Many, if not most, B and C districts/towns simply do not have enough players to draw from to field competitive town teams - as such, that inability to field competitive town teams versus the A travel clubs (of which there are more on LI than many want to admit, especially amongst the lax mafia!) is NOT ALWAYS an indication of poorly run youth programs. In reality, club probably benefits players from smaller towns more so (not only) than larger towns for this very reason. Here's a simple exercise, especially for C teams: take two competitive C team rosters and combine them (If these two programs also happen to be neighboring, even better!) - if they are already competitive in of themselves, you now have a roster where 20 starters are culled down to the 10 best, with the a huge increase in depth for that combined team. This exercise can be done for any age group, youth through high school - it is still applicable. It is for this very fact alone that what CSH has accomplished is even greater than what it appears. (And, no, I am NOT a CSH parent!) One could even make the converse argument: that many of the A programs under perform given how many lax athletes they have to draw from, even the successful ones.