Originally Posted by Anonymous
I saw at least part of each game. The FCA v 91 game was first and the kids were all rusty and out of sync. Several of the goals for both teams were on broken plays and it was not a pretty game to watch. The Crabs v 91 game was much the same and Crabs had to play 3d NE and then 91 back-to-back. 3d NE was winning both of their games at half (Crabs and FCA) and lost to Crabs by one and FCA by 2/3. These were no more than glorified scrimmages and I would not base how the season will go on these results.


Completely disagree. It's easy to use the word "rusty" since this is early in the year. Most goals came from set offenses with some spectacular shooting - by all teams. The "broken plays" were caused by strong defense and riding - by all teams. All goalies looked impressive as well.

If that 3D attackman is "rusty", I'd hate to see him when he kicks off the rust.

Let's give credit where it belongs. That was some pretty impressive early-season lacrosse by 4 very solid teams.