Forums20
Topics3,072
Posts334,919
Members2,436
|
Most Online62,980 Feb 6th, 2020
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
“Let’s compare fairly” is certainly the most ironic and tone deaf statement I think I’ve heard when talking about private wealthy schools on a lacrosse message board transposed to free public education.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
From Newsweek - as of the year 2020:
Among the schools deemed tops for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are “high-profile institutions” in urban areas and “small but strong programs” around the United States, according to Cooper. In all cases, she said the best STEM schools have “skilled teachers who keep up with developments in these fields and who create dynamic learning environments to engage their students.”
Here are all the STEM schools in Maryland that earned a spot on the list:
Baltimore Polytechnic Institute Baltimore Public STEM Rank: 36
Poolesville High School Poolesville Public STEM Rank: 121
Thomas S. Wootton High School Rockville Public STEM Rank: 160
Eastern Technical High School Essex Public STEM Rank: 240
Holton-Arms School Bethesda Public STEM Rank: 243
Centennial High School Ellicott City Public STEM Rank: 268
Winston Churchill High School Potomac Public STEM Rank: 282
River Hill High School Clarksville Public STEM Rank: 290
Towson High School Towson Public STEM Rank: 310
Gilman School Baltimore Private STEM Rank: 312
Marriotts Ridge High School Marriottsville Public STEM Rank: 412
The Bryn Mawr School Baltimore Private STEM Rank: 412
Walt Whitman High School Bethesda Public STEM Rank: 419
Urbana High School Ijamsville Public STEM Rank: 445
McDonogh School Owings Mills Private STEM Rank: 459 Again, the private vs public school standards are just very different questions. Nobody is sending their kid to McD to be a County health inspector. Let's look at the college attendance from Poly, at the top of your list: 1) Morgan State 2) UMD (UMCP) 3) Towson U So let's compare fairly - Nobody is sending their kid to Gilman or McD to attend Morgan State or Towson unless it's on some kind of full ride. They *might* be sending their private school kid to UMCP on less-than-full scholarship, because the kid, with his "equal to the top 10% of public" basic-ness, could not get scholarships to Georgetown, ND, Boston College, etc, and if his parents have any sense, they send him to UMCP which is an outstanding college for any private or public school kid, at 1/3 the cost of an elite private college, the equivalent network of which they already purchased during HS. UMD has a larger Gilman alum presence than any other school. Your point doesn’t make any sense.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
[/quote] Gilman is at the top of food chain of privates except for Park, which is a bastion of intellectual twits. Most privates are much less or the same than the top classes at many better publics. Many public kids do well and go to top colleges.
Sometimes it is better to be thought ignorant than to say something and prove it. Then explain why you decided to write what you did ? Might want to understand these words, Self Awareness.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
“Let’s compare fairly” is certainly the most ironic and tone deaf statement I think I’ve heard when talking about private wealthy schools on a lacrosse message board transposed to free public education. It's as ridiculous and delusional as the people who want to believe public schools are even remotely on the same level academically as privates.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
And let's remember reported school SAT scores are not the same.
The public school SAT scores just include the kids that took the SATs. The low performers sat out and didn't drag down the school's scores.
The private schools require ALL of their students to take the SATs. You should check your facts. Students are not REQUIRED to take SATs unless the schools they are applying to require them, whether they go to a public or private high school. There are quite a few in my son’s private school class who did not take them because the universities they were applying to no longer require them for admissions.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
“Let’s compare fairly” is certainly the most ironic and tone deaf statement I think I’ve heard when talking about private wealthy schools on a lacrosse message board transposed to free public education. It's as ridiculous and delusional as the people who want to believe public schools are even remotely on the same level academically as privates. The issue is some programs at some publics are at a minimum academically on par and in many cases superior. Across the board paying 140k for high school should get you a better education that paying nothing. However it’s not a blanket statement to say that all of one is better (or inferior) to all of another. I know parents need to justify paying the tuition for 14 years but the facts are what they are. You can get a good education and get admitted to a fine college from certain publics and certain privates. It’s all good.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
What , That you are looking for some ?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'm fine with my on age kid playing against holdbacks. Good players play up, not down. Simple way to solve the holdback issue, and it doesn't take reform from U.S. Lacrosse, just a little transparency from HoCo. Every HoCo team should have to submit a roster that includes birthdates of each player. Post that info - no names identifying kids - just the D.OB. and zip code for each player on the team on the HoCo web site. Then everyone would see what teams are really 'elite' and what teams are just stacking their rosters with holdbacks and double holdbacks. I do think it is a safety issue when certain clubs with anger issues use 5th graders against 3rd graders. Publicly posting D.OB. info would be a free, easy, no cost way to at least level the factual playing field.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'm fine with my on age kid playing against holdbacks. Good players play up, not down. Simple way to solve the holdback issue, and it doesn't take reform from U.S. Lacrosse, just a little transparency from HoCo. Every HoCo team should have to submit a roster that includes birthdates of each player. Post that info - no names identifying kids - just the D.OB. and zip code for each player on the team on the HoCo web site. Then everyone would see what teams are really 'elite' and what teams are just stacking their rosters with holdbacks and double holdbacks. I do think it is a safety issue when certain clubs with anger issues use 5th graders against 3rd graders. Publicly posting D.OB. info would be a free, easy, no cost way to at least level the factual playing field. Why would HoCO let people know that their league was unsafe for kids?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'm fine with my on age kid playing against holdbacks. Good players play up, not down. Simple way to solve the holdback issue, and it doesn't take reform from U.S. Lacrosse, just a little transparency from HoCo. Every HoCo team should have to submit a roster that includes birthdates of each player. Post that info - no names identifying kids - just the D.OB. and zip code for each player on the team on the HoCo web site. Then everyone would see what teams are really 'elite' and what teams are just stacking their rosters with holdbacks and double holdbacks. I do think it is a safety issue when certain clubs with anger issues use 5th graders against 3rd graders. Publicly posting D.OB. info would be a free, easy, no cost way to at least level the factual playing field. Second sentence = facts!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I'm fine with my on age kid playing against holdbacks. Good players play up, not down. Simple way to solve the holdback issue, and it doesn't take reform from U.S. Lacrosse, just a little transparency from HoCo. Every HoCo team should have to submit a roster that includes birthdates of each player. Post that info - no names identifying kids - just the D.OB. and zip code for each player on the team on the HoCo web site. Then everyone would see what teams are really 'elite' and what teams are just stacking their rosters with holdbacks and double holdbacks. I do think it is a safety issue when certain clubs with anger issues use 5th graders against 3rd graders. Publicly posting D.OB. info would be a free, easy, no cost way to at least level the factual playing field. Second sentence = facts! Who is dad gonna impress at the water cooler if his kid is on age and average. Remember what this is all about. Feeding parents egos. Get with the program.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
holdback discussion infinite loop:
Parents of on age kids who aren’t quite good enough to start but can play at the elite level against holdbacks—>>> moderately complain but understand that’s the way it is and generally keep it moving.
Parents of on age kids who are able to play and start against holdbacks —>> also understand it stinks but it’s generally realize in 4 years their sons will be a level above the holdbacks anyway.
Parents of holdbacks who are killing it at the elite level —>> hit the wall, play soccer, check the rankings we rule!
Parents of holdbacks who are riding the bench —>> generally silent as they quietly know their sons are going to constantly stay on the bubble to be cut every season from here on out.
Parents of AAA kids who are hovering around elite - generally the most vitriol. Feels that if there were no holdbacks taking their kids place theyd be where they want to be. This crew is TOXIC.
Parents of on age kids who are not very good at all —>> usually the loudest and somehow equate other older kids as being the reason their son isn’t a better player. That has nothing to do with anything but when your looking for an excuse - blame holdbacks.
Parents of kids playing and contributing somewhere around AA ball —>> generally seem to have the most fun just watching their sons play where they are.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
holdback discussion infinite loop:
Parents of on age kids who aren’t quite good enough to start but can play at the elite level against holdbacks—>>> moderately complain but understand that’s the way it is and generally keep it moving.
Parents of on age kids who are able to play and start against holdbacks —>> also understand it stinks but it’s generally realize in 4 years their sons will be a level above the holdbacks anyway.
Parents of holdbacks who are killing it at the elite level —>> hit the wall, play soccer, check the rankings we rule!
Parents of holdbacks who are riding the bench —>> generally silent as they quietly know their sons are going to constantly stay on the bubble to be cut every season from here on out.
Parents of AAA kids who are hovering around elite - generally the most vitriol. Feels that if there were no holdbacks taking their kids place theyd be where they want to be. This crew is TOXIC.
Parents of on age kids who are not very good at all —>> usually the loudest and somehow equate other older kids as being the reason their son isn’t a better player. That has nothing to do with anything but when your looking for an excuse - blame holdbacks.
Parents of kids playing and contributing somewhere around AA ball —>> generally seem to have the most fun just watching their sons play where they are. Good summary. Fortunately my kid is in the category of on-age and undersized but still competes at the elite level versus holdbacks. These types of kids have tone of upside once they hit puberty.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
 Re: holdbacks
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Ok, there is a reason people hold back!!! Look at the College players. How many of the top players in college now in the top 10 colleges were “holdbacks” back when?
You sound like a holdback parent, trying to rationalize it as the “non holdback” parents that are the real problem!? Youth lacrosse needs to address the holdback issue! Period!!
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Moderated by 1026ME, A1Laxer, Annoy., baldbear, BiggLax, BOTC_EVENTS, clax422, Gremelin, hatimd80, JesLax1, JimSection1, JMLax1, Ladylaxer2609, lax516, Laxers412, LaxMomma, LILax15, MomOf6, The Hop, TheBackOfTheCage, TM@BOTC
|
|