Multiple teams = taking money from more people and giving those B kids a terrible experience.
My son has been on a Looney's green team for 3-4 years. It's been a great experience. In speaking with friends with kids on 91, FCA etc we're paying much less. So having multiple teams doesn't appear to be motivated by profit for Looneys. The bottom line is the experience has more to do with your kid's coach than the particular club he plays on
Looneys teams appear to be happy with the organization and coaches while other Baltimore clubs like fca, crabs, and 91 always seem to be complaining and changing teams every year.
Crabs and FCA HS teams are all top 5 Nationally. Looney's has one top 5 team in HS. Crabs and FCA consistently graduate nearly full classes that go on to good College ball. Looney's hits some years, but misses more years. Looney's will need to be much more consistent to even be in the same conversation with Crabs and FCA. Turnover is natural from youth through HS. Lack of turnover from youth into HS would actually be a bad indicator.
Looney's may not be in the top 5 consistently, but they are a good program, better than most not named Crabs and FCA.
Looney's ... worse than
Crabs, FCA, Hawks, Team 91, Breakers
91md and Breakers not on par with Looney's, they are well below! Hawks is a comparable program.
Breakers already fell apart and 91'md is about to fall apart. who is the common denominator between 91'md & breakers?
MM?? What is happening this year?? I thought they had better teams this year than last
Reply
Quote
