Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is one reason a program like Notre Dame is not more successful and it is coaching.

If as some of you say.... "the players are just not that good" or "they are all over hyped" then who is to blame? It's on the coach. Recruiting is part of coaching. Identifying talent is part of coaching. If they do not have the talent it is all on the coach. Notre Dame is an excellent school, if they are not bringing in top talent it is because of the coach.

If the bitter pricks are wrong and Notre Dame does bring in legit talent and they underperform that is on the coach as well.

Some schools have a tough time landing the top talent but Notre Dame is not one of those schools.

It is really simple, if she does not have the talent it is her own fault. If she has the talent and still can't compete with the best programs it on her as well.


So whenever a team loses it's the coach's fault, got it. Way to take the blame off the players who actually play the game.


Big difference between losing and underachieving...


Great so lets parse words. So whenever a team underachieves some nebulous expectation, it's the coach's fault, got it. Way to take the blame off the players who actually play the game. You really seem to want to protect and coddle these athletes that are underachieving.

How do you know they are underachieving btw? Maybe the players just aren't as good as you think they are. See the problem with your logic?

Lets leave it at ND is not very good. The coach needs to coach better, and the players need to play better. Lets call it 50/50 and move on to some teams that actually matter in women's lax. ok?


Missed the point, everyone loses on occasion when they probably shouldn't, then there are teams that lose far too often when they shouldn't - coach buys the groceries and makes the meal, so that's where it starts and far too often the meal has not met expectations