Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
The Mustangs are an embarrassment. Same with Nationals. Have not seen Kings.

Pathetic that USL or tourney organizers or club directors don’t mandate age requirements. The mustangs were not great - just 2 yrs older... but it all evens out over time and those kids playing down won’t benefit long term by beating up on their little brothers. 7 of 9 times, the young we bros end up tougher and more skilled.

That’s was what was nice about the wsyl.

Kings are on age, had a WSYL team, had all their horses on that WSYL team and were going to win it.

The Kings have several holdbacks dingbat. My son played on this team so don’t even go there. That’s laughable.

The colorado kings don’t have “several holdbacks”. Give it a rest. Just not true. Their best players are of age and were on the WSYL team that has been practicing for months. The roster hasn’t turned over so who exactly is your kid? Cause they don’t have kids “who played on the team”. Only kids “who play”. holdbacks aren’t a thing in colorado. And not sure I’ve heard anyone from colorado use the term “dingbat”. I think that’s reserved for the east coast.


Don't worry about or respond to the 91 machine parents crying about kings . They got beat so they go to one excuse as always " holdbacks ". Same excuse different year . They just can't understand the fact that they're actually beatable when they play better teams . And the crying is actually coming from the 91 machine parents who for years walked around saying " we play up one year because we're too good for our own age bracket ". But then a team beats them and they cry " holdbacks ". Too brainless to understand what they're even saying . Sad