They would take them anyway, just a year later. Stop whining and start practicing!
Um, no they wouldn't. That's why they are reclassified.
and it would have been correct to say "just a year earlier".
The coaches don't come in looking for a set # of '16s, '17s or any other age group. They look for the best athletes. These boys are among the best athletes these coaches saw. The coaches have a finite # of scholarships/roster spots to give out, so it doesn't matter how old the recruit. Why don't you whine about the '15 that bloomed late a took a roster spot away from your cute, precious 14 yr old? It's all the same in the end
"These boys are among the best athletes these coaches saw."
If my son competed against kids a year or two younger, he would also appear to be the best athlete the coaches had seen.
Thanks for making the point of every person you say is whining.
As kids get older age is less relevant, but at this point in time it has it's advantages.
