Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Awe same jealous daddy again? It’s ok to detest buddy people know the truth. Launch did not only compete they beat leading edge, cw elite and tied tristate as Wolfpack and Taz played at the same time in the AA bracket. Check tourney machine so you can put ur mind at ease. New year new launch team no cheaters or add ons. See you all in the spring !
Boy, someone is bitter their kid didnt make launch and has to play with 91b. The attacks just show you think of Launch as the better team. as an observer, what is the ranking of second teams among the top clubs with AA teams?
Launch
O'Reilly Black
91 Menace

Do these second teams rank above or below the clubs that are A teams (not that there is anything wrong with any of these clubs)
True Blue
Shore to shore
Recon

Let the fall record speak for itself. None of the above teams beat launch. True blue hasn’t played in a tourney since September and idt recon competed anywhere this fall. Shore to shore will beat 91 menace. So bump shore to shore up.

Would we say the second team rankings follow those of the top Team in these program?
1- Legacy
2- Express
3- 91 (dont pretend like WP is what they were)

Then you rank
Taz
Express S
WP
Launch
S2S
TB
O'Reilly Black
91 Menace
Recon
Oreilly will beat true blue so swap That and I think you nailed it

Forgot about windchill. They are above shore to shore and there it is

How about you gents leave the heavy analysis to the experts, as you folks are clearly in over your head here.

http://lacrossemagazine.com/club-lacrosse-rankings/

Enough said.