All it means all these teams are all within the same (not equal) ability level. That means forget A and B, the next level is Igloo 2nd team, Express 2nd team, Hitmen, Legacy A, Outlaws, fl$, True Blue, 91 2nd team and Empire. The problem is some of these teams want to compete with the big boy AA teams. Oulaws and Legacy are likey the top teams here in my opinion, but elite players from those teams tend to migrate to the big 3. Just my opinion on things.
You are silly, true blue? Empire? fl$? 91 second team? These are C teams assuming legacy, outlaws and igloo are B. Legacy a "big boy" three got smoked by igloo and express and played outlaws to a tie?
Not being "AA" does not equal "B" . . . what a maroon!
too funny that everyone is worried about a label of AA,A B ......call it what you want we all are aware of who is top level boys are and who is not...but whatever help you people to sleep at night
I love the answers from the ignorant and myopic - if it doesn't affect them then there's no problem! Typical self-centered assholes. A proper assessment of talent of teams is not necessary for labeling players - it's primarily so that teams can properly decide upon which tournaments they should be playing in so that, correspondingly, those players can get the best lax experiences in the course of their development as players! Of course, the development of any players other than your own kid and/or his teammates is of zero interest to your ilk, so no shocker there that you don't care. It is for that reason why for every program director that claims to be involved in club lacrosse primarily for the "betterment of the game and for the kids", I say BS - if they truly had the interest of the game in mind, they would advocate for policies that actually had the maximum benefit of the most players! Sadly, they're all full of sh*t - all the care about is their club. They self proclaim and others put these guys on pedestals as "leaders" in the lacrosse community - that isn't leadership - in fact it's arguable the exact opposite! The even sadder part of this is that advocating for such policies - proper team level assessments, age-based play, enforcement of said policies - would do little to nothing to diminish their players and clubs development, as well as profits. You people couldn't come up with an effective strategy and tactics to develop talent in anything.
