Thats the problem. There aren't any other sports that allow this to go on. Nobody would stand for it. The $$ has gotten so out of control in youth lacrosse and people like winners so gaming the system this way works for Crabs. Its one thing to be held back but its another to be the biggest kid in the grade above and still be held back playing against much younger much less physically mature kids.
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Crabs and Loonies are in a different league based on the number of holdbacks on both clubs.
. That statement proves you have no idea what you are talking about. Looney's has 2 to 3 holdbacks while Crabs have at least 10 holdbacks and 2 double holdbacks, who will be 16 years old this spring or they are already 16. You need to get your facts straight before you start posting inaccurate information. [lacrosse], you don't even know how to spell Looney's correctly.


How many times are you going to post this? Mr 10 holdbacks and 2 doubly holdbacks and kids being 16. Seriously!! STFU you whiny little girl. We get it. They have holdbacks. You know what? DEAL WITH IT!! Or try another sport where you are only allowed to play kids your age.

Do you just troll all the threads for an opportunity to tell everyone that they have 10 holdbacks and 2 double holdbacks?