Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
First of all, the Philadelphia Metro area is the Hottest recruiting hot bed in the country. 2016 Class has 51 Div 1 commitments already. 51! Island isn't even close. With Haverford, Episcopal, Germantown, Malvern Prep, Lasalle,Conestoga, Radnor, all with in miles of each other, there is nowhere in the country with this amount of talent in such a small area. I would be that between Malvern and Haverford alone there are 40 commits between 2017 -2015. And yes there are some reclassified kids so it must be working. An your "on age beast" aint [lacrosse] down here. We'd whoop his [lacrosse].


Go feed your 17 yo sophomore some more scrapple... He ain't whoopin nothing. Except maybe your [lacrosse] when he figures out you held him back for sports dumba--. Hurry up, go get the phone it might be Petro... NOT.


Fact is, this Summer U15 in COLORADO is the closest to gather who is held back and who isn't. If you GO to play at the U15 than you ARE ON AGE (you DO need proof of age). If you don't go AND your teammates goes (or players from your team align with someone else) than its a obvious your older.


Agreed, U15 will explain a lot.


Exactly, go to results from last year, Dukes maybe got to quarter finals. Why? They went with the 2017 team. Because none of their 2016's could qualify with the age. Any time MD or PA have to play on age, they can't compete. It took a team comprised of six states all-stars to beat the LI team.

US lacrosse should step up and deny individual player insurance for events that do not go by it's age rules. One sure way to end this. When the liability is shifted to event organizers and or property owners, you will see change. Bet you folks from MD and PA don't want that to happen?