It wasn't retribution for anything from a past game; the RR attackman was frustrated with the present game and made an extremely dirty play. According to parent banter from his own team it was not the first time, which probably explains why he was benched for two quarters.
I call BS on the parent banter. He is a well liked kid who doesn’t play dirty. He was frustrated, it got the best of him, and he served the time. Stop trying to insinuate otherwise.
All this talk of dirty play, cheap sots, retribution etc is silly. We are talking about 12 yr olds here. They are all stunads an make mistakes when aggression and is involved. Unless there was a legit injury which no one seems to claim lets let the boys settle it on the field.
Reply
Quote
