BACK OF THE CAGE
MOST RECENT POSTS
Boys 2027-5th Grade Fall 2019/Summer 2020
by Anonymous. 01/19/20 02:33 PM
Boys 2026 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
by Anonymous. 01/19/20 12:55 PM
Boys 2025-7th Grade Fall 2019/Summer 2020
by Anonymous. 01/19/20 12:46 PM
Girls 2025 Grads - Mid Atlantic Region
by Anonymous. 01/19/20 12:50 AM
Boys 2026-6th Grade Fall 2019/Summer 2020
by Anonymous. 01/18/20 10:52 PM
Boys 2028-4th Grade Fall 2019/Summer 2020
by Anonymous. 01/18/20 09:04 PM
Girls 2025-7th Grade Fall 2019/Summer 2020
by Anonymous. 01/17/20 11:26 PM
Forum Statistics
Forums19
Topics1,918
Posts260,654
Members2,154
Most Online20,908
Jan 14th, 2020
SUBSCRIBE


FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
Previous Thread
Next Thread
New Reply
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 18 of 20 1 2 16 17 18 19 20
Re: Girls High School [Re: B_O_T_C] #287890
06/30/19 06:24 PM
06/30/19 06:24 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!

Reply Quote
BACK OF THE CAGE SPONSORS

Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #287898
06/30/19 07:39 PM
06/30/19 07:39 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous

[quote=Anonymous]Game 1 folks... lets see how they do the rest of the way.. was at the game & Conny was very good. one player (2023) was very very good. Baltimore team is talented....but need to come together. first games do not matter. all are out of pool play. the fun starts tomorrow.

My next prediction as the wizard is they’ll go 1-3 in pool play picking up there lonely win against Southwest and won’t even make the playoffs.


Hey Wizard... you need to stick to your day job Baltimore Command wins UA underclass tournament!

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #287987
07/01/19 01:17 PM
07/01/19 01:17 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!



I'll chirp.. I was there with the LI team.. I didn't think we would beat the CONNY team and thought we had a better chance against Baltimore.. Turns out we didnt. Congrats to the Balt girls they proved their mettle by beating CONNY when it mattered, and a more rested LI team for the title.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #288012
07/01/19 03:45 PM
07/01/19 03:45 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Baltimore Girls win both Command and Highlight 'ships today.

Not surprised by the crickets!!



I'll chirp.. I was there with the LI team.. I didn't think we would beat the CONNY team and thought we had a better chance against Baltimore.. Turns out we didnt. Congrats to the Balt girls they proved their mettle by beating CONNY when it mattered, and a more rested LI team for the title.


CONNY command team definitely had the best player. Had Baltimore not played CONNY on Thursday CONNY would have won yesterday. Mary G and Mac are too good of coaches to let one player beat them twice. They had a plan and while she still played a great game it wasn't enough.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #288022
07/01/19 04:37 PM
07/01/19 04:37 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Wow LI parent ..... it's nice to see a congratulatory and kind comment on this board. From a Baltimore parent ... Thank You. All the girls played their hearts out.

Reply Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #288028
07/01/19 06:16 PM
07/01/19 06:16 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #288038
07/01/19 09:31 PM
07/01/19 09:31 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #288109
07/02/19 05:41 PM
07/02/19 05:41 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?


My daughter's team (another region, not Baltimore) had a dad coach who handled the offense and tried to run things mainly through his daughter, and unfortunately for the team she's not good enough to do that at UA level. Stronger players were played out of position, subbed out more often, and micromanaged to run plays geared toward getting his kid points. It hurt the team, although the best players still ended up being the top performers because that's what good players do. She wasn't good enough to be on the team, let alone be a key offensive player. Hopefully someone in the region will step up and prevent a repeat next year.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: B_O_T_C] #293678
10/07/19 12:48 PM
10/07/19 12:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 5
N
NorthEastLaxer Online content
Back of THE CAGE
NorthEastLaxer  Online Content
Back of THE CAGE
N

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 5
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: NorthEastLaxer] #294037
10/11/19 02:54 PM
10/11/19 02:54 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.

Reply Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #297244
11/29/19 05:46 PM
11/29/19 05:46 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



darn someone is salty. Just figured out this board. The Baltimore Team had no dad coaches. All 3 coaches worked with 15 evaluators to find the best team. Which I guess they did a pretty good job of. Connys best player played in same club as their coaches but I guess that’s a sore spot too. The girls that had the best tryouts made the team. Try saying that 1 time.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #297259
11/30/19 07:22 PM
11/30/19 07:22 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
darn someone is salty. Just figured out this board. The Baltimore Team had no dad coaches. All 3 coaches worked with 15 evaluators to find the best team. Which I guess they did a pretty good job of. Connys best player played in same club as their coaches but I guess that’s a sore spot too. The girls that had the best tryouts made the team. Try saying that 1 time.

Dude, you just figured out this board? Everyone has moved on from this topic but you it seems.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #297261
12/01/19 07:17 AM
12/01/19 07:17 AM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is no stronger league than the IAAM A. It’s likely “Sour grapes “ is from a lesser league


It’s not really sour grapes.
Nothing lacrosse related in this mid atlantic region will ever be decided based solely on merit. When you have evaluators who have their own kids/club players/high school players on the field, you will never get a a fair outcome. Everyone knows it, everyone complains about it, everyone comes on here and cries about it, and then a week later everyone stops whining and moves on to the next unfair tryout, where the cycle starts all over again. The same dad/coach/evaluator(s) will be at every event So if you are really that upset about it, get off the merry-go-round.

Daddy/Coach evaluators is what it is...it's not going to change unless you get a director at Corrigan Sports that gets independent evaluators for this process.


CSE first needs to stop underclass coaches from selecting and coaching their own kid at the event. Daddyball at the actual event is even worse than the club/high school coaches who might show some bias toward their own players.


In Baltimore coaches aren’t allowed to coach the age that their child try’s it for. What are you referring to?


My daughter's team (another region, not Baltimore) had a dad coach who handled the offense and tried to run things mainly through his daughter, and unfortunately for the team she's not good enough to do that at UA level. Stronger players were played out of position, subbed out more often, and micromanaged to run plays geared toward getting his kid points. It hurt the team, although the best players still ended up being the top performers because that's what good players do. She wasn't good enough to be on the team, let alone be a key offensive player. Hopefully someone in the region will step up and prevent a repeat next year.


Happens at Boys UA too. No matter how hard CS and UA try to spin it as independent evaluations it isnt. They do get many of top players but some are left out due to not knowing the coach...Frankly I think it is worst in non hotbed areas
where knowing coach has a bigger impact due to less impact players, Balt along with other hotbed areas can leave off a few top players and still field a great team. ................. Dont expect things to change,

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: Anonymous] #297264
12/01/19 12:41 PM
12/01/19 12:41 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by NorthEastLaxer
Who are your picks for the Top Girls Lacrosse Teams in each division and County?


McDonogh and SPSG should be top two teams this year.


Not sure why you’d think SPSG is going to be a top team. Basically a 500 team last year in the regular season and got a easy draw in the playoffs.

Reply Quote
Re: Girls High School [Re: B_O_T_C] #297265
12/01/19 01:46 PM
12/01/19 01:46 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



I think SPSG , MCD and NDP will all be very good . B Mawr will be good as well.

Where was a daddy coach that ruined it for others? I agree UA and Corrigan need to end this stuff.

Reply Quote
Page 18 of 20 1 2 16 17 18 19 20
Quick Reply

Options
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
CAPTCHA Verification





Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1