recruiting camps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/25/19 04:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have a 2023 in NGLL A.
What are some good camps and the camps we should avoid?
I feel like we have grown out of any camps that offer middle school ages.
We are looking at
Maximum exposure
Univ of Maryland
Penn State
UA Command

How does this look? Possibly missing anything?


Save your money. Too early to worry about recruiting camps.


I agree. Save your money. With recruiting change, your rising freshman won’t get looked at. If she is NGLL A, then my guess is her summer is filled with tournaments. That will be plenty.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/25/19 04:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have a 2023 in NGLL A.
What are some good camps and the camps we should avoid?
I feel like we have grown out of any camps that offer middle school ages.
We are looking at
Maximum exposure
Univ of Maryland
Penn State
UA Command

How does this look? Possibly missing anything?


Save your money. Too early to worry about recruiting camps.


I agree. Save your money. With recruiting change, your rising freshman won’t get looked at. If she is NGLL A, then my guess is her summer is filled with tournaments. That will be plenty.

skip the camps. have her tryout for the UA Command team. see how she compares to some of the best of the 22/23 classes
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/09/19 05:08 PM
Quite a surprise St. Paul's getting to finals against McDonogh. The last game between them went to double OT. St. Paul's have a real chance at an upset?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/19 12:44 PM
Amazing game by St Pauls and McDonogh in the IAAM Conference A Championship on Saturday. Double overtime win by McDonogh but could have been won by either team. Packed stands at Gerstell Academy for the game. Beautiful campus. Goalie for St Pauls was a lockdown stud. Maryland high school girls lacrosse have such tremendous athletes.
Lax On !!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/19 01:19 PM
MG has a young team at SPSG. She'll be back next year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/16/19 06:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
MG has a young team at SPSG. She'll be back next year


But someone told me NDP hair the best sophomore class in the country?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 12:41 PM
Under Armour Baltimore - I hear the numbers of girls tryout out yesterday were down significantly versus last year, especially for the older team. This was the must do event of the summer for the last several years. Why are the numbers down?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 03:14 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour Baltimore - I hear the numbers of girls tryout out yesterday were down significantly versus last year, especially for the older team. This was the must do event of the summer for the last several years. Why are the numbers down?

It's not the recruiting tournament it claims to be and it's just another money grab for Corrigan Sports . had a daughter tryout for the command team the last year and this year and there was a big difference in the process from last year to this year. more evaluators for the command team had kids trying out for the command team than last year, one evaluator had 2 kids trying out. to much heros and m&d involvement in the evaluation process and it showed in the callback game. i must say it was not a very well run or thought out eval process this year. last year was much better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 06:54 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour Baltimore - I hear the numbers of girls tryout out yesterday were down significantly versus last year, especially for the older team. This was the must do event of the summer for the last several years. Why are the numbers down?


Fake news. The numbers were almost identical to last year for both groups. Ton of talent out there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 06:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour Baltimore - I hear the numbers of girls tryout out yesterday were down significantly versus last year, especially for the older team. This was the must do event of the summer for the last several years. Why are the numbers down?

It's not the recruiting tournament it claims to be and it's just another money grab for Corrigan Sports . had a daughter tryout for the command team the last year and this year and there was a big difference in the process from last year to this year. more evaluators for the command team had kids trying out for the command team than last year, one evaluator had 2 kids trying out. to much heros and m&d involvement in the evaluation process and it showed in the callback game. i must say it was not a very well run or thought out eval process this year. last year was much better.


Your daughter must be the SW girl that made Command last year and didn't this year? The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 06:58 PM
Now begins the flow of parents trashing the UA Tournament and team selection process because their little superstar didn't make the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/20/19 09:58 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Under Armour Baltimore - I hear the numbers of girls tryout out yesterday were down significantly versus last year, especially for the older team. This was the must do event of the summer for the last several years. Why are the numbers down?

It's not the recruiting tournament it claims to be and it's just another money grab for Corrigan Sports . had a daughter tryout for the command team the last year and this year and there was a big difference in the process from last year to this year. more evaluators for the command team had kids trying out for the command team than last year, one evaluator had 2 kids trying out. to much heros and m&d involvement in the evaluation process and it showed in the callback game. i must say it was not a very well run or thought out eval process this year. last year was much better.


Your daughter must be the SW girl that made Command last year and didn't this year? The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.
I’m guessing SW is for Skywalkers. She does not play on that club.. Just my opinion on the difference between last year and this year. I dint think the team has been announced yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 04:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 06:43 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 06:48 PM
Since this thread is active let me ask.... we are thinking of switching clubs this year...for many reasons. My daughter will be in HS shortly.
For example what would M&D be looking for at tryouts when they keep winning and winning anyways? Isn’t their team all set just the way it is? Are there players in every team secretly marked “disposable” vs the “keepers”
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 07:43 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


NDP varsity finished third in regular season and didn't make the playoff final four. NDP JV took multiple losses in the regular season. But NDP has the most girls on the UA team. Okkkaaaayyyyy.....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 07:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


This is terrible, HC should be ashamed. Making a joke out of the UA Games. I think people are going to realize that UA is no longer what it once was when you have this stuff going on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 07:58 PM
Does Mac Ford have anything to do with this? He is one of the coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 08:11 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


NDP varsity finished third in regular season and didn't make the playoff final four. NDP JV took multiple losses in the regular season. But NDP has the most girls on the UA team. Okkkaaaayyyyy.....


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 09:00 PM
Let’s see what happens when they play in the tournament . Got a feeling this roster could get eaten up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 09:35 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm



That’s neither here nor there. There are also 8th graders who made the team, girls from a varsity team that doesn’t hold tryouts, and girls who ride the bench on their varsity teams throughout the season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 09:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm



That’s neither here nor there. There are also 8th graders who made the team, girls from a varsity team that doesn’t hold tryouts, and girls who ride the bench on their varsity teams throughout the season.


Being on varsity is meaningless. Many varsity teams would lose to the top jv programs and fresh soph teams
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 09:59 PM
That particular 8th grader would make 9/10 varsity teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 10:04 PM

[/quote]

So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm[/quote]

Which varsity school would that be?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 10:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since this thread is active let me ask.... we are thinking of switching clubs this year...for many reasons. My daughter will be in HS shortly.
For example what would M&D be looking for at tryouts when they keep winning and winning anyways? Isn’t their team all set just the way it is? Are there players in every team secretly marked “disposable” vs the “keepers”

Go tryout. No team will turn down a top player
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 10:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm



That’s neither here nor there. There are also 8th graders who made the team, girls from a varsity team that doesn’t hold tryouts, and girls who ride the bench on their varsity teams throughout the season.


Being on varsity is meaningless. Many varsity teams would lose to the top jv programs and fresh soph teams


That is probably the dumbest statement posted today. Congrats you win the internet!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 10:48 PM
Yes they did leave money on the table without a doubt especially some game 23s that are better then the bottom 3-4 22s that made it. This is still a good line up though and will do fine in the tournament and let’s be honest this is supposed to be a recruiting tournament and college coaches don’t want to see 23s yet. Probably a good idea to not even allow them to participate except for the $$ they would be turning away.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/21/19 11:14 PM
. [/quote]

Being on varsity is meaningless. Many varsity teams would lose to the top jv programs and fresh soph teams[/quote]

That is probably the dumbest statement posted today. Congrats you win the internet![/quote]


Ben Carson already won that award Oreo
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 01:33 AM
The Highlight head coach didn't put a single player from his school on the team.

The NDP girls that made the command team play for M&D and SW. If they didn't play well at the tryout they wouldn't be on the team. UA really is based on how the girls do in those 4 or 5 hours. They don't take into account where they play or whether they are on JV or Varsity because that can differ based on where they go to school.

All I've seen is complaining based on where kids go to school and not arguing that the girls that made the team didn't play well on Sunday. I'm guessing that they played well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 01:37 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
That particular 8th grader would make 9/10 varsity teams.


As is the JV player who made it, and many others who play JV. People need to stop knocking JV.

Congratulations to all of those who made the team. Baltimore will be very hard to beat.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 02:08 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


NDP varsity finished third in regular season and didn't make the playoff final four. NDP JV took multiple losses in the regular season. But NDP has the most girls on the UA team. Okkkaaaayyyyy.....


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm


You should read the player bios. Four out of the five NDP girls who made the Command roster played varsity this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 02:12 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


NDP varsity finished third in regular season and didn't make the playoff final four. NDP JV took multiple losses in the regular season. But NDP has the most girls on the UA team. Okkkaaaayyyyy.....


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm


You should read the player bios. Four out of the five NDP girls who made the Command roster played varsity this year.


And no NDP players on Highlight roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 03:19 AM
T
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous


The process was actually much better this year and coaches actually didn't force their own players onto the team.


Roster is out.

You say the coaches didn't force their own player onto the team. Then explain why there are 5 NDP girls and the HC of the Command team is from NDP. NDP has the most players from any school.


NDP varsity finished third in regular season and didn't make the playoff final four. NDP JV took multiple losses in the regular season. But NDP has the most girls on the UA team. Okkkaaaayyyyy.....


So let's take girls from JV at NDP, but ignore the girls that play varsity at the other schools....Hmmmm


You should read the player bios. Four out of the five NDP girls who made the Command roster played varsity this year.


Do those 5 girls play for top club teams?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 03:28 AM
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 11:39 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does Mac Ford have anything to do with this? He is one of the coaches.

He and the other 2 assistant coaches are at the tryouts and are involved in making the final roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 11:55 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 12:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 01:23 PM
If you can’t have your kids in the IAAM schools for whatever reason, get them on a good club and make it work. We have a girl from frederick on our Baltimore team. She carpools with another family. Not everyone on the team is private school. You just have to play the best to get better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 01:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


Whatever. The truth is if your daughter is really talented she will have a good chance. It's a tough team to make. Check the command and highlight rosters from last two years. It's a lot of the same girls and several of them don't play for the coaches of the UA team. People complain and complain, but sometimes talent wins out. There are a ton of evaluators at the tryouts. Different evaluators each year. And yet some of these same girls make it multiple times. These are also the same girls that will commit to the top college programs but I guess you feel like the college coaches don't know what they are doing either.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 02:11 PM
Everyone is beating a dead horse. The same evaluator, plus or minus a few will always be the evaluators until their own daughters/club players graduate. Accept and move on or like the post said earlier get off the merry go round.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 02:26 PM
Stop beating a dead horse. This area will have the same dad coach evaluators, plus or minus a few until their daughters and or club players graduate, and then the cycle will start over with the younger age groups. Either accept and move on or like the previous post said get off the merry go round. Whether players got special treatment or not because of who the evaluators and coaches are, every name on that list is a strong, athletic, fast player and well deserving, whether 8th grade, JV, bench V or V.

Most of them probably read this forum, so why not congratulate them instead.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 03:32 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since this thread is active let me ask.... we are thinking of switching clubs this year...for many reasons. My daughter will be in HS shortly.
For example what would M&D be looking for at tryouts when they keep winning and winning anyways? Isn’t their team all set just the way it is? Are there players in every team secretly marked “disposable” vs the “keepers”


Take a look at the UA Highlight roster. Of the 23 girls, 10 play for M&D 2020 or 2021, 6 play for SW 2020 or 2021. If your daughter is good enough M&D or SW will take her. The earlier you get her there the better as those clubs do the best job developing talent. There are always girls at he bottom of the roster that are replaceable, but once you get to high school the rosters basically lock down. At tryouts they are looking for athletes with good stick skills and high lacrosse IQ. Doesn't hurt to tryout and see.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 03:41 PM
https://events.r2it.com/lacrosse/UnderArmour/Roster/Division/Underclass#

Congratulations to those who made it. DC tryouts are nearby if you want a change of venue
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/22/19 04:07 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Since this thread is active let me ask.... we are thinking of switching clubs this year...for many reasons. My daughter will be in HS shortly.
For example what would M&D be looking for at tryouts when they keep winning and winning anyways? Isn’t their team all set just the way it is? Are there players in every team secretly marked “disposable” vs the “keepers”


Take a look at the UA Highlight roster. Of the 23 girls, 10 play for M&D 2020 or 2021, 6 play for SW 2020 or 2021. If your daughter is good enough M&D or SW will take her. The earlier you get her there the better as those clubs do the best job developing talent. There are always girls at he bottom of the roster that are replaceable, but once you get to high school the rosters basically lock down. At tryouts they are looking for athletes with good stick skills and high lacrosse IQ. Doesn't hurt to tryout and see.


Call up MD & SW, they are always looking for new players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/30/19 07:03 PM
OK- Girls going into grade 9 do not need to tryout for their current club teams?
Why are SW and MD and a few others holding tryouts?
Daughters club is not having tryout for her age level - grade 9. Club is demanding payment for the next year right away which doesn't give you a chance to try out or look around at others unless you want to be late on payments?
How do the coaches fill in holes on our team if not holding tryouts?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/31/19 12:46 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
OK- Girls going into grade 9 do not need to tryout for their current club teams?
Why are SW and MD and a few others holding tryouts?
Daughters club is not having tryout for her age level - grade 9. Club is demanding payment for the next year right away which doesn't give you a chance to try out or look around at others unless you want to be late on payments?
How do the coaches fill in holes on our team if not holding tryouts?


They don't. Clubs other than M&D and SW get more holes, not fill them. In 9th grade, when girls go "tryout" for M&D and SW they have already been offered a spot and the tryout is a mere formality.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/27/19 07:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Let’s see what happens when they play in the tournament . Got a feeling this roster could get eaten up.


I posted this just after the Bal Comand roster was released seems like I could be the next Nostradamus!
Bal just got eaten up 18-9 by Conny. Great job Coach Mac putting your girls in a position to fail.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/27/19 08:29 PM
Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/27/19 09:26 PM

[quote=Anonymous]Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.

My next prediction as the wizard is they’ll go 1-3 in pool play picking up there lonely win against Southwest and won’t even make the playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/28/19 12:15 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.




Not sure what game you were watching, but the Balt team was terrible. Middies slow, not fast enough to transition or get back on defense. It's gonna be a long weekend watching this show.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/28/19 02:25 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.



The Conny team came out firing and never stopped, and Baltimore was shell shocked. They won 90% of the draws, and the Baltimore defense failed miserably, which left the goalies high and dry. #1 on Conny could not be stopped, and beat every defender on her for the feed inside the 8m or the drive to goal herself.
Baltimore team is stacked and will regroup. The coaching staff is too good not to change the issues for the games that count.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/28/19 11:55 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous

[quote=Anonymous]Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.

My next prediction as the wizard is they’ll go 1-3 in pool play picking up there lonely win against Southwest and won’t even make the playoffs.



would you look at that.... Baltimore Command Girls are now 2 and 0 in pool play. you are a wizard!!!! keep the predictions coming.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/30/19 03:04 AM
2-2 impressive way to back into the playoffs. Such high expectations for what should be the #1 team in the country if the coaches would of chosen more wisely. You should be so proud Ann your daughter is truly a beast couldn’t be more happier for you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 06/30/19 11:24 PM
Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/01/19 12:39 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous

[quote=Anonymous]Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.

My next prediction as the wizard is they’ll go 1-3 in pool play picking up there lonely win against Southwest and won’t even make the playoffs.


Hey Wizard... you need to stick to your day job Baltimore Command wins UA underclass tournament!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/01/19 06:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!



I'll chirp.. I was there with the LI team.. I didn't think we would beat the CONNY team and thought we had a better chance against Baltimore.. Turns out we didnt. Congrats to the Balt girls they proved their mettle by beating CONNY when it mattered, and a more rested LI team for the title.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/01/19 08:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!



I'll chirp.. I was there with the LI team.. I didn't think we would beat the CONNY team and thought we had a better chance against Baltimore.. Turns out we didnt. Congrats to the Balt girls they proved their mettle by beating CONNY when it mattered, and a more rested LI team for the title.


CONNY command team definitely had the best player. Had Baltimore not played CONNY on Thursday CONNY would have won yesterday. Mary G and Mac are too good of coaches to let one player beat them twice. They had a plan and while she still played a great game it wasn't enough.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/01/19 09:37 PM
Wow LI parent ..... it's nice to see a congratulatory and kind comment on this board. From a Baltimore parent ... Thank You. All the girls played their hearts out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/01/19 11:16 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/02/19 02:31 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/02/19 10:41 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?


My daughter's team (another region, not Baltimore) had a dad coach who handled the offense and tried to run things mainly through his daughter, and unfortunately for the team she's not good enough to do that at UA level. Stronger players were played out of position, subbed out more often, and micromanaged to run plays geared toward getting his kid points. It hurt the team, although the best players still ended up being the top performers because that's what good players do. She wasn't good enough to be on the team, let alone be a key offensive player. Hopefully someone in the region will step up and prevent a repeat next year.
Posted By: NorthEastLaxer Re: Girls High School - 10/07/19 05:48 PM
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/11/19 07:54 PM
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 11/29/19 10:46 PM
darn someone is salty. Just figured out this board. The Baltimore Team had no dad coaches. All 3 coaches worked with 15 evaluators to find the best team. Which I guess they did a pretty good job of. Connys best player played in same club as their coaches but I guess that’s a sore spot too. The girls that had the best tryouts made the team. Try saying that 1 time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/01/19 12:22 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
darn someone is salty. Just figured out this board. The Baltimore Team had no dad coaches. All 3 coaches worked with 15 evaluators to find the best team. Which I guess they did a pretty good job of. Connys best player played in same club as their coaches but I guess that’s a sore spot too. The girls that had the best tryouts made the team. Try saying that 1 time.

Dude, you just figured out this board? Everyone has moved on from this topic but you it seems.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/01/19 12:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?


My daughter's team (another region, not Baltimore) had a dad coach who handled the offense and tried to run things mainly through his daughter, and unfortunately for the team she's not good enough to do that at UA level. Stronger players were played out of position, subbed out more often, and micromanaged to run plays geared toward getting his kid points. It hurt the team, although the best players still ended up being the top performers because that's what good players do. She wasn't good enough to be on the team, let alone be a key offensive player. Hopefully someone in the region will step up and prevent a repeat next year.


Happens at Boys UA too. No matter how hard CS and UA try to spin it as independent evaluations it isnt. They do get many of top players but some are left out due to not knowing the coach...Frankly I think it is worst in non hotbed areas
where knowing coach has a bigger impact due to less impact players, Balt along with other hotbed areas can leave off a few top players and still field a great team. ................. Dont expect things to change,
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/01/19 05:41 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.


Not sure why you’d think SPSG is going to be a top team. Basically a 500 team last year in the regular season and got a easy draw in the playoffs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/01/19 06:46 PM
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/01/19 11:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 02:51 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also


We hear that every year, only to see that they are the same ole bridesmaid, come the season play. I guess if you say it enough, that when it does happen, you all can say "I told you so".

Who are they adding to make a difference?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 04:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also


We hear that every year, only to see that they are the same ole bridesmaid, come the season play. I guess if you say it enough, that when it does happen, you all can say "I told you so".

Who are they adding to make a difference?


GCS lost some of their top talent when the seniors graduated. It will be a rebuilding year with such a young squad, but I think they will be able to give some of those you mentioned a good game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 04:49 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.


Not sure why you’d think SPSG is going to be a top team. Basically a 500 team last year in the regular season and got a easy draw in the playoffs.

Agree SPSG will not be in top 3.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 05:36 PM
GCS is a young team with only a handful of JR's and SR's. Expect them to fall back a bit this year. If all the sophomores and freshmen they have develop they should be a very good team in 21 & 22.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 06:07 PM
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 07:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 10:41 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/02/19 11:55 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.



Like the above posters said, 28-9 since moving to A in 2017, and have appeared in the semis all 3 years. Strong 2023 and 2022 classes will make them a favorite next year. They may or may not struggle this year, it will be interesting to see. Losing seniors every year doesn’t seem to be an issue, they still make the semis.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 01:34 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.


spoken like a true McD parent or player. Guessing your McD kid rides the bench or is a jv player
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 06:08 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also


New to this thread. What schools are SPSG and GCS? Thanks.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 06:58 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also


New to this thread. What schools are SPSG and GCS? Thanks.


Exactly
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 07:58 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.



GCS will be good also


New to this thread. What schools are SPSG and GCS? Thanks.

Saint Paul School for Girls and Glenelg Country School
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 08:17 PM
Outside of the private schools, a few county thoughts:
Howard County: Two schools will contend for title: Glenelg and Marriotts Ridge
AA County: Severna Park
Carroll: Century or Westminster
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/03/19 11:54 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Outside of the private schools, a few county thoughts:
Howard County: Two schools will contend for title: Glenelg and Marriotts Ridge
AA County: Severna Park
Carroll: Century or Westminster


MRs days are over. Really only have one really strong player at this point. Not saying they lose to anyone other the Glenelg but they don’t have a shot at beating them either..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/04/19 01:06 AM
I think SPSG will be in the top 3 because they lost to McD twice in OT and return all but a few starters from last year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/04/19 06:16 PM
Hereford for Baltimore County. I do not see MR in the same light as previous post. I think they will be pretty legit for the next few years
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/04/19 10:01 PM
Hereford ? Lost their 2 studs and didn’t win vs a weaker team in states last year. As long as that coach stays they will under achieve ! Count on it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/05/19 02:49 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think SPSG will be in the top 3 because they lost to McD twice in OT and return all but a few starters from last year.



Fair assessment. At least you had a basis for what you said. Any new talent coming in? Still seem weak on the JV team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/05/19 08:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.


Not sure why you’d think SPSG is going to be a top team. Basically a 500 team last year in the regular season and got a easy draw in the playoffs.


NDP and GCS were an easy draw in the playoffs last year? They took McD to double OT in both games last year and led most of the game both times. They had 6 losses last year and 4 of them were in OT or double OT. One was a one goal game and other was a 2 goal game. SPSG lost far less talent than any other teams. They lost 3 starters to ACL's last year that are back plus a transfer junior that will add more offense. Their defense was one of the tops in the league and all 4 starters are back for the 3rd straight season. They have 2 solid goalies this year. Not sure why anyone would think they won't be strong this season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 12/07/19 11:41 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.


Not sure why you’d think SPSG is going to be a top team. Basically a 500 team last year in the regular season and got a easy draw in the playoffs.


NDP and GCS were an easy draw in the playoffs last year? They took McD to double OT in both games last year and led most of the game both times. They had 6 losses last year and 4 of them were in OT or double OT. One was a one goal game and other was a 2 goal game. SPSG lost far less talent than any other teams. They lost 3 starters to ACL's last year that are back plus a transfer junior that will add more offense. Their defense was one of the tops in the league and all 4 starters are back for the 3rd straight season. They have 2 solid goalies this year. Not sure why anyone would think they won't be strong this season.

Geez, calm down, take a breath. Don’t worry, no one thinks that now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/09/20 02:06 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.


Since only 1 team has beaten McD in the past 10 years or so, I guess every other school in the conference is the little sister. Based on that criteria, no one else has been any good. Seriously, you don't find it at all somewhat impressive that GCS has made been a top 3 team in the league since they moved up to the B conference?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/09/20 03:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.


Since only 1 team has beaten McD in the past 10 years or so, I guess every other school in the conference is the little sister. Based on that criteria, no one else has been any good. Seriously, you don't find it at all somewhat impressive that GCS has made been a top 3 team in the league since they moved up to the B conference?


I do think it is impressive to make that jump and be one of the top teams in the A conference, but they are too young this year and I would imagine will drop back.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/28/20 02:03 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.


Since only 1 team has beaten McD in the past 10 years or so, I guess every other school in the conference is the little sister. Based on that criteria, no one else has been any good. Seriously, you don't find it at all somewhat impressive that GCS has made been a top 3 team in the league since they moved up to the B conference?


I do think it is impressive to make that jump and be one of the top teams in the A conference, but they are too young this year and I would imagine will drop back.


McD will still dominate. NDP will keep things interesting. GCS will surprise many. SPSG will be the team to beat.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/28/20 05:51 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
So who will be the top teams? Obviously McDonogh will start out that way.

SPSG is a .500 team, but very good coaching. Not sure they have anyone coming in to add value. But very good coaching. Will NDP be that good? They lost some power players and the JV is not that good.

Bryn Mar added some very good young goalies, but its Bryn Mar. Soooo....nope.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool.

Spalding loses a good amount of seniors, but returns some heavy hitters. Probably the best farm system JV team out there. They come in as national top25 team. Overreach perhaps? Coaching is suspect at times. Any young talent entering that program?

Will any others step up? Severn School...umm, No. St. Marys...has players. Gerstell...on the move for players but not there yet.

GCS is still the little sister trying to be cool...?...All they have done since moving to the A in 2017 is go 28-9 and make the semi final all 3 years. I'm pretty sure they're cooler than you.



Well...its a pretty top heavy league. Its always 4-5 team division. So being in that tier means you have something going for you all. Going to the semis every year is a fine feather for that hat. But what have they done against the top tier teams aligned with them?

They do not really compete with McDonogh, which is whom they are trying to emulate. So until that starts to happen, they will remain the little sister trying to be cool.

Be serious...GCS recruits heavily. That is no secret and they are not alone. They have the coaching ties and the name sake to throw around, but yet they just can not get over the hump. I am certain they will someday, but not there yet and not there this year.


Since only 1 team has beaten McD in the past 10 years or so, I guess every other school in the conference is the little sister. Based on that criteria, no one else has been any good. Seriously, you don't find it at all somewhat impressive that GCS has made been a top 3 team in the league since they moved up to the B conference?


I do think it is impressive to make that jump and be one of the top teams in the A conference, but they are too young this year and I would imagine will drop back.


McD will still dominate. NDP will keep things interesting. GCS will surprise many. SPSG will be the team to beat.


How can McD dominate but SPSG is the team to beat? Until someone beats McD you always assume McD will win. SPSG has a good starting group but doesn't have much depth which hurt them last year when they had so many injuries.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/28/20 02:02 PM
Someone did beat McD and they still dominate. You can dominate a season and still get beat I think is what they wee trying to say. SP issues are last years issues. Their injured players are back and they didn’t lose a lot of key players. NDP will be stronger than People think. They have a big roster to work with.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/29/20 01:52 AM
NDP roster is huge every year. Doesn’t make sense to have 40 girls dressed in uniform. How’s the MCD pipeline after this year? Has Taylor reloaded the roster, how will they look with her recruits? She’s basically us using Robinson’s players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/30/20 03:47 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NDP roster is huge every year. Doesn’t make sense to have 40 girls dressed in uniform. How’s the MCD pipeline after this year? Has Taylor reloaded the roster, how will they look with her recruits? She’s basically us using Robinson’s players.



One of the reasons CR left is because they were no longer supporting admission at the level they were in the past. After the 2020 class the amount of talent drops considerably. The 2021 class is weak. There are some good 2022 and 2023 players but they will no longer have the amazing depth they've had over the last decade plus.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/30/20 12:27 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NDP roster is huge every year. Doesn’t make sense to have 40 girls dressed in uniform. How’s the MCD pipeline after this year? Has Taylor reloaded the roster, how will they look with her recruits? She’s basically us using Robinson’s players.



One of the reasons CR left is because they were no longer supporting admission at the level they were in the past. After the 2020 class the amount of talent drops considerably. The 2021 class is weak. There are some good 2022 and 2023 players but they will no longer have the amazing depth they've had over the last decade plus.

Her hiring has been an advantage for other programs.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/30/20 06:28 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Someone did beat McD and they still dominate. You can dominate a season and still get beat I think is what they wee trying to say. SP issues are last years issues. Their injured players are back and they didn’t lose a lot of key players. NDP will be stronger than People think. They have a big roster to work with.


While McD went undefeated last year they had a lot of close games. Granted they won them all but they are definitely coming back to the pack. SPSG took them to double OT both games. They had 2 close games with Spalding. So I wouldn't necessarily say the dominated the league last year. At least not in the manor they used to.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/30/20 06:31 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NDP roster is huge every year. Doesn’t make sense to have 40 girls dressed in uniform. How’s the MCD pipeline after this year? Has Taylor reloaded the roster, how will they look with her recruits? She’s basically us using Robinson’s players.



One of the reasons CR left is because they were no longer supporting admission at the level they were in the past. After the 2020 class the amount of talent drops considerably. The 2021 class is weak. There are some good 2022 and 2023 players but they will no longer have the amazing depth they've had over the last decade plus.

Her hiring has been an advantage for other programs.


I don't know about that. Many kids(and parents) are drawn to McD because of her. Everyone in girls lacrosse knows who TC is and her name has a lot of pull. That said, I'm not sure how much work she puts into identifying talent at the younger ages that some of the other coaches do. That combined with the decline in admissions assistance makes it harder. We will see. I fully expect them to be very good this season but those players were brought in by CR. Next year should provide some clarity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 01/30/20 07:36 PM
The other A conference schools upgraded their coaching and started recruiting with offers of money and playing time. That is the reason Mcdonogh is not as deep as they have been in the past. NDP is a larger school and much less expensive, hence the big roster.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/06/20 04:15 PM
I wonder how successful these coaches would be at a public HS without the recruiting and CR rep.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/06/20 10:47 PM
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/07/20 04:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I wonder how successful these coaches would be at a public HS without the recruiting and CR rep.


CR coached at a public high school in Howard County and was very successful.

But I get what you're saying.... If private school had to work with whoever came to their school (via their geographic boundries) as opposed to recruiting like college coaches do - MOST would not be anywhere near as successful.

The same goes for academics.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/07/20 04:43 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I wonder how successful these coaches would be at a public HS without the recruiting and CR rep.


CR coached at a public high school in Howard County and was very successful.

But I get what you're saying.... If private school had to work with whoever came to their school (via their geographic boundries) as opposed to recruiting like college coaches do - MOST would not be anywhere near as successful.

The same goes for academics.

you put any of the private schools coaches at a public hs like glenelg, dulaney, hebron, hereford, townson, serverna park, southriver and to a certain extent catonsville they would be successful because these areas have good feeder programs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/08/20 04:00 AM
CAn anyone give any insight into what to expect playing at high school level vs what you’re used to in a competitive club level?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/09/20 07:39 PM
Totally depends on which HS. My D's played in hotbed area so HS team was from all the clubs in MD. Hard to get on the field and we won State Championships frequently . Some of the HS teams that were in the region were horrible and got smoked but if kid had a pulse they could start.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/10/20 01:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
CAn anyone give any insight into what to expect playing at high school level vs what you’re used to in a competitive club level?


It depends if you are talking IAAM or public. While there are some some good public school teams a majority of their schedule is against pretty weak competition. Playing in the IAAM is a grind. Much faster and much more physical that competitive 8th grade club lacrosse. Plenty of freshman have stepped up and been key players on teams though so if your daughter is up to the challenge there's no reason she can't be successful.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/10/20 04:00 PM
Spalding insider here. If they are going to make run at the playoffs this is the year. If the HC can keep the daddy ball in check they have a shot. Team has some talent. But there is nothing in the pipeline to keep them rolling. Jv this year will be B C level club players. Wish them all good luck.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/10/20 06:28 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Spalding insider here. If they are going to make run at the playoffs this is the year. If the HC can keep the daddy ball in check they have a shot. Team has some talent. But there is nothing in the pipeline to keep them rolling. Jv this year will be B C level club players. Wish them all good luck.



Haha you must be joking. Spalding V had a great run last year and strong girls are still on the team. Spalding JV was the strongest in the league. Daddy ball is at McDonogh.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/11/20 03:04 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Spalding insider here. If they are going to make run at the playoffs this is the year. If the HC can keep the daddy ball in check they have a shot. Team has some talent. But there is nothing in the pipeline to keep them rolling. Jv this year will be B C level club players. Wish them all good luck.



Haha you must be joking. Spalding V had a great run last year and strong girls are still on the team. Spalding JV was the strongest in the league. Daddy ball is at McDonogh.


Spalding has no goalie this year and Gunning was a key part of their success the last two years. KO will always keep them in games though
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/11/20 03:06 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/12/20 06:09 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Spalding insider here. If they are going to make run at the playoffs this is the year. If the HC can keep the daddy ball in check they have a shot. Team has some talent. But there is nothing in the pipeline to keep them rolling. Jv this year will be B C level club players. Wish them all good luck.



Haha you must be joking. Spalding V had a great run last year and strong girls are still on the team. Spalding JV was the strongest in the league. Daddy ball is at McDonogh.


Not sure by what metric you are basing your strongest JV claim by. They lost to SPSG and McD that I know of. And SPSG is a small school. If the girls were any good on the JV team they'd have been on Varsity.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 12:19 AM
Maryvale has an exceptional freshman class this year. Some of those girls will probably be on the varsity roster this year. Give them a year or two and they could be really good team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 12:23 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 02:51 AM
Tell your girls that all they need to do to be successful is to just score points.
Just shoot the ball in, don't be afraid.
Don't wait for the right time and just go for it.
Be brave and follow through.
Signed - Dad who has spent thousands of dollars and sat through countless games where the girls never got it together
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 03:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


BMS will be better this year as well. Several good players in the 9th and 10th grade. They will likely struggle against the bigger schools given their class sizes and ratio of mathlete/athlete but they will be competitive.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 03:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 03:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


BMS will be better this year as well. Several good players in the 9th and 10th grade. They will likely struggle against the bigger schools given their class sizes and ratio of mathlete/athlete but they will be competitive.


BM was competitive last year offensively but they couldn't defend and didn't have very good goalie play. Unless they get better on that end they will struggle
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 07:05 PM
M&D has girls going all over the place (#1 girl on team, if not the state, is at public) and the ones at McD are not going to make much of an impact. Unless TC can turn them into beasts - she loves athletic frames.
GCS should be really good, and Maryvale.
I hope NDP can put together a team of good ones, because they have a maybe one from 2023s that will make a difference.
BM has the best goalie in years. Plus some solid athletes.
SPSFG has some good ones.
The McD v NDP rivalry will fade away.

Lets get excited about the season everyone!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 07:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


How do you not think SW's it not one of the better teams? They have beat or been close to any top team. Beat M&D in the NXT tournament didn't they! So I guess you still don't know anything about the 2023's.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 07:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
M&D has girls going all over the place (#1 girl on team, if not the state, is at public) and the ones at McD are not going to make much of an impact. Unless TC can turn them into beasts - she loves athletic frames.
GCS should be really good, and Maryvale.
I hope NDP can put together a team of good ones, because they have a maybe one from 2023s that will make a difference.
BM has the best goalie in years. Plus some solid athletes.
SPSFG has some good ones.
The McD v NDP rivalry will fade away.

Lets get excited about the season everyone!


BM has the 2023 goalie from SW's probably the best 2023 goalie in MD. I like MV's freshman class coming in. I don't think their is a stronger one out there. They got some top athletes from several clubs and the biggest thing they got was Quantity of good players. The freshman / sophomore team won indoor (yeah I know isn't the same as outdoor but shows there Talent pool). Give them a year or two.

M&D and NDP will always be powerhouses IMO. SP's and Arch does a great job of putting up good team's also.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 07:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


SW's 2023 best 4 players got split up between BM, MV, SP and NDP. Goalie and the 3 mid fielders.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 08:42 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


How do you not think SW's it not one of the better teams? They have beat or been close to any top team. Beat M&D in the NXT tournament didn't they! So I guess you still don't know anything about the 2023's.


Are you really making a claim that SW 2023 has been as successful as M&D and Hero's? Because they beat them once? lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/13/20 11:33 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


How do you not think SW's it not one of the better teams? They have beat or been close to any top team. Beat M&D in the NXT tournament didn't they! So I guess you still don't know anything about the 2023's.


Are you really making a claim that SW 2023 has been as successful as M&D and Hero's? Because they beat them once? lol


SW, hero's, and M&D are all great teams. All 3 have some really good players.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/20 12:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


SW's 2023 best 4 players got split up between BM, MV, SP and NDP. Goalie and the 3 mid fielders.

9 of hero's 23 green ended up at GCS
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/20 03:27 PM
In terms of 2023s, SPSG has 3 of M&D best, 1 of SW best and 3 Heros girls. The talent is spread out as opposed to the some of the past couple classes. SPSG, NDP and GCS have tons of 2021 talent. McDonogh doesn't have a lot once the 2020 class leaves. It should be an interesting few years. It's going to take MV a few years and another couple good classes to be competitive. They have very little in the 2020-2022 classes and you never know how girls will do in high school until they actually play. Totally different game than middle school club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/20 07:54 PM
Looking at the upcoming season does Mcd win National Championship again? Or does ESM from Long Island win it? Any teams in Philly? Darien I think can be a dark horse. I don’t think any other good teams out there across country.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/20 10:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Looking at the upcoming season does Mcd win National Championship again? Or does ESM from Long Island win it? Any teams in Philly? Darien I think can be a dark horse. I don’t think any other good teams out there across country.


I would be shocked if McD goes undefeated this season. They lost so much talent from last year with not much in the 21 or 22 class to replace it.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/14/20 10:11 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I can’t think of anymore than 5 standouts/bluechip in club for 2023. And none are at McD! McD has some athletes but they have more girls who are average but throw a lot of money and time into training & private coaching which makes them ok players. Watch out for St Paul’s and NDP, MV & BM in the next few years.


Not sure why you would think Maryvale or Bryn Mawr would be contenders in the next few years. Most of the 2021-2023 talent is at SPSG, Glenelg Country, NDP and MCD


I guess you don't know the 2023 class very well. Maryvale got some great lacrosse players in their freshman class this year. I know they have 6 girls from the 2023 Skywalkers Blue team. They also got some great girls from some other programs. Time will tell but their freshman class is loaded.


I know the 2023 class just fine. And I know that SW is not one of the better teams at 2023. The M&D and Heros girls went to SPSG, GCS and McD as I said. I'm sure many 2023s will make Varsity at MV this year because the team isn't very good.


SW's 2023 best 4 players got split up between BM, MV, SP and NDP. Goalie and the 3 mid fielders.

9 of hero's 23 green ended up at GCS


Maryvale took them down in indoor championships by just 1 point. Of course don't know who was there and not.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/17/20 03:52 PM
Basing any opinions on indoor results is just silly. Maryvale was bad last year but at least had CB and SA. They lost their top two offensive and top defensive player with no one therr to replace that production. If you think freshman are going to step into the IAAM and do it good luck with that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/18/20 02:24 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Basing any opinions on indoor results is just silly. Maryvale was bad last year but at least had CB and SA. They lost their top two offensive and top defensive player with no one therr to replace that production. If you think freshman are going to step into the IAAM and do it good luck with that.


Nobody said that. They have a very good freshman class but going to take a year or two too get competitive again. Also need another strong class next year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/20/20 06:29 PM
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 12:00 AM
GC at 7 is way too high and Sacred Heart at 16 is ridiculous. Northport and St. Paul’s deserve to be higher. Love that BBP is that low, parents are probably freaking out
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 10:26 AM
Northport should move up. Mount s and sacred heart should not even be in the list.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 02:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A


This will change dramatically two weeks into games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 04:01 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A


This will change dramatically two weeks into games.

top 3 will stay the same. the rest will change week to week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 04:16 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A

Big differnce in the UA/Inside Lacrosse Preseason top 24

1. McDonogh (Md.)
2. Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.)
3. American Heritage-Delray (Fla.)
4. Darien (Conn.)
5. Oak Knoll (N.J.)
6. Manhasset (N.Y.)
7. Lake Highland Prep (Fla.)
8. St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.)
9. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
10. Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
11. Moorestown (N.J.)
12. Northport (N.Y.)
13. St. Paul's (Md.)
14. Bishop Ireton (Va.)
15. Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.)
16. Milton (Ga.)
17. Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
18. Archbishop Spalding (Md.)
19. Mount Sinai (N.Y.)
20. Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
21. Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22. Severna Park (Md.)
23. Baldwinsville (N.Y.)
24. Ridgewood (N.J.)
25. Greenwich Academy (Conn.)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 07:30 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A

Big differnce in the UA/Inside Lacrosse Preseason top 24

1. McDonogh (Md.)
2. Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.)
3. American Heritage-Delray (Fla.)
4. Darien (Conn.)
5. Oak Knoll (N.J.)
6. Manhasset (N.Y.)
7. Lake Highland Prep (Fla.)
8. St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.)
9. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
10. Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
11. Moorestown (N.J.)
12. Northport (N.Y.)
13. St. Paul's (Md.)
14. Bishop Ireton (Va.)
15. Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.)
16. Milton (Ga.)
17. Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
18. Archbishop Spalding (Md.)
19. Mount Sinai (N.Y.)
20. Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
21. Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22. Severna Park (Md.)
23. Baldwinsville (N.Y.)
24. Ridgewood (N.J.)
25. Greenwich Academy (Conn.)


The UA rankings seem much more tuned in. The US Lacrosse Rankings are a bit confusing in terms of certain teams.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 08:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A

Big differnce in the UA/Inside Lacrosse Preseason top 24

1. McDonogh (Md.)
2. Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.)
3. American Heritage-Delray (Fla.)
4. Darien (Conn.)
5. Oak Knoll (N.J.)
6. Manhasset (N.Y.)
7. Lake Highland Prep (Fla.)
8. St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.)
9. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
10. Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
11. Moorestown (N.J.)
12. Northport (N.Y.)
13. St. Paul's (Md.)
14. Bishop Ireton (Va.)
15. Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.)
16. Milton (Ga.)
17. Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
18. Archbishop Spalding (Md.)
19. Mount Sinai (N.Y.)
20. Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
21. Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22. Severna Park (Md.)
23. Baldwinsville (N.Y.)
24. Ridgewood (N.J.)
25. Greenwich Academy (Conn.)


The UA rankings seem much more tuned in. The US Lacrosse Rankings are a bit confusing in terms of certain teams.

US Lacrosse rankings are way off...they always are
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/21/20 08:20 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NATIONAL TOP 25

PRESEASON
W/L
PREV
1 McDonogh (Md.) 0-0 N/A
2 St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.) 0-0 N/A
3 Darien (Conn.) 0-0 N/A
4 Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
5 St. Anthony's (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
6 Oak Knoll (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
7 Garden City (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
8 Episcopal Academy (Pa.) 0-0 N/A
9 Moorestown (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
10 Manhasset (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
11 Ridgewood (N.J.) 0-0 N/A
12 Mount Sinai (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
13 Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
14 Bishop Ireton (Va.) 0-0 N/A
15 Georgetown Visitation (D.C.) 0-0 N/A
16 Sacred Heart (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
17 Severna Park (Md.) 0-0 N/A
18 Baldwinsville (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
19 Northport (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
20 St. Pauls' SG (Md.) 0-0 N/A
21 American Heritage-Delray (Fla.) 0-0 N/A
22 Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
23 Fayetteville-Manlius (N.Y.) 0-0 N/A
24 Archbishop Spalding (Md.) 0-0 N/A
25 Notre Dame Prep (Md.) 0-0 N/A

Big differnce in the UA/Inside Lacrosse Preseason top 24

1. McDonogh (Md.)
2. Eastport-South Manor (N.Y.)
3. American Heritage-Delray (Fla.)
4. Darien (Conn.)
5. Oak Knoll (N.J.)
6. Manhasset (N.Y.)
7. Lake Highland Prep (Fla.)
8. St. Stephen's & St. Agnes (Va.)
9. St. Anthony's (N.Y.)
10. Episcopal Academy (Pa.)
11. Moorestown (N.J.)
12. Northport (N.Y.)
13. St. Paul's (Md.)
14. Bishop Ireton (Va.)
15. Bayport-Blue Point (N.Y.)
16. Milton (Ga.)
17. Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.)
18. Archbishop Spalding (Md.)
19. Mount Sinai (N.Y.)
20. Georgetown Visitation (D.C.)
21. Agnes Irwin (Pa.)
22. Severna Park (Md.)
23. Baldwinsville (N.Y.)
24. Ridgewood (N.J.)
25. Greenwich Academy (Conn.)


The UA rankings seem much more tuned in. The US Lacrosse Rankings are a bit confusing in terms of certain teams.

Both will change dramatically two weeks into games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/22/20 11:39 AM
CSH at 4 is way off. Most of top talent graduated last year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/23/20 01:59 AM
St Anthony’s is stacked and very very deep. It would be nice to see them play some of the Maryland privates.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/23/20 05:35 PM
SA has 1 stud and some very good players. Easy with the stacked comments
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/24/20 05:10 AM
Not freaking out at BBP at the UA/Inside Lacrosse rankings are basically spot on as the season is about to begin. Now it is to be figured out on the field.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/25/20 04:06 PM
is There any way to find out the IAAM rosters? Some schools have them posted- and some don’t. Of many schools do the ancillary websites like MaxPreps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/28/20 06:39 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
is There any way to find out the IAAM rosters? Some schools have them posted- and some don’t. Of many schools do the ancillary websites like MaxPreps.


Lot of schools have them on their websites. Some are on MaxPreps. Question is why do you care?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 02/29/20 03:09 PM
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/02/20 06:24 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀


My point was I'm pretty sure if you want to know if girls your daughter plays club with made Varsity your daughter would know. All the baltimore girls know each other. McD, Spalding, RPCS, Maryvale, JC, Severn i think all usually have their rosters on their websites. SPSG's roster is usually on MaxPreps.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/02/20 09:27 PM
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 01:33 PM
You would lose that bet -the top publics play the IAAM varsity teams regularly and win about 50% of the time. Don't be mad that you have wasted your money on a prep school when you could have just paid for college and let the kid grow up normally.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 02:07 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀



My guess is that your little Suzzie made the varsity team, and now you want to base that achievement against her fellow piers. Perhaps you should just ask them and stop trolling to puff your chest out. Different teams have different needs. Judge that what she does on the field (if she gets on the field) and not by whispering about others. But hey, congrats to her.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 05:15 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
is There any way to find out the IAAM rosters? Some schools have them posted- and some don’t. Of many schools do the ancillary websites like MaxPreps.


To answer your question instead of acting like you are a psycho for wanting to know something 90% of the ones calling you a psycho have looked up themselves-

McDonogh has theirs posted on their site.
SPSG does not have theirs posted.
NDP does not have theirs posted.
Glenelg Country has theirs posted
Spalding has theirs posted
Maryvale has theirs posted
RPCS has theirs posted
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 05:55 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
is There any way to find out the IAAM rosters? Some schools have them posted- and some don’t. Of many schools do the ancillary websites like MaxPreps.


To answer your question instead of acting like you are a psycho for wanting to know something 90% of the ones calling you a psycho have looked up themselves-

McDonogh has theirs posted on their site.
SPSG does not have theirs posted.
NDP does not have theirs posted.
Glenelg Country has theirs posted
Spalding has theirs posted
Maryvale has theirs posted
RPCS has theirs posted


SPSG has theirs on MaxPreps
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 05:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
is There any way to find out the IAAM rosters? Some schools have them posted- and some don’t. Of many schools do the ancillary websites like MaxPreps.


To answer your question instead of acting like you are a psycho for wanting to know something 90% of the ones calling you a psycho have looked up themselves-

McDonogh has theirs posted on their site.
SPSG does not have theirs posted.
NDP does not have theirs posted.
Glenelg Country has theirs posted
Spalding has theirs posted
Maryvale has theirs posted
RPCS has theirs posted

GCS is not accurate as they are still holding tryouts.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/05/20 06:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You would lose that bet -the top publics play the IAAM varsity teams regularly and win about 50% of the time. Don't be mad that you have wasted your money on a prep school when you could have just paid for college and let the kid grow up normally.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀




What a ridiculous statement. Just because Glenelg HS and Marriotts Ridge have won some games against IAAM teams in recent years does not come close to being 50%. If 99% of public schools played an IAAM A team they would lose by 10 goals. Not to mention that when the publics play the privates the public school girls are way more into the game than the private school girls. Severna Park goes 25-1 every year but get smoked in scrimmages against IAAM teams. Century, one of the top publics, lost to Maryvale last year who is a bottom IAAM team. There is no comparison for the most part. Name me a public school that has beaten a top private in the last 5 years other than Glenelg and MR.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/06/20 02:27 PM
I was referring to MR and Glenelg but for years SP beat Spalding Severn and St Mary's in the holiday torurneys but stopped playing them so it is really tough to make assumptions. BTW -scrimmages are for underclassmen so that theory is BS. I think SP is ranked 9th in country this year above most IAAM teams -oops.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You would lose that bet -the top publics play the IAAM varsity teams regularly and win about 50% of the time. Don't be mad that you have wasted your money on a prep school when you could have just paid for college and let the kid grow up normally.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀




What a ridiculous statement. Just because Glenelg HS and Marriotts Ridge have won some games against IAAM teams in recent years does not come close to being 50%. If 99% of public schools played an IAAM A team they would lose by 10 goals. Not to mention that when the publics play the privates the public school girls are way more into the game than the private school girls. Severna Park goes 25-1 every year but get smoked in scrimmages against IAAM teams. Century, one of the top publics, lost to Maryvale last year who is a bottom IAAM team. There is no comparison for the most part. Name me a public school that has beaten a top private in the last 5 years other than Glenelg and MR.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/06/20 02:53 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was referring to MR and Glenelg but for years SP beat Spalding Severn and St Mary's in the holiday torurneys but stopped playing them so it is really tough to make assumptions. BTW -scrimmages are for underclassmen so that theory is BS. I think SP is ranked 9th in country this year above most IAAM teams -oops.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You would lose that bet -the top publics play the IAAM varsity teams regularly and win about 50% of the time. Don't be mad that you have wasted your money on a prep school when you could have just paid for college and let the kid grow up normally.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀




What a ridiculous statement. Just because Glenelg HS and Marriotts Ridge have won some games against IAAM teams in recent years does not come close to being 50%. If 99% of public schools played an IAAM A team they would lose by 10 goals. Not to mention that when the publics play the privates the public school girls are way more into the game than the private school girls. Severna Park goes 25-1 every year but get smoked in scrimmages against IAAM teams. Century, one of the top publics, lost to Maryvale last year who is a bottom IAAM team. There is no comparison for the most part. Name me a public school that has beaten a top private in the last 5 years other than Glenelg and MR.



Severna Park has no business being ranked ahead of most IAAM teams. They never play any top IAAM teams in regular season. They don't again this year. So you admit that you were talking about MR and Glenelg yet make the comment that public schools can win 50% of their games against IAAM teams and tell people they are wasting their money by sending their kids to private schools. First off, most of us don't just send out children to private school for athletics but whatever. Your point is absurd in terms of lacrosse regardless. Even if you want to include SP in the conversation, though they haven't beaten a top level IAAM team in years and years, you have named 3 of the 100s of public high schools that play lacrosse in Maryland. Not quite 50%.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/08/20 11:20 AM
Who looked good at McDonough play day? McDonough still the best, the rest follow?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/08/20 05:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I was referring to MR and Glenelg but for years SP beat Spalding Severn and St Mary's in the holiday torurneys but stopped playing them so it is really tough to make assumptions. BTW -scrimmages are for underclassmen so that theory is BS. I think SP is ranked 9th in country this year above most IAAM teams -oops.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You would lose that bet -the top publics play the IAAM varsity teams regularly and win about 50% of the time. Don't be mad that you have wasted your money on a prep school when you could have just paid for college and let the kid grow up normally.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀




What a ridiculous statement. Just because Glenelg HS and Marriotts Ridge have won some games against IAAM teams in recent years does not come close to being 50%. If 99% of public schools played an IAAM A team they would lose by 10 goals. Not to mention that when the publics play the privates the public school girls are way more into the game than the private school girls. Severna Park goes 25-1 every year but get smoked in scrimmages against IAAM teams. Century, one of the top publics, lost to Maryvale last year who is a bottom IAAM team. There is no comparison for the most part. Name me a public school that has beaten a top private in the last 5 years other than Glenelg and MR.



Severna Park has no business being ranked ahead of most IAAM teams. They never play any top IAAM teams in regular season. They don't again this year. So you admit that you were talking about MR and Glenelg yet make the comment that public schools can win 50% of their games against IAAM teams and tell people they are wasting their money by sending their kids to private schools. First off, most of us don't just send out children to private school for athletics but whatever. Your point is absurd in terms of lacrosse regardless. Even if you want to include SP in the conversation, though they haven't beaten a top level IAAM team in years and years, you have named 3 of the 100s of public high schools that play lacrosse in Maryland. Not quite 50%.


It’s good that you don’t send your kid to private school only for lacrosse. With a lot of rosters of 30+ girls most don’t get to see the field anyway.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/09/20 01:34 PM
What teams looked good at all the Maryland scrimmages this weekend?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/09/20 02:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who looked good at McDonough play day? McDonough still the best, the rest follow?


McD looked good at the play day. Competition wasn't all that great so tough to make many assumptions. There will be several good teams in the IAAM as always. Until they are beaten McD will always be the favorite. I believe for the first time in a long time there are some teams that have as much talent as McD so it should be an interesting season.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/20 11:20 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who looked good at McDonough play day? McDonough still the best, the rest follow?


McD looked good at the play day. Competition wasn't all that great so tough to make many assumptions. There will be several good teams in the IAAM as always. Until they are beaten McD will always be the favorite. I believe for the first time in a long time there are some teams that have as much talent as McD so it should be an interesting season.


I agree. Quite a few IAAM teams can beat them this year to include SPSG, Spalding & NDP.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/20 02:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who looked good at McDonough play day? McDonough still the best, the rest follow?


McD looked good at the play day. Competition wasn't all that great so tough to make many assumptions. There will be several good teams in the IAAM as always. Until they are beaten McD will always be the favorite. I believe for the first time in a long time there are some teams that have as much talent as McD so it should be an interesting season.


I agree. Quite a few IAAM teams can beat them this year to include SPSG, Spalding & NDP.


Spalding got trounced by the Stone Ridge School in a scrimmage and barely outscored Broadneck High yesterday. Let’s hold off mentioning them as possible contenders until we are a few games into the IAAM schedule.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/20 06:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Who looked good at McDonough play day? McDonough still the best, the rest follow?


McD looked good at the play day. Competition wasn't all that great so tough to make many assumptions. There will be several good teams in the IAAM as always. Until they are beaten McD will always be the favorite. I believe for the first time in a long time there are some teams that have as much talent as McD so it should be an interesting season.


I agree. Quite a few IAAM teams can beat them this year to include SPSG, Spalding & NDP.


Spalding got trounced by the Stone Ridge School in a scrimmage and barely outscored Broadneck High yesterday. Let’s hold off mentioning them as possible contenders until we are a few games into the IAAM schedule.


Spalding took a hit this year with graduation on the defensive side of the field. They’re going to have to score a lot of goals to win games.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/11/20 06:32 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is more to the investment in these IAAM schools besides lacrosse. Getting a quality education is more important to most parents I would believe. I don't know of many people who make a stellar living just from lacrosse.

And I would bet money that most JV teams in the IAAM "A" Division could beat most Varsity public school teams. Many of these schools have 3 teams in their program and still have to make substantial cuts during tryout time. They build their programs from middle school years onward. Most girls don't even make Varsity until Junior year because there are top girls in the Junior and Senior classes ahead of them. There isn't room for them until their Junior year. The competition in the IAAM is stellar for sure.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Why NOT care?
I just want to know if we are going to see the girls we’ve played with in club over the years.
See if all of that investment is paying off!😀


I am also calling BS on the IAAM JV teams beating most varsity public teams-what are you smoking MR IAAM Daddy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/12/20 02:47 PM
Will be lucky to even have lacrosse this spring. Crazy
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/12/20 08:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will be lucky to even have lacrosse this spring. Crazy

there will probably not be any HS spring sports this year, public or private
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/15/20 02:33 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Will be lucky to even have lacrosse this spring. Crazy

there will probably not be any HS spring sports this year, public or private

On Thursday, March 12, 2020, under the guidance of the IAAM Board of Governors, the IAAM secured approval from IAAM Heads of School to amend our spring season in an effort to serve the best interest of our student-athletes as it relates to COVID-19.

Effective immediately, the IAAM will place a moratorium on spring season league competition.
The moratorium on league competition will last through Friday, April 10, 2020
The Board of Governors will reevaluate the situation on Monday, April 13, 2020
League competition would resume on Monday, April 20, 2020, providing five (5) days of practice, prior to resuming any spring season competitions.
Regarding regular season standings, post-season play and a possible extension of our spring season, the IAAM Board of Governors, will evaluate and communicate next steps on the afternoon of Monday, April 13, 2020.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/30/20 10:58 PM
Does my kid get an extra year of high school too?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/31/20 05:57 PM
I’m hoping that there will be local ball /tournaments by July?
This may pan out to be just in-state or the states that are over the hump (Maryland and North-no Carolinas or south or west)
Tryouts for UA are June 7(may still be problematic) but tourney is in July(good by then?)
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 03/31/20 11:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does my kid get an extra year of high school too?

Why are some of you so upset that the NCAA did the right thing?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 10:36 AM
I don’t think anyone is upset the NCAA did the right thing at all for college players. They just didn’t complete the right thing. They should have added the 20-21-22-23 classes since they will be directly effected by this extra year for all current players. (I know the argument is the NCAA has nothing to do with HS-but they do have in future recruiting classes-these grad years will be 5 classes into a 4 year program, then it clears itself when 19/20 graduate). The showed this by recruiting rules put in place a few years ago. So don’t say they have nothing to do with HS. Let’s not kid ourselves. The schools just offered 5 year potential scholarships with no red shirt or injury red shirt being used. I completely agree that the kids/schools had no control of it, but we now live in do for one, have to do for all world.

So they absolutely did right by current college player in this mess, but the HS players are affected as well. Also,I realize that a HS has a long way to go to be even looked a by a college but those that do for next few
Recruiting years are impacted. They should be given 5 year paid scholarships as well. That is fair,just like doing the extra year for current college players.

They also should have put in it that you can’t transfer schools to be eligible for extra year as a senior. This has even more effect on incoming players. This is already the Wild West in transfer portal or kids with drawing from Ivys two days after announcement.

When decisions are made people need to look at all aspects. This didn’t happen.

What we always knew-the Athlete Student has arrived, no more Student Athlete. Actions don’t lie.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 11:46 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does my kid get an extra year of high school too?

Why are some of you so upset that the NCAA did the right thing?

Is it the right thing, though? I don’t think so. I think it is terrible that it happened, but life sometimes stinks. Life lessons.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 02:52 PM
The right thing for who ? It was a knee donk reaction by the NCAA to make itself look good....like the hero. But in actuality, it was just another in a looooong line of examples of the NCAA making terrible decisions that usually have nothing to do with the student athletes best interests. How was this the right thing for the high school class of 2020 ? Everybody is losing something in this. This decision makes the 2020 class bear the burden of it for their entire college career. Everyone else gets to wipe the slate clean next year. Not fair or right .
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 04:42 PM
Just because you like it makes it the "right thing" to do.

The 22's are screwed. Like the poster above said sometimes life is hard. The rules keep changing on the 20's, 21's and 22's. They don't get to play an extra year of high school. The 20's don't get senior night or prom or anything else. But hey the college kids get an extra year because THAT is the "Right thing to do". Don't worry about the younger kids, these kids are more important.
Give me a break.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 05:00 PM
Not true. 2020 HS students have it bad because they lost this season and will be playing with 5th year seniors for their entire college career. But their college selection was unaffected.
2022 and 2023 HS students may have it worse because they may find themselves unrecruited, having been squeezed out by current college players who are taking normally empty roster spots to play for their 5th year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/01/20 06:33 PM
Repeat after me. Lacrosse is a low priority non-revenue sport with no real profession.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/05/20 02:06 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Not true. 2020 HS students have it bad because they lost this season and will be playing with 5th year seniors for their entire college career. But their college selection was unaffected.
2022 and 2023 HS students may have it worse because they may find themselves unrecruited, having been squeezed out by current college players who are taking normally empty roster spots to play for their 5th year.


Anyone have a feel for how many will take advantage of this 5th year? I would think most seniors already have post-college jobs, grad school, etc lined up. Even w covid-19. And this 5th year would still incur expenses for the player & as stated, most won’t be making a career out of lacrosse. As the parent of a 2022, I’m hoping there are still viable D1 opportunities. If not, it will completely change what college many attend.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/05/20 08:12 PM
There will be plenty of opportunities. Go where the money is, academic and athletic combination is the way to go if the grades are there. Dont get caught in the names of the schools. A good package illustrates how much you are valued. In turn how much you will play. Looking at a lot of 2019s I'm sure many would have reconsider where they went.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 04/06/20 03:55 AM
What if the school doesn’t feel like taking you back for the fifth year? I understand to get to year five you really are invested(vs those that drop out after freshman year) in playing, but what if you had a bad season start?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/08/20 02:09 PM
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/10/20 11:46 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 01:30 AM
Are coaches even looking at 2021's? Seems they would be focusing only on 2022's if tourneys even happen since so many camps are getting cancelled.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 02:34 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol


Except that UA is now during Lake Placid. Many coaches will be at Placid Terrible planning in my opinion
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 03:31 AM
Hi - do you mean the the coaches already have a lineup of girls that they want for the teams? I get that..
But what do you think has more weight - current high school or club teams? No.1 daughter doesn't go to a Baltimore private - but we are on a good club team. Do you think the girls from NDP and St Pauls will get more of a look than our kid? The coaches are from there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous]Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol


Except that UA is now during Lake Placid. Many coaches will be at Placid Terrible planning in my opinion
[/quotif
if coaches are even allowed to travel by there colleges they will go where the most talent is and that's the UA games
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 01:12 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 01:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi - do you mean the the coaches already have a lineup of girls that they want for the teams? I get that..
But what do you think has more weight - current high school or club teams? No.1 daughter doesn't go to a Baltimore private - but we are on a good club team. Do you think the girls from NDP and St Pauls will get more of a look than our kid? The coaches are from there.

Any 2021 on the Command team last year will be back on the team this year. Most of the 2022's that were on the Highlight team last year will probably make the Command team this year if they try out
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 01:27 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol


Of course CSE is really trying to make UA happen. They make huge money from the tryouts alone - significantly more, I'm guessing, than they pay to run the event. Tournaments being rescheduled to August is creating schedule conflicts. Summer Genesis and Champions Cup rescheduled for the same weekend, for example. It's a mess that to some degree is not the fault of clubs and tournament operators, but ultimately I think it's the parents who will bear the brunt of the financial loss.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 02:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Anyone have any insight as to what states will actually let any summer tournaments take place? Hard to see Md, Pa and NJ allowing any to happen



I honestly dont see there being any summer tourneys, except maybe UA underclass games since its the best of the best competing and would be a big help to the coaches and these 2021-24 girls. Sounds like Corrigan sports is really trying to make this happen as they moved the tourney back to August. Whether parents will be allowed to watch is an unknown. Could see it played with no fans/parents, and just select amount of coaches at each game. If you think your daughter is a top player than she should be at this tryout...2021/22 team and 2023/24. Long Island and Baltimore among other regions will get close to 200 girls trying out for this team. Although 75% of the team is already chosen lol


Except that UA is now during Lake Placid. Many coaches will be at Placid Terrible planning in my opinion


Lake Placid was never a recruiting tournament anyway as it was during a dead period. Even if they do want to send a coach to both they can certainly do so. UA was originally scheduled the same weekend as G8 so it really doesn't make a difference.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 03:03 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi - do you mean the the coaches already have a lineup of girls that they want for the teams? I get that..
But what do you think has more weight - current high school or club teams? No.1 daughter doesn't go to a Baltimore private - but we are on a good club team. Do you think the girls from NDP and St Pauls will get more of a look than our kid? The coaches are from there.

Any 2021 on the Command team last year will be back on the team this year. Most of the 2022's that were on the Highlight team last year will probably make the Command team this year if they try out


I've heard just the opposite as there has apparently been alot of pushback by club coaches and parents that they're tired of seeing the same girls on the team. Some are worthy of it and we all know some aren't. Whether it's more competitive this year remains to be seen.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 04:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Hi - do you mean the the coaches already have a lineup of girls that they want for the teams? I get that..
But what do you think has more weight - current high school or club teams? No.1 daughter doesn't go to a Baltimore private - but we are on a good club team. Do you think the girls from NDP and St Pauls will get more of a look than our kid? The coaches are from there.

Any 2021 on the Command team last year will be back on the team this year. Most of the 2022's that were on the Highlight team last year will probably make the Command team this year if they try out


I've heard just the opposite as there has apparently been alot of pushback by club coaches and parents that they're tired of seeing the same girls on the team. Some are worthy of it and we all know some aren't. Whether it's more competitive this year remains to be seen.

hard to argue with last years selections for both the highlight and command since they both were champs
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 07:16 PM
Say again?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/11/20 07:23 PM
There were some real ‘22 monsters on command last year that will move up to highlight. Hopefully we’d get more of chance this year. Also we may be looking to switch clubs and we need aspects of this tryout in case summer tryouts don’t really happen.
Does anyone think teams will hold tryouts for fall? I also realize that if you’re a certain ability or class coaches will take a private look at you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/12/20 03:53 PM
Has anyone seen on USCL (red flag right there) the "Peoples Champion"?
Its all over their social media and it a 16 person bracket full of players with small bios that you vote on for popularity reasons. I just cant believe that this is a reality right now. As if these girls of a tender social age have enough to worry about.
I will add that most of these brackets are populated with players from outside the east coast - lots of Ohio Florida and out west.
I'm kind of sorry that Epoch is sponsoring this as well. I thought they were better than that and being the team sponsor of UNC they didn't have to stoop to this level.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/12/20 03:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There were some real ‘22 monsters on command last year that will move up to highlight. Hopefully we’d get more of chance this year. Also we may be looking to switch clubs and we need aspects of this tryout in case summer tryouts don’t really happen.
Does anyone think teams will hold tryouts for fall? I also realize that if you’re a certain ability or class coaches will take a private look at you.


Not to be a downer, but the more I read about it, the less I believe there will be any lacrosse until the spring of 2021. So depressing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/20 01:29 PM
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/20 03:14 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/20 03:31 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!

not sure who you are talking to but they are wrong.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/20 05:01 PM
They might be wrong, but no lax all summer seems like a safe bet at this point.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/13/20 10:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
They might be wrong, but no lax all summer seems like a safe bet at this point.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!

not sure who you are talking to but they are wrong.



https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...versity-campuses-staying-closed-for-fall
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/14/20 05:41 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!


You mentioned that there would be no lax without a cure.... what about Lax For The Cure..... See what I did there?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/14/20 07:01 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!


You mentioned that there would be no lax without a cure.... what about Lax For The Cure..... See what I did there?

classic
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/14/20 07:42 PM
Yup, thats cancelled too...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/15/20 02:19 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The announcement of Cal State system going online for the fall is definitely not good news for sports.


Unfortunately things are going to be delayed for at least another year with a potential attempt to normalcy in the winter. I hope I am wrong but from speaking to people who know ALOT more than me - fall sports like football and soccer are going to be cancelled. Some schools will open in the fall while others don't which will make school sports highly unlikely. The one caveat is this wont be everywhere. As we all know testing isn't there yet so large gatherings aren't going to occur and unlike professional sports where TV contracts and $$S will prevail there isn't going to be a central locale like Orlando or Arizona for high school sports. Without school there wont even be after school sports and if there is school - large gatherings like a football game with hundreds in the stands wont occur. Schools will start to open up in the winter but those in the know (again not me - just happen to talk to people who are) say without a cure there will be a relapse and we will be back where we are now. While we will be MUCH more prepared with masks and hopefully testing and a better response, the first thing to go will again be large gatherings. So while school will operate more smoothly with remote learning OR in some instances even staying open with factors in place such as temperature checks, face masks etc . . there will again be no LARGE gatherings after school Since I am on a Lacrosse blog - this means no spring lax without a cure. This also means no proms, school plays, etc . . I can only hope this relapse and continued "stay at home" procedure doesn't comeback next February/March but this seems inevitable. People will think all is good as things in the fall/early winter start to gain some normalcy but then things will revert. I will add that BOY, DO I HOPE THOSE SMARTER THAN ME ARE DEAD WRONG!!!


You mentioned that there would be no lax without a cure.... what about Lax For The Cure..... See what I did there?

classic


Its unfortunate but was just talking to a friend whose daughter will be enrolling in a coed New England prep school this fall and it was reported back - after a zoom call the administration just had with new parents - that it is highly unlikely Fall sports (especially those of the contact variety) are a go. That is the conversation being bantered about among ALL of the Northeast private schools. It stinks but just saying.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/15/20 05:30 PM
At this pint I just want to know how much $$$ we are getting g back from these tournaments. I’m no spring chicken and we lost $$$ last year to a rained-out ourney. Found out the hard way that with weather you get no money back!
Holding out hope and endlessly watching governors open up/close counties is getting exhausting.
It’s a good thing my daughter is not a junior. For that very reason clubs should give money back minus admin fees. It’s a good thing our club loves to run up the numbers in our teams! More families more money!
I really dont know how clubs can justify keeping any dues from this year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/15/20 06:16 PM
I thought it was moved to the end of July?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/15/20 09:25 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I thought it was moved to the end of July?


It is....dates are July 24-26th
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/16/20 04:04 PM
i predict cancellation
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/17/20 05:12 PM
Anybody have insight into the virtual clinic referred to as The Future ?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/18/20 05:12 PM
It’s put on by Revs. Not a big fan. They do lots of money grab events
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/27/20 12:26 PM
NCAA meeting today.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/27/20 03:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NCAA meeting today.


What are they expected to decide relevant to women's lax?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/27/20 03:42 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NCAA meeting today.

have a feeling the dead period is being extended through July
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/28/20 01:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NCAA meeting today.

have a feeling the dead period is being extended through July

summer tournaments, if there are any, now kind of a waste for those in the recruiting classes.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/28/20 02:14 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
NCAA meeting today.

have a feeling the dead period is being extended through July

summer tournaments, if there are any, now kind of a waste for those in the recruiting classes.


I agree. What would be the point of attending if no coaches will be there? I'm sure the competition would be good for the girls, but ultimately it comes down to performing in front of prospective colleges. If they don't lift the dead period on August then the 22s will have had no opportunity to get looks since last fall. That age group is really taking it on the chin through this whole thing.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/28/20 04:15 PM
What does the dead period cover? No on campus recruiting visits, I know. Phone calls and texts still are allowed.

Can the coaches come to tournaments? Can they work at off campus camps/clinics? For example Lacrosse Masters, etc? 'Virtual" clinics?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/28/20 05:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What does the dead period cover? No on campus recruiting visits, I know. Phone calls and texts still are allowed.

Can the coaches come to tournaments? Can they work at off campus camps/clinics? For example Lacrosse Masters, etc? 'Virtual" clinics?

Coaches can do nothing but look at film highlights during a dead period.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 05/29/20 03:44 PM
From the NCAA website:

What is a dead period?
During a dead period a college coach may not have face-to-face contact with college-bound student-athletes or their parents, and may not watch student-athletes compete or visit their high schools. Coaches may write and telephone student-athletes or their parents during a dead period.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/02/20 08:04 PM
There goes G8. Will MA be next?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/02/20 08:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There goes G8. Will MA be next?
Did G8 cancel again ? I'm not seeing that anywhere ? I can tell you M&D which runs MidAtlantic will not cancel unless forced to do so. Nobody there wants to or still has the funds to issue refunds for that tournament
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/02/20 09:03 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There goes G8. Will MA be next?
Did G8 cancel again ? I'm not seeing that anywhere ? I can tell you M&D which runs MidAtlantic will not cancel unless forced to do so. Nobody there wants to or still has the funds to issue refunds for that tournament
Delaware made the call.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/15/20 09:16 PM
UA Baltimore highlight roster was some funny reading just now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/15/20 09:59 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA Baltimore highlight roster was some funny reading just now.
Word!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 12:10 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA Baltimore highlight roster was some funny reading just now.

18 of the 23 have been on UA teams the last 2 years. Every year people complain. Baltimore won both divisions last year
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 11:43 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA Baltimore highlight roster was some funny reading just now.

18 of the 23 have been on UA teams the last 2 years. Every year people complain. Baltimore won both divisions last year

🤐
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 11:57 AM
Class of 22 heavy? Is that the surprise? Always DC tryout in Howard county coming up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 12:09 PM
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 12:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA Baltimore highlight roster was some funny reading just now.

18 of the 23 have been on UA teams the last 2 years. Every year people complain. Baltimore won both divisions last year

🤐
If you had a bad tryout but you play for the high school or club involved with the coaching staff, you got the spot over the players who were more deserving. End of discussion. It’s the way it is. Don’t try out if it bothers you.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 01:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 01:42 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/16/20 03:08 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

It seems this is the first year in a long time the talent is spread out between private and public schools. I guess you are bitter because your 22 did not make the cut?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/17/20 04:22 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/17/20 05:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened

I don’t see the purpose of having this same conversation every year. 1. There are kids selected that are deserving.
2. There are those that aren’t deserving but get in because of connections.
3. There are those who merit a spot on the team but get passed over due to points #1 and #2.

We all know it going into the tryouts, so don’t bellyache if your daughter doesn’t make the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/17/20 06:13 PM
Yes sit back and take it. Hope our heroes get a chance to show their ability this year!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/18/20 12:16 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Yes sit back and take it. Hope our heroes get a chance to show their ability this year!
Smile pretty for the camera
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/18/20 11:37 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class of 22 heavy? Is that the surprise? Always DC tryout in Howard county coming up.

The DC tryouts may be in HoCo this year but the Coaches are from DC/VA. They will not allow for girls that they view as not from the DC area to make the team. Last year some of the most talented players at the tryouts didn’t make the call back game because they were viewed from out of region.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/18/20 01:25 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Class of 22 heavy? Is that the surprise? Always DC tryout in Howard county coming up.

The DC tryouts may be in HoCo this year but the Coaches are from DC/VA. They will not allow for girls that they view as not from the DC area to make the team. Last year some of the most talented players at the tryouts didn’t make the call back game because they were viewed from out of region.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the DC tryouts are open to girls from MD too. There will be a steady steam of cars filled with talented girls that didn't make the Baltimore team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/18/20 03:08 PM
You are somewhat correct there will be a line of cars filled with girls that didn’t make Baltimore. Point is they won’t make Washington either although a lot of them should. Just check when the roster comes out and we will see who’s correct.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/18/20 09:04 PM
Maybe that’s why Washington was awful last year. LI and BAL are the only regions that can play politics and still be successful. Just that much talent in those hotbeds. Everyone else should take the best players at their tryouts so we don’t have to watch blowouts again.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/19/20 12:54 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
You are somewhat correct there will be a line of cars filled with girls that didn’t make Baltimore. Point is they won’t make Washington either although a lot of them should. Just check when the roster comes out and we will see who’s correct.
I beg to differ. Better competitions, not blowouts. Look for the DC team to be a top contender this year because of the tryout location change.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/19/20 01:31 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened

What was so obvious? For once in seems like a good mixture of girls from different schools, not your typical NDP/McD bias like last year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 01:54 PM
That’s because the standouts in the lower classes mainly 23, don’t go to MCD and NDP. It’s too bad there wasn’t a season this spring.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 02:20 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened

What was so obvious? For once in seems like a good mixture of girls from different schools, not your typical NDP/McD bias like last year.

Did the team with "NDP/McD bias" win the tourney last year?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 05:44 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened

What was so obvious? For once in seems like a good mixture of girls from different schools, not your typical NDP/McD bias like last year.

Did the team with "NDP/McD bias" win the tourney last year?

Yep... but when you take girls that go to those schools that are not deserving, that is a different story. There where plenty of public school girls that should have made the team, but were passed over based on the NDP/MCD favoritism. If you cannot notice that, then your daughter must go to one of those schools.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 06:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Command 4 out of 23 where 2024. Highlight 10 out of 23 were class of 2022. I would say the Highlight ratio argues for tryout fairness, not going for more well known/ older girls.
that and there was obvious coaching bias this year. Some of these 2022 selections are laughable

Are you referring to the Heros girls? Other than them not sure which coach would be biased.
it looks very obvious what happened

What was so obvious? For once in seems like a good mixture of girls from different schools, not your typical NDP/McD bias like last year.

Did the team with "NDP/McD bias" win the tourney last year?

There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 06:52 PM
when you win the tournament, how can you say the girls are not deserving? i do understand that girls are passed up. like any tryout, girls get overlooked. to say a player is not deserving sounds like you are a bitter parent.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/21/20 07:47 PM
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 02:55 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.
There are 4 hero’s girls on the Highlight team. These are the only 4 hero’s girls that made the call back team. The goalie is legit, the other 3 were very questionable.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 03:40 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 05:15 AM
It’s the same deal every year. Everyone knows it and the reason this tournament is losing credibility. Especially for this age group for the Baltimore team. The 2022 Hero’s and M&D coaches have always controlled the roster. I was shocked when I saw the list. Definitely not the top girls.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 01:22 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It’s the same deal every year. Everyone knows it and the reason this tournament is losing credibility. Especially for this age group for the Baltimore team. The 2022 Hero’s and M&D coaches have always controlled the roster. I was shocked when I saw the list. Definitely not the top girls.

Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

The same M&D girls have made it over the last 3 years and are good players. 5 other very good M&D 2021 girls didn't even make callbacks so not sure how much pull the M&D coach has.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 01:23 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 02:34 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Tryouts matter but when it becomes obvious that there a players being selected over players who had better tryouts then it becomes an issue. Maybe the 3 coaches should not even be at the tryouts to avoid these problems in the future. That and there should never be a parent evaluating an age group where they have child trying out.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 02:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Tryouts matter but when it becomes obvious that there a players being selected over players who had better tryouts then it becomes an issue. Maybe the 3 coaches should not even be at the tryouts to avoid these problems in the future. That and there should never be a parent evaluating an age group where they have child trying out.

it also shouldn't be coaches of clubs that will certainly pick or have already predetermined the players and coach/parents that will certainly pick their own child players. Its a shame that this goes on in the lax community. Who you know shouldn't supersede talent. These are not legit tryouts. When will it end?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 02:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.
Tryouts matter but when it becomes obvious that there a players being selected over players who had better tryouts then it becomes an issue. Maybe the 3 coaches should not even be at the tryouts to avoid these problems in the future. That and there should never be a parent evaluating an age group where they have child trying out.

Tryouts do not matter. It is about nothing more than collecting the benjamins.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 03:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.

Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 05:23 PM
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/22/20 06:10 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!
Preach!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 05:16 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!

Luckily I believe the college coaches have definitely figured that out now too. Sadly though it delegitimizes the entire tournament. Politics have always been a factor in kid sports (especially when scholarship money is involved) but the 2022 age group with the M&D and Hero’s parent coaches have taken it to another level. Everyone knows it too and it hasn’t helped M&D win any games lately either. They continue to lose games. Even losing to Steps last week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 01:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.

Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.

Let me get this straight, you watched film of every single girl that tried out? What a dork!!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 04:01 PM
Has anyone reregistered for 20-21?
Any info on what clubs are saying about fall tourneys?
Nothing here from our club.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 05:22 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!

So then if high school and/or club coaches aren't coaching the teams who do you recommend do it? Parents? lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 05:33 PM
Private school coaches...has there ever been a PUBLIC school coach?? How about a REC coach? Any coach is going to be a "parent" coach...lol
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 05:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.

Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.

Let me get this straight, you watched film of every single girl that tried out? What a dork!!
Re-read the sentence. Let me know if you need help this time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 06:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!
Parents evaluating their own daughter seems to pay off as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 06:23 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think everyone can agree that it is not a legitimate tryout...that is known and obvious. It will not change until the Coaches are someone other then a local Private School coach and/or Local Club Coach/Director. That will never happen, so this will continue...at some point, if people stop trying out and giving Corrigan the $ then just MAYBE things will change!
Parents evaluating their own daughter seems to pay off as well.


watch you will see who gets on teams...you'll see same last name coach and players its a joke thankfully colleges see through this nonsense
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 07:04 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


I believe there are only 2 or 3 Hero's 2022 girls out of 23 players. I really wouldn't call that numerous, you should get your facts straight before posting such nonsense.

It is nonsense when they don't deserve to be on the team. There were several 2021 girls from M&D and SW that didn't make callbacks. These girls are committed to Maryland, Penn State, Michigan, JMU, and other good programs and didn't even make callbacks? There is a fantastic 2022 on SW and another on TLC that didn't make callbacks. Funny how 3 Heros 2022 girls made the final roster. Sure it had nothing to do with the fact that their director is one of the coaches.

So you are essential saying the rosters should be pre determined based on where they go to school and their respective club team, not on the actual tryouts. Based on your logic, why even have tryouts? Maybe those girls that made the team had great tryouts, while the other girls could have been off that day. This seems like the first year in a long time that the tryouts actually mattered.

Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.

Let me get this straight, you watched film of every single girl that tried out? What a dork!!
Re-read the sentence. Let me know if you need help this time.

So you are saying you watched every single girl at tryouts? Even when there was 2 games going on at the same time? While watching one game, you may have missed out on what girls where doing in the other game..... but that's right, you knew exactly what was going on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 07:35 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Private school coaches...has there ever been a PUBLIC school coach?? How about a REC coach? Any coach is going to be a "parent" coach...lol

There's a public school coach coaching the Baltimore Command team. One of the highlight coaches isn't currently a HS or Club coach. Is rec lacrosse even a thing in Maryland anymore and if so aren't they all parent coaches?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 08:29 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Private school coaches...has there ever been a PUBLIC school coach?? How about a REC coach? Any coach is going to be a "parent" coach...lol

There's a public school coach coaching the Baltimore Command team. One of the highlight coaches isn't currently a HS or Club coach. Is rec lacrosse even a thing in Maryland anymore and if so aren't they all parent coaches?

Baltimore highlight does have a public school coach coaching them as well.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 08:43 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.

Let me get this straight, you watched film of every single girl that tried out? What a dork!!
Re-read the sentence. Let me know if you need help this time.

So you are saying you watched every single girl at tryouts? Even when there was 2 games going on at the same time? While watching one game, you may have missed out on what girls where doing in the other game..... but that's right, you knew exactly what was going on.[/quote]
Doesn’t matter what film shows. Better talent always gets overlooked when connections are involved. Just means your player needs to work harder to force them to take her so that if they don’t the evaluators/coaches/food truck guy will look like fools for cutting her. If your player has talent, it will be recognized. She won’t need the UA Highlight game. So cheers to the ones who made it, no matter how they made it. When some ride the bench during the games, the ones who were cut can have their laugh to make themselves feel better.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/23/20 09:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There wasn't a single NDP player on the Highlight team last year. There were several McD. There are 3 McD girls on the team this year and they're all deserving. There are no NDP players on the team again this year. The questions should be around the numerous Heros 2022 girls on the team that seemed to have been helped by the Hero's director coaching the team.


So you are saying you watched every single girl at tryouts? Even when there was 2 games going on at the same time? While watching one game, you may have missed out on what girls where doing in the other game..... but that's right, you knew exactly what was going on.

Im not the poster, but I did watch a girls mother who was evaluating turn her back to the field she was in charge of to watch her daughter on another field. Oh,and that girl made the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 09:27 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Doesn’t matter what film shows. Better talent always gets overlooked when connections are involved. Just means your player needs to work harder to force them to take her so that if they don’t the evaluators/coaches/food truck guy will look like fools for cutting her. If your player has talent, it will be recognized. She won’t need the UA Highlight game. So cheers to the ones who made it, no matter how they made it. When some ride the bench during the games, the ones who were cut can have their laugh to make themselves feel better.
☝🏻
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 12:10 PM
Thoughts on pushing contact date back to 7/1/21 for 2022's? https://www.backofthecage.com/ubbth...-1-contact-date-formally.html#Post304865
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 02:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Thoughts on pushing contact date back to 7/1/21 for 2022's? https://www.backofthecage.com/ubbth...-1-contact-date-formally.html#Post304865

I don't get it.. I don't believe any other sport has asked for the contact date to be pushed back.. Men's lacrosse hasn't?

and why 11 months?... and the way it's setting up, they will get the initial contact for the 2022 class on 7/1/21 and the initial contact with the 2023 class 9/1/21 do they plan to wrap up recruiting the 2022 in 2 months? or have they decided with the extra year granted to current players they don't need all that many 2022's

I hope/pray the NCAA denies the request
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 03:17 PM
Sounds like its a done deal. But I agree with you. 11 months is way too long. Why not allow contact but no commitment?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 04:20 PM
Everyone needs to reach out to the NCAA. This is a selfish decision made by the IWLCA.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 04:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Tryout film does not lie. Watch the film when it becomes available and then come back on here and preach your "they are worthy!". UA tryout process is a joke, not based on merit. goes for all regions, not just Baltimore.

Let me get this straight, you watched film of every single girl that tried out? What a dork!!
Re-read the sentence. Let me know if you need help this time.

So you are saying you watched every single girl at tryouts? Even when there was 2 games going on at the same time? While watching one game, you may have missed out on what girls where doing in the other game..... but that's right, you knew exactly what was going on.
Doesn’t matter what film shows. Better talent always gets overlooked when connections are involved. Just means your player needs to work harder to force them to take her so that if they don’t the evaluators/coaches/food truck guy will look like fools for cutting her. If your player has talent, it will be recognized. She won’t need the UA Highlight game. So cheers to the ones who made it, no matter how they made it. When some ride the bench during the games, the ones who were cut can have their laugh to make themselves feel better.[/quote]


Whether it's Baltimore or Long Island there will always be some great girls that don't make the team. Last year I was at the LI tryout and they had 150 girls there. Most girls that tryout think they have a chance to make the team, (you don't apply to Harvard with a 82 avg and 980 SAT), so my point is it's 100+ of who is who from 2022 and 23(this year 23/24). They seem to only take 5-7 girls from the younger grade, so it's next to impossible to make it as a younger kid. So now that's 15 or so spots to be picked from a great group of talent. Do they pick more by a kids resume or by the performance in the tryout?? My guess both. If you are a girl who plays varsity and contributes at a conf 1 school or Suffolk power then that helps, but you still need to play well at the tryout. If you go out as a no name and tear it up on the field all night during the scrimmages, you will make the team. My point is there will always be a touch of politics involved but the UA system tries to avoid that and believe me these coaches want to represent their region and WIN.
My belief is if you are looking for a great night of competition then go down to the tryout and roll the dice. What's the worst that can happen?? Kids gets cut,big deal. Maybe she shines and makes the team; it's the best tourney in the game as far as top tier talent Good luck
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 05:21 PM
2023 will get pushed back as well. It’s inevitable. College coaches will not want to recruit 2 classes on top of each other. Either way, this is so far off in the future. With so much uncertainty about this upcoming fall and You might as well add next spring, there’s no sense in getting your panties in a bunch about it now. Everything will change 15 times between now and then. At this point, don’t look past tomorrow.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 07:03 PM
A shame. Won't give kids too much time to visit schools and get to know coaches. Hopefully they can meet in the middle.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 07:12 PM
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 09:27 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/24/20 10:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Under Armor is out because they are a poorly run company with terrible financials. I am not commenting on the legitimacy of the event but, unless you were being purposefully obtuse, you are misinformed. Oh, and I am sorry your daughter didn't make the team.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 12:54 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Under Armor is out because they are a poorly run company with terrible financials. I am not commenting on the legitimacy of the event but, unless you were being purposefully obtuse, you are misinformed. Oh, and I am sorry your daughter didn't make the team.

Actually you have no idea what you are talking about in terms of why UA isn’t sponsoring the event this year. But please keep on educating us with nonsense.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 03:01 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Under Armor is out because they are a poorly run company with terrible financials. I am not commenting on the legitimacy of the event but, unless you were being purposefully obtuse, you are misinformed. Oh, and I am sorry your daughter didn't make the team.

Actually you have no idea what you are talking about in terms of why UA isn’t sponsoring the event this year. But please keep on educating us with nonsense.

According to UA the senior games are canceled because of Covid-19. Whatever the real reason if not Covid-19, it's interesting that the UAAA website makes no mention of the senior game cancellations. I guess CSE thinks it's better to just ignore the situation and hope no one notices?

https://about.underarmour.com/news/2020/03/under-armour-coronavirus-responses-and-actions
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 10:51 AM
It isn’t just UA getting out of deals or not re signing. STX couldn’t resign the US lacrosse sponsorship either.

UA is a solid company getting out of bad, expensive deals that make no sense or money to long term growth of the brand.i e UCLA, lacrosse sticks , all useless football and sport camps etc. refocusing money on e-commerce and digital where everyone now shops. These were great sponsorship for the camps and kids but super expensive and lost the Return on investment.

On UA senior game they don’t care enough to announce it, but either does IL who picks the teams. There must be other important news.

Let’s just hope soon lax gets back to normal for these girls that work hard.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 11:36 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Under Armor is out because they are a poorly run company with terrible financials. I am not commenting on the legitimacy of the event but, unless you were being purposefully obtuse, you are misinformed. Oh, and I am sorry your daughter didn't make the team.
With all the state quarantines going on and that it’s only a 2 day tournament they will be lucky to have 5 or 6 teams show up.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 03:15 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It isn’t just UA getting out of deals or not re signing. STX couldn’t resign the US lacrosse sponsorship either.

UA is a solid company getting out of bad, expensive deals that make no sense or money to long term growth of the brand.i e UCLA, lacrosse sticks , all useless football and sport camps etc. refocusing money on e-commerce and digital where everyone now shops. These were great sponsorship for the camps and kids but super expensive and lost the Return on investment.

On UA senior game they don’t care enough to announce it, but either does IL who picks the teams. There must be other important news.

Let’s just hope soon lax gets back to normal for these girls that work hard.

CSE is not helping their reputation. My daughter played UAAA Underclass 3 years. First two at Towson were good events. Last year's venue was not good. President's Cup in South Florida was terrible. Hotels more expensive and less convenient than Disney and traffic/parking was a nightmare. Would rather pay admission to Disney's much nicer facility able to handle crowds. They look greedy holding tryouts like everything is normal. I don't have a problem with teams playing locally for people who feel comfortable with that, but a tournament bringing in people from all over the country is not the right thing to do at this time.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 04:40 PM
Regarding the UA 150 do you think the swag will be “yay” or “meh” this year?
I’m sorry to some of you that we are one of the ones to do this event this year. In hindsight I’m so glad we are doing this event!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 06:19 PM
Players from NY NJ CT pulled out of UA150. To go means can’t do UA AA tryout or the event due to the 14 day quarantine on leaving MD.
Any player that attends 150 cannot attend the LI tryout the next day. stinks. But UAAA too important to pass up the chance of makikg that
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/25/20 08:20 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
under armor is no longer associated with this.
Can’t say I blame them. the reputation of the event is in the toilet.
Under Armor is out because they are a poorly run company with terrible financials. I am not commenting on the legitimacy of the event but, unless you were being purposefully obtuse, you are misinformed. Oh, and I am sorry your daughter didn't make the team.
With all the state quarantines going on and that it’s only a 2 day tournament they will be lucky to have 5 or 6 teams show up.
Regional tryouts were held so refunds wouldn’t be necessary. The question is if the games will happen.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 02:58 AM
We picked up our swag bag & my 22 was thrilled. Last year she got a stick but this year new shoes, backpack filled with apparel. My daughter had a blast last year she loved experience. We're looking forward to this week.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 11:29 AM
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 01:23 PM
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 03:20 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
We picked up our swag bag & my 22 was thrilled. Last year she got a stick but this year new shoes, backpack filled with apparel. My daughter had a blast last year she loved experience. We're looking forward to this week.

As long as you are only attending just for the swag with no expectation of your daughter actually being recruited at the event it's $600 well spent I guess. Though the value of the swag is far less then $600 I'd assume
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 03:47 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout

Next the event will be cancelled. No way a public company can risk bad press of someone contracting virus at an event like this. Right or wrong that's the reality.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 04:10 PM
It has to be the most dense comment ever - "no expectation of your daughter actually being recruited at the event". What do you base that on? All is takes is ONE play in a game that gets a coaches attention. All the girls get film of all 6 of their games (more if they go to the playoffs). The ONLY reason for the insult of the event is because your daughter didn't make it???
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 04:28 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout


Just let the coaches pick the LI teams.. they'll be accused of it anyway
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 08:06 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout


Just let the coaches pick the LI teams.. they'll be accused of it anyway
1. Event will be canceled.
2. Truth
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 09:03 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It has to be the most dense comment ever - "no expectation of your daughter actually being recruited at the event". What do you base that on? All is takes is ONE play in a game that gets a coaches attention. All the girls get film of all 6 of their games (more if they go to the playoffs). The ONLY reason for the insult of the event is because your daughter didn't make it???

Nah my daughter is a 2021 and committed a while ago. Just about everyone "makes it" these days. Ever since the recruiting calendar changed and the event was moved from the winter to the summer it has been a waste of money unless your daughter is looking to play D2 or D3. The top kids don't attend anymore for a reason. Sure you can be seen by coaches, but the price is absurd for the minimum exposure your daughter is getting. While this year is different because of COVID, for that money you could send her to 2 or 3 camps at a school she's interested in this fall where the coaches are guaranteed to see her.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 09:39 PM
One would question if you even have a daughter that plays lacrosse when you make a statement as ridiculous as saying the tournament being a "waste of money unless your daughter is looking to play D2 or D3". Go look at where the 21's on the rosters are committed to and I am sure the 22's are hoping to achieve the same.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/28/20 09:41 PM
One would question if you even have a daughters that plays lax with that comment. Take a look at where the 21's on the rosters are committed, I'm not seeing any D2 or D3, I see top D1's.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/29/20 03:55 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
One would question if you even have a daughters that plays lax with that comment. Take a look at where the 21's on the rosters are committed, I'm not seeing any D2 or D3, I see top D1's.

One would question your reading comprehension as the subject of the discussion was the UA150 and not the UA AA game.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/29/20 07:37 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout


Just let the coaches pick the LI teams.. they'll be accused of it anyway
1. Event will be canceled.
2. Truth

Event as as it was known is canceled.
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/all-america-games-shift-to-regional-format/56694
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/29/20 07:49 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
UA cancelled tryout this week for Long Island region. How will they have this event without all regions there? Upstate NY too.. no tryout


Just let the coaches pick the LI teams.. they'll be accused of it anyway
1. Event will be canceled.
2. Truth

Event as as it was known is canceled.
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/all-america-games-shift-to-regional-format/56694

Is that how you pretend to be right? The even isn't canceled
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/29/20 08:50 PM
I think this was a smart solution on Corrigan's part and the girls still get to play with another goal of making the Championship weekend. Try being positive, it goes a long way right now.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/30/20 11:55 AM
Have they rescheduled tryout dates
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/31/20 02:02 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 07/31/20 07:48 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.

Not sure why you would think that when 3 M&D players that had been on DC team last 2 years got cut. And 5 top M&D 2021 players didn't even make callbacks in Baltimore.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/02/20 01:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.

Not sure why you would think that when 3 M&D players that had been on DC team last 2 years got cut. And 5 top M&D 2021 players didn't even make callbacks in Baltimore.

M&D hasn’t had the top players in this age group ( 2021) for more than 2 years. It is not surprising that they aren’t over represented.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/03/20 01:33 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.

Not sure why you would think that when 3 M&D players that had been on DC team last 2 years got cut. And 5 top M&D 2021 players didn't even make callbacks in Baltimore.

M&D hasn’t had the top players in this age group ( 2021) for more than 2 years. It is not surprising that they aren’t over represented.

What an idiotic statement. You really believe that some of the top 2021 players in Baltimore aren't on M&D? There are 4 2021 M&D players and 5 2021 Skywalker players on the UA team. They are clearly the top 2 Baltimore 2021 teams and that's the reason they make up 9 of the 13 2021 players on the team. 7 girls have made UA the last 3 years. 3 are from M&D, 3 from Skywalkers and one from NEMS. Point was that the 5 M&D girls that didn't even make callbacks are committed to MD, PSU, Loyola, James Madison and Jacksonville. Not at least having them at callbacks seems to show that there wasn't any M&D bias going on at tryouts which was the accusation.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/03/20 02:36 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.

Not sure why you would think that when 3 M&D players that had been on DC team last 2 years got cut. And 5 top M&D 2021 players didn't even make callbacks in Baltimore.

M&D hasn’t had the top players in this age group ( 2021) for more than 2 years. It is not surprising that they aren’t over represented.

What an idiotic statement. You really believe that some of the top 2021 players in Baltimore aren't on M&D? There are 4 2021 M&D players and 5 2021 Skywalker players on the UA team. They are clearly the top 2 Baltimore 2021 teams and that's the reason they make up 9 of the 13 2021 players on the team. 7 girls have made UA the last 3 years. 3 are from M&D, 3 from Skywalkers and one from NEMS. Point was that the 5 M&D girls that didn't even make callbacks are committed to MD, PSU, Loyola, James Madison and Jacksonville. Not at least having them at callbacks seems to show that there wasn't any M&D bias going on at tryouts which was the accusation.
☝🏻
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/03/20 02:47 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Public School Coach mentioned is also an M&D coach who petitioned had at both the Baltimore and DC tryouts for favorable placement of M&D girls
Straws.

Not sure why you would think that when 3 M&D players that had been on DC team last 2 years got cut. And 5 top M&D 2021 players didn't even make callbacks in Baltimore.

M&D hasn’t had the top players in this age group ( 2021) for more than 2 years. It is not surprising that they aren’t over represented.

What an idiotic statement. You really believe that some of the top 2021 players in Baltimore aren't on M&D? There are 4 2021 M&D players and 5 2021 Skywalker players on the UA team. They are clearly the top 2 Baltimore 2021 teams and that's the reason they make up 9 of the 13 2021 players on the team. 7 girls have made UA the last 3 years. 3 are from M&D, 3 from Skywalkers and one from NEMS. Point was that the 5 M&D girls that didn't even make callbacks are committed to MD, PSU, Loyola, James Madison and Jacksonville. Not at least having them at callbacks seems to show that there wasn't any M&D bias going on at tryouts which was the accusation.

Skywalkers, M & D, YJ, LI Top Guns, Mass Elite, and Heros reign supreme at this age group (2021), but Capital Blue is top dog. Celebrate the great lacrosse for all organizations.

Good luck to the rest of the recruiting process.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/07/20 03:51 PM
How has the Capital 2021 Team done recruiting wise ? They have some really terrific players however they really don’t make a point of listing their commitments.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/07/20 08:01 PM
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/07/20 08:33 PM
All those Capital Blue players that got out on the DC UA team went 0-2 against Baltimore and 1-2 against the South. Maybe the M&D and Skywalkers girls are better after all since Baltimore went 5-0 and won regional easily.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/07/20 09:24 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020

Well the Cal commits have a slight edge at a great school. All others seem to be in a great place as well. Good for them and congrats.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/08/20 01:04 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
All those Capital Blue players that got out on the DC UA team went 0-2 against Baltimore and 1-2 against the South. Maybe the M&D and Skywalkers girls are better after all since Baltimore went 5-0 and won regional easily.
DC went 1-3 because of their tryout process. They had no chance of winning.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/08/20 03:45 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
All those Capital Blue players that got out on the DC UA team went 0-2 against Baltimore and 1-2 against the South. Maybe the M&D and Skywalkers girls are better after all since Baltimore went 5-0 and won regional easily.
DC went 1-3 because of their tryout process. They had no chance of winning.

DC tryouts were a sham, and it cost them the best team(s) they could have fielded. While it played out some at Highlight, this was especially true at the Command level, where it was run by 2nd tier-level team coaches who picked their own players and got an 0-5 and non-competive result to show for it. Not saying the DC team would have won with a better process, just saying it would have been a lot more competitive at both levels.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/08/20 07:00 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
All those Capital Blue players that got out on the DC UA team went 0-2 against Baltimore and 1-2 against the South. Maybe the M&D and Skywalkers girls are better after all since Baltimore went 5-0 and won regional easily.
DC went 1-3 because of their tryout process. They had no chance of winning.

DC tryouts were a sham, and it cost them the best team(s) they could have fielded. While it played out some at Highlight, this was especially true at the Command level, where it was run by 2nd tier-level team coaches who picked their own players and got an 0-5 and non-competive result to show for it. Not saying the DC team would have won with a better process, just saying it would have been a lot more competitive at both levels.

But I was told here that Capital Blue had the best 2021 players in the country now. Considering 7 of them were on the team rhey should have had no problem winning more than one game right?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/08/20 09:19 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
All those Capital Blue players that got out on the DC UA team went 0-2 against Baltimore and 1-2 against the South. Maybe the M&D and Skywalkers girls are better after all since Baltimore went 5-0 and won regional easily.
DC went 1-3 because of their tryout process. They had no chance of winning.

DC tryouts were a sham, and it cost them the best team(s) they could have fielded. While it played out some at Highlight, this was especially true at the Command level, where it was run by 2nd tier-level team coaches who picked their own players and got an 0-5 and non-competive result to show for it. Not saying the DC team would have won with a better process, just saying it would have been a lot more competitive at both levels.

But I was told here that Capital Blue had the best 2021 players in the country now. Considering 7 of them were on the team rhey should have had no problem winning more than one game right?

7 players on the best 2021 team is different than a team comprised of the top 2-3 players from the top few clubs. It really comes down to the tryout process and coaching, which DC did not have. Their coaches were out of their league compared to other regions.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/09/20 12:27 AM
Well maybe instead of keeping 7 kids from his own club he should have kept the 3 M&D girls he cut that had been on the team the last two years. Replacing them with an uncommitted 2021 and more capital girls and 22s doesn’t make much sense. Those girls aren’t committed to Stanford, Navy and Va Tech for no reason. They don’t play for Capital or go to Bi though so....
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/09/20 12:50 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well maybe instead of keeping 7 kids from his own club he should have kept the 3 M&D girls he cut that had been on the team the last two years. Replacing them with an uncommitted 2021 and more capital girls and 22s doesn’t make much sense. Those girls aren’t committed to Stanford, Navy and Va Tech for no reason. They don’t play for Capital or go to Bi though so....

Agreed 100 💯! That is the political aspect of tryouts. You do realize that there is a reason the M&D girls tried out for DC don’t you? That is something to take into consideration.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/09/20 11:32 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well maybe instead of keeping 7 kids from his own club he should have kept the 3 M&D girls he cut that had been on the team the last two years. Replacing them with an uncommitted 2021 and more capital girls and 22s doesn’t make much sense. Those girls aren’t committed to Stanford, Navy and Va Tech for no reason. They don’t play for Capital or go to Bi though so....

Agreed 100 💯! That is the political aspect of tryouts. You do realize that there is a reason the M&D girls tried out for DC don’t you? That is something to take into consideration.
Let’s pretend we don’t. Enlighten us.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/09/20 01:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well maybe instead of keeping 7 kids from his own club he should have kept the 3 M&D girls he cut that had been on the team the last two years. Replacing them with an uncommitted 2021 and more capital girls and 22s doesn’t make much sense. Those girls aren’t committed to Stanford, Navy and Va Tech for no reason. They don’t play for Capital or go to Bi though so....

Agreed 100 💯! That is the political aspect of tryouts. You do realize that there is a reason the M&D girls tried out for DC don’t you? That is something to take into consideration.

The M&D girls that have played for DC go to Visitation, Good Counsel, Quince Orchard and Spalding. None are from Baltimore which is why they tried out for DC. Not sure what you are insinuating.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/09/20 04:35 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Well maybe instead of keeping 7 kids from his own club he should have kept the 3 M&D girls he cut that had been on the team the last two years. Replacing them with an uncommitted 2021 and more capital girls and 22s doesn’t make much sense. Those girls aren’t committed to Stanford, Navy and Va Tech for no reason. They don’t play for Capital or go to Bi though so....

Agreed 100 💯! That is the political aspect of tryouts. You do realize that there is a reason the M&D girls tried out for DC don’t you? That is something to take into consideration.

The M&D girls that have played for DC go to Visitation, Good Counsel, Quince Orchard and Spalding. None are from Baltimore which is why they tried out for DC. Not sure what you are insinuating.
Inquiring minds would like to know what he/she is insinuating.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/12/20 08:40 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020

Well the Cal commits have a slight edge at a great school. All others seem to be in a great place as well. Good for them and congrats.


Congratulations on all of your commitments! Well done ! These young ladies might be considered as a top team as well.
YJ 2021 Blue
Harvard -2
Yale -2
Stanford -3
Boston College
Virginia
Maryland -2
Stony Brook -2
Army
Delaware
Florida
USC -2
Arizona State
Penn State
Johns Hopkins
Furman
Pittsburgh
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/13/20 11:32 AM
Does anyone know what is happening with the 9/1 contact date for 2022s? Did the NCAA vote on the IWLCA's proposal to move to 7/1, or is the change still a possibility?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/13/20 02:04 PM
Some rumors that it isn't changing, contact date to remain 9/1/2020 for class of 2022. still rumors right now so we will see.
'
I think the fact that the men's coaches voted to keep the date has help the girls cause
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/13/20 02:16 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Does anyone know what is happening with the 9/1 contact date for 2022s? Did the NCAA vote on the IWLCA's proposal to move to 7/1, or is the change still a possibility?

The recruiting dead period was just extended through Sept 30th but I don't think they've voted on women's lax contact date for 2022s yet.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 08/13/20 08:17 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020

Well the Cal commits have a slight edge at a great school. All others seem to be in a great place as well. Good for them and congrats.


Congratulations on all of your commitments! Well done ! These young ladies might be considered as a top team as well.
YJ 2021 Blue
Harvard -2
Yale -2
Stanford -3
Boston College
Virginia
Maryland -2
Stony Brook -2
Army
Delaware
Florida
USC -2
Arizona State
Penn State
Johns Hopkins
Furman
Pittsburgh

Based on commits it's pretty obvious that YJ, M&D and Skywalkers have the most talent. Of course I think everyone already knew that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/08/20 07:50 PM
Inside Lacrosse 2022 Commits

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/commitments/girls?class=2022
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/08/20 08:57 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020

Well the Cal commits have a slight edge at a great school. All others seem to be in a great place as well. Good for them and congrats.


Congratulations on all of your commitments! Well done ! These young ladies might be considered as a top team as well.
YJ 2021 Blue
Harvard -2
Yale -2
Stanford -3
Boston College
Virginia
Maryland -2
Stony Brook -2
Army
Delaware
Florida
USC -2
Arizona State
Penn State
Johns Hopkins
Furman
Pittsburgh

Based on commits it's pretty obvious that YJ, M&D and Skywalkers have the most talent. Of course I think everyone already knew that.
Maybe in the 2021 class...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/08/20 10:21 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
14 girls have reported a commitment to Inside Lacrosse.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/recruiting/club/team/Capital+2021+Blue/9774/2020

Well the Cal commits have a slight edge at a great school. All others seem to be in a great place as well. Good for them and congrats.


Congratulations on all of your commitments! Well done ! These young ladies might be considered as a top team as well.
YJ 2021 Blue
Harvard -2
Yale -2
Stanford -3
Boston College
Virginia
Maryland -2
Stony Brook -2
Army
Delaware
Florida
USC -2
Arizona State
Penn State
Johns Hopkins
Furman
Pittsburgh

Based on commits it's pretty obvious that YJ, M&D and Skywalkers have the most talent. Of course I think everyone already knew that.
Maybe in the 2021 class...

That was the discussion. Though based on early commits YJ, M&D and SW off to a good start with the 2022 class
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/09/20 12:50 AM
There are a few missing from the IL list also, maybe 5-7 additional commits that I’m aware of not listed..
UVA, Harvard, Richmond, UNC, Mercer Hofstra

so much for Coaches taking their time..
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/09/20 02:21 AM
8 Sw players from 23 blue.
6 from M&D black.
I guess M&D coach didn’t do a good enough job.


At DC there were 7-8 Va metro girls and not many M&D girls.

Unfortunately lots of good players don’t make the final 23.

Btw there were a couple evaluators at both DC and Baltimore and they might actually look for the best players at the tryout but I’m sure nobody wants to believe that.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/09/20 10:56 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
8 Sw players from 23 blue.
6 from M&D black.
I guess M&D coach didn’t do a good enough job.


At DC there were 7-8 Va metro girls and not many M&D girls.

Unfortunately lots of good players don’t make the final 23.

Btw there were a couple evaluators at both DC and Baltimore and they might actually look for the best players at the tryout but I’m sure nobody wants to believe that.
Move on.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 04:29 PM
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 05:03 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?

Very fast. Shocked how quickly considering coaches haven't seen the girls play live in a year. Much faster than last year.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 06:33 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?

Very fast. Shocked how quickly considering coaches haven't seen the girls play live in a year. Much faster than last year.

As a club coach who has witnessed this yearly for the past 7 years I am shocked how quickly it has gone this year. And shocking since the IWLCA was pushing for a delay until next summer. I wonder what changed? It's terrible for girls from smaller or newer clubs because it's been very obvious that college coaches are just recruiting girls based on club recommendations and not on actual player performance. Don't get me wrong, there have been some very deserving commitments but there has also been more than usual head scratchers. And many very talented girls left out of the commitment pool so far. This has definitely been brand new territory for even those of us who have some experience!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 06:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?

Very fast. Shocked how quickly considering coaches haven't seen the girls play live in a year. Much faster than last year.

As a club coach who has witnessed this yearly for the past 7 years I am shocked how quickly it has gone this year. And shocking since the IWLCA was pushing for a delay until next summer. I wonder what changed? It's terrible for girls from smaller or newer clubs because it's been very obvious that college coaches are just recruiting girls based on club recommendations and not on actual player performance. Don't get me wrong, there have been some very deserving commitments but there has also been more than usual head scratchers. And many very talented girls left out of the commitment pool so far. This has definitely been brand new territory for even those of us who have some experience!

The big 3 MD clubs seem to be doing the best SW, MD and Heros. about half their teams are commited in the first month.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 06:52 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?

Very fast. Shocked how quickly considering coaches haven't seen the girls play live in a year. Much faster than last year.

As a club coach who has witnessed this yearly for the past 7 years I am shocked how quickly it has gone this year. And shocking since the IWLCA was pushing for a delay until next summer. I wonder what changed? It's terrible for girls from smaller or newer clubs because it's been very obvious that college coaches are just recruiting girls based on club recommendations and not on actual player performance. Don't get me wrong, there have been some very deserving commitments but there has also been more than usual head scratchers. And many very talented girls left out of the commitment pool so far. This has definitely been brand new territory for even those of us who have some experience!
I agree with all of the above.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 09:26 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Curious to how the recruiting process is going for the 2022's?

Very fast. Shocked how quickly considering coaches haven't seen the girls play live in a year. Much faster than last year.

As a club coach who has witnessed this yearly for the past 7 years I am shocked how quickly it has gone this year. And shocking since the IWLCA was pushing for a delay until next summer. I wonder what changed? It's terrible for girls from smaller or newer clubs because it's been very obvious that college coaches are just recruiting girls based on club recommendations and not on actual player performance. Don't get me wrong, there have been some very deserving commitments but there has also been more than usual head scratchers. And many very talented girls left out of the commitment pool so far. This has definitely been brand new territory for even those of us who have some experience!
I agree with all of the above.

While I agree that it has been fast and furious for some schools who were prepared to recruit who they had on there lists, I have a hard time believing any college coach would make an offer to player on a club recommendation. Seriously?
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 09:45 PM
Now I’m sitting here wondering how it will go for my 23. Our team has t had the best past 12 months and because I like to film I at least have some film of my girl. But what about the others who don’t have film, didn’t have a high school year, Had no camps, no campus visits, got their tournaments screwed up and played weird teams and weird tiers at tournaments- I feel there is nothing to show for these girls.
I wil say that there is a 22 who just got recruited by a/ the top school who did not play for a big 3 or a big 5 but had an awesome Twitter and Insta. So maybe that is the direction? My girl won’t really put her self out there like that, posting workouts and inspiration quotes. But duly noted...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/28/20 10:47 PM
the transfer portal could be busy in 2023
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/29/20 01:41 AM
I would estimate that we’re only about 1/3 the way through d1 recruiting. The 22 class is going to be a lot smaller due to 5th years. How much smaller is the issue. The job market continues to be garbage and hiding in a masters is a good gap filler
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/29/20 01:46 AM
It is probably not difficult to identify the top 100 players. A simple screen of high school ,Ua, development camp rosters and etc should capture a decent list. The real work is to identify players 100-500.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 09/29/20 09:26 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is probably not difficult to identify the top 100 players. A simple screen of high school ,Ua, development camp rosters and etc should capture a decent list. The real work is to identify players 100-500.

Workhorse players, often not identified in the top 75 players, are the keys to a successful college program.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/12/20 02:58 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is probably not difficult to identify the top 100 players. A simple screen of high school ,Ua, development camp rosters and etc should capture a decent list. The real work is to identify players 100-500.

Workhorse players, often not identified in the top 75 players, are the keys to a successful college program.

Agree. And unfortunately the way the recruiting period has gone for the 2022 class so far, many of these girls have been overlooked. It will be interesting to see how this changes things once they are playing in college. There may be some very disappointed college coaches out there.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/14/20 11:05 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It is probably not difficult to identify the top 100 players. A simple screen of high school ,Ua, development camp rosters and etc should capture a decent list. The real work is to identify players 100-500.

Workhorse players, often not identified in the top 75 players, are the keys to a successful college program.

Agree. And unfortunately the way the recruiting period has gone for the 2022 class so far, many of these girls have been overlooked. It will be interesting to see how this changes things once they are playing in college. There may be some very disappointed college coaches out there.
More than some will be.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/14/20 02:21 PM
So, are you saying the coaches are going to be disappointed in who they recruited? Or that they may have missed some good players? If you are stating that they will be disappointed in their selection, that is an obnoxious comment. The coaches didn't blindly pick their recruits...clearly they know them as a player...so I'm very confused by your statement.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/15/20 05:58 PM
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/15/20 07:01 PM
So now you are stating that you have watched EVERY 22 player that have committed....THAT is a stretch for sure
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/16/20 03:01 AM
What he/she is insinuating is that there were 22s recruited solely because they're minorities not for their talent which is why they suggested sunbathing to get a "really good tan". Comment is obnoxious, inappropriate and keyboard warrior sounds bitter. Shame on you
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/16/20 10:19 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What he/she is insinuating is that there were 22s recruited solely because they're minorities not for their talent which is why they suggested sunbathing to get a "really good tan". Comment is obnoxious, inappropriate and keyboard warrior sounds bitter. Shame on you

Inappropriate yes, completely untrue no. In today’s time teams are trying to diversify so yeah there may be some “stretches” skill wise.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/16/20 01:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...

WOW...are you proud of yourself for actually typing that????
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/16/20 09:38 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...

WOW...are you proud of yourself for actually typing that????


You may not like what I said but your not saying wrong!
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/17/20 12:33 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...

WOW...are you proud of yourself for actually typing that????


You may not like what I said but your not saying wrong!
Continue making your anonymous comments. It’s clear you are comfortable with being a racist. I can only imagine your player’s attitude.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/17/20 10:50 PM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...

WOW...are you proud of yourself for actually typing that????


You may not like what I said but your not saying wrong!
Continue making your anonymous comments. It’s clear you are comfortable with being a racist. I can only imagine your player’s attitude.

It’s not racist to say someone has a advantage because of the color of their skin. Obviously white people I’ve had advantage for about 400 years. It’s racist to to say someone is inherently better/worse because of the skin color they were born with. But you can wallow in your guilt if you like.
Posted By: Anonymous Re: Girls High School - 10/18/20 12:41 AM
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
At the end of the day coaches are taking commitments from kids they only probably watched last fall. Summer of 19 coaches we’re watching 21s. Some coaches will be happy some will be disappointed with whom there being sold a bill of goods for from coaches/club directors. Watched all the 22s play for years and some of the commitments are a stretch for sure. Also go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want...

WOW...are you proud of yourself for actually typing that????


You may not like what I said but your not saying wrong!
Continue making your anonymous comments. It’s clear you are comfortable with being a racist. I can only imagine your player’s attitude.

It’s not racist to say someone has a advantage because of the color of their skin. Obviously white people I’ve had advantage for about 400 years. It’s racist to to say someone is inherently better/worse because of the skin color they were born with. But you can wallow in your guilt if you like.

“go lay on a beach get a really good tan and seems like you could go to any school you want“ = racist
© Back of THE CAGE