"You are dense. Age is age. If he meets the underage limit the grade means nothing. Just like rec lacrosse. Btw, all of the top clubs have holdbacks at 2023, especially Crabs, so, based on your implication, there should be other 2023 clubs with players that made U15 unless they did not measure up as u15."
Really who is dense? Why are you posting this in the 2023 page and asking if other 2023 clubs had any players make it? The point is that most of the players listed are 2022's. Ask again next year in the 2023 group page. The player in question is most likely the age of the other 2022's and a good player. If asking about other clubs and maybe inferring why 91 and not players from Hawks, Crabs, ect.. you are now seeing that these players will be on the U15 team or attempting to next year. This is a great way to see once and for all who really has the most holdbacks. What are you going to say next year when these kids prove they are on age? time will tell. Most 2023's turn 15 after 9/1 but maybe you are that dense.
What will be your excuse for Jr when he does not make it next year dad? There are more holdbacks than not on the top Baltimore club teams and I don’t see any of them on the team. Why not?
This is a funny exchange because of facts. There are more Hawks players than any other team. 300% more than team 91 players. They are all 2022 players. Next season they will be 2023 players on the team. Well except for one former player/dad/coach/director his son will be too old but still a 2023. HMMM
Where are all the Baltimore club players? The only 2023 is from 91. No Crabs. Nearly that entire team should be in 10th grade. You make a sound like the 91 kid is the only holdback and therefore obvious he made it. But no other holdbacks did.
This is the reason they were held back. They couldn't compete against on age players. Pretty easy to see. And sorta sad too.
Reply
Quote