Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
It's actually a very silly argument. Just go take a look at the uscl rankings that were released and comb through each year 2024-2029....look at the top 10. You will see numerous years with YJ in the top 10 and yes that includes out of state Maryland teams as well . 91 has not one top10 team in any of these rankings . Why are we even having this discussion ? 91 is not a top girls program and never will be .

In all fairness, the 2029 team has a huge asterisk next to its name as it’s coached by Spallina. I believe they could absolutely be in the top 12, but would need to engage in more ranked play to achieve that.


And there you have it ladies and gentlemen...spallina doesn't know girls lacrosse . You can't " rah rah" a team to win and develop as they get older . They will lose and lose badly to the traditionally top girls program with coaches that know what they're doing . That's a fact

Honest question, not criticism: Do you really think that girls lacrosse differs so much from boys lacrosse to the point that the coaching doesn't translate from one to the other? Sounds like a stretch to me. The man knows lacrosse. Period. I don't agree with every bit of his antics, but he knows lacrosse.

It's actually a very different game. The 8m, 7th player, draw/circle play other rules. Yes a good coach should be able to adjust but you need to know the ins and outs of the game.