Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Announcers for the USC /, SBU game were terrible.

USC very poorly coached.

Stony Brook well coached.

Transition for stony Brook was excellent.

SBU offense very unselfish. Ball movement, spacing, timing and approach all very good and well coordinated and executed (Coaching).

USC offense stagnant and just flat out bad.

SBU will have trouble with s well coached team that can control the Draw.

Kennedy is s difference maker for SBU.

Final Four should be fun.



They have an extremely mediocre non-conference schedule for the "#2" team in the country. And their conference teams are really bad. They get hurt come tournament time by not playing better competition. Not really their fault, but is what it is. No UNC, Maryland, Syracuse, Florida (this yr) etc. They could go undefeated and you still won't know really what they have until later in the NCAAs.


Haters will hate. SBU goes cross country and smacks around USC in a game that everyone predicted USC would win. But..........You somehow want to point out that their non-conf schedule isn't good enough. Non-conf schedules are made sometimes years in advance so stop with the schedule stuff. SBU was better in almost every phase of the game. Its early in season lets see how it plays out.