Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
What a bunch of phonies, so there is an inherent danger to kids who play with older kids? Yet all of you eagerly send your sons into this environment. So, you're either really bad parents, or you don't believe your own nonsense. Which is it?


You obviously cannot understand the basis of an offer on supposition of a legal case to be made IF a party chose to do so. Just as with many other civil actions, proving that such a condition actually exists is not necessary - the mere risk that it might be accepted in court is and would be enough for parties to avoid that future argument. Unfortunately, it is currently less expensive to avoid a risk or settle on a claim with such risk than it is to prevail against a claim, even if prevailing is likely. Civil law has become less and less about justice and more about the path of least resistance/cost.


You’re argument is that it’s cheaper to let your son play even though you think he’s in danger. Good to know, thanks.


If that's what you took from this, you need to go back and rethink the education you've supposedly received . . .