Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I think it's pretty safe to say that just about every high school team in the nation has at least one parent that would love to anonymously rail against their coach. And while they can argue about coaching style, X's and O's, temperament or any other topic, it usually boils down to one thing. Playing time. And when their child doesn't get much, we here about the weather, playing conditions, lack of developing players or any other nonsense a parent can come up with. Like I always say, grab a whistle and throw your hat in the ring. Then we would see just how many anonymous comments people make about you.
Is the above poster's points have any merit? Nepotism?


Nepotism? redundancy? we get it, you think that your kid didn't play because of nepotism - can we move on? could it be that he didn't play because he bought his frickin' toys with him?