Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Really hard to compare one grad year to the next but I disagree.

The 2027 age has three elite local teams, but 4-10 are much much stronger than the the 6-11 group at the 2028.

There's 4 2028 teams where you could say are more dominant than their 2027 counterparts, Coppermine, Crush, MDU, SW.


BLC, LBC, Integrity, NEMS, M&D, Heros, all more dominant than 2028 teams. (BLC LBC NEMS all unusually strong at 2027 for those clubs.
I don't follow the 2027 teams, which is the basis for the following questions. What is the bases for your declaration? Is it based on win/loss records? Do you think the 2027 4 - 10 rated teams appear better because they only play 3 strong teams compared to the 2028 6 - 11 rated teams playing 5 strong teams?

I think it is difficult to compare two separate age groups.

Not PP but I think it just comes down to the fact that in the 2028 year talent is more spread out. There has been a lot of parity between top 5 teams. Each team has a few really stand out players and then a lot of very good players. With that many competitive teams, there's a lot more room for players who range from good to very good on low A and B teams to keep shifting up.

In the 2027 year, many of the best players have converged in 2 (maybe 3) teams, so you have these super teams that are hard to consistently beat, and then there's everyone else. Even NEMS which PP said is unusually strong at 2027 just lost top 3 players to M&D. That hasn't happened at this year so far.