Originally Posted by Anonymous
A few facts and thoughts:

1 - No.... the Flyer Junior Goalie is better.

2 - Face facts, one player from SI put up a six spot... that's on the D- period. (not on the Goalie)

3 - Cham seniors on O were basically shut down - Juniors did most of the scoring.

Great game!




Responses:

1 - Why does everyone defend him - because he is going to a top D1 school? Because he is the chosen one? He has been mediocre at best this season. If you think he had a good game the other day you don't know lacrosse. Too many stick side goals - and another 20 yarder. There were 5 BAD goals.

2 - Kid was the best HS player I've seen - shoots just as hard lefty as righty, uses his body really well, a complete player. But I guess the goalie is not responsible for his goals - doesn't have to make saves against him.

3 - Again, nothing on the offense happens without the senior attackman - everything goes thru him. Chaminade scored 4 goals in a row in the first quarter - he didn't have any. But who did they lock off? Him. On 90% of all HS teams (and probably college) the lefty attackman is in the top 3 in scoring. Because they are the finishers - they should score a lot. Easy on the junior stuff (2 midfielders are are really good - the other juniors should not be on the field).

Agreed - great game - but stop with all the nonsense...