Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
There is one reason a program like Notre Dame is not more successful and it is coaching.

If as some of you say.... "the players are just not that good" or "they are all over hyped" then who is to blame? It's on the coach. Recruiting is part of coaching. Identifying talent is part of coaching. If they do not have the talent it is all on the coach. Notre Dame is an excellent school, if they are not bringing in top talent it is because of the coach.

If the bitter pricks are wrong and Notre Dame does bring in legit talent and they underperform that is on the coach as well.

Some schools have a tough time landing the top talent but Notre Dame is not one of those schools.

It is really simple, if she does not have the talent it is her own fault. If she has the talent and still can't compete with the best programs it on her as well.


So whenever a team loses it's the coach's fault, got it. Way to take the blame off the players who actually play the game.


Why even have a coach if it is all on the players? Just let them run around and do their thing.

You are another parent who knows very little about athletics and team sports.

What do you think is happening at ND? We are not talking about one game or one season. Why are they unable to consistently be a Top 10 program?

You need both talent and coaching but coaching is the more important of the two.


Love it. You have all the answers AND know everyone else's background. Mensa, I'm sure. You obviously have an axe to grind with the coach. The players at ND have underachieved. They certainly deserve some of the blame. Have heard for years that the girls on the team do not have good chemistry. You can blame that on the coach. You can also blame that on the girls. Maybe they are a bunch of selfish, me first players? Probably with a bunch of me first helicopter parents, too.