No. The US Lacrosse position will not make all clubs go age based. They made a deal with NXT and Got Soccer to try to capture the revenue in the events business but still offer no value. US Lacrosse may care about the sport and the kids, but it is not enough to support their bahemoth annual expenses. They need revenue and the insurance gig and benefactor support doesn't sustain them. They tried to force memberships- not enough. So now, they will enter another line of business and the split occurs. Tournaments and teams divided into the haves and have nots if you will. Us Lacrosse can put their fence around the have nots and maintain control and receipts as best they can. The haves are the top clubs- they have the players and the relationships. The have conferences and events. They have the talent- the product- the value. The have nots are the bulk of the market (where the money is) that are not top flight lacrosse teams and programs but represent the largest portion of the tournament circuit. So at the common-man's expense and on the back of the everyday lacrosse player, we will now be told who to buy our insurance from, where we can play, how we can play and in turn pay these same people for decreasing value and accountability for taking away the freedom of the sport. Let it be. Freedom of choice we have and we choose despite not always liking all of our options. Now the choice if you are not on a top flight club team, will be gone. If the mission of US Lacrosse is to make more money, along side NXT and advertisers, to support themselves, they just took a big step in that direction- but it will be at the sports and their family's expense. US Lacrosse should tell us the truth. They need money, they need new lines of revenue, and despite have 120 employees and 400 volunteers, they have no idea how to do it themselves.